Compatibility and Proprietary Standards: The Impact of Conversion Technologies in IT Markets with Network Effects

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0255

References

  • Au Y. A., Kauffman R. J. Should we wait? Network externalities, compatibility, and electronic billing adoption. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(2):47–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. F. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1627–1647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J. P. Do converters facilitate the transition to a new incompatible technology? A dynamic analysis of converters. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 14(6):825–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J. P. The provision of (two-way) converters in the transition process to a new incompatible technology. J. Indust. Econom. (1997) 45(2):139–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(1):143–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen P. Vista home license forbids virtualization. (2007) . MacCentral, Accessed November 4, 2008, http://www.macworld .com/article/55181/2007/02/virtualvista.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. R. Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):209–225LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crotty C. CompuServe GIF uproar. MacWorld (1995) 12(5, May):38Google Scholar
  • Cusumano M. A., Mylonadis Y., Rosenbloom R. S. Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics—The triumph of VHS over beta. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1992) 66(1):51–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P. A., Bunn J. A. The economics of gateway technologies and network evolution: Lessons from electricity supply history. Inform. Econom. Policy (1988) 3(2):165–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N. Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):1165–1181Google Scholar
  • Economides N., Himmelberg C. Critical mass and network size with application to the U.S. fax market. (1995) . Discussion Paper EC-95-11, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):940–955Google Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Shapiro C., Nelson R. R., Noll R. G. Standard setting in high-definition television. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity: Microeconomics (1992) 1992:1–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y.-M. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from Web server pricing. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):303–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(1):160–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilder G.Telecosm: How Infinite Bandwidth Will Revolutionize Our World (2000) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gohring N. U.S. urges European regulators to lay off Apple DRM. InfoWorld (2006) September 14). Accessed November 4, 2008, http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/09/14/HNlayoffappledrm_1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths R. OS X virtualization options limited for desktop users. (2008) . Accessed November 12, 2008, http://www.macworld.com/article/133961/2008/06/virtualosx.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Yu-Ming W. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2):133–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E.Winners, Losers, and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology (1999) (The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar
  • Liu C. Z., Kemerer C. F., Slaughter S. A., Smith M. D. Standards competition in the presence of conversion technology: An empirical analysis of the flash memory card market. (2007) . Working paper, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Matutes C., Regibeau P. “Mix and match”: Product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(2):221–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McBride S., Kane Y. I., Wingfield N. In Blu-ray coup, sony has opening but hurdles, too. Wall Street Journal (2008) January 7):A1Google Scholar
  • Nash J. F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18(2):155–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolai J., Snell J. Vista home cleared for virtualization. MacWorld (2008) 25(4):32Google Scholar
  • Ohlson K., Paquet C. Microsoft savors its apple. InfoWorld (1997) 19(August 11):1 and 3Google Scholar
  • Pell A. Pirates' broadside rattles Nintendo. Sunday Times (London) (2008) August 10). http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article4484224.eceGoogle Scholar
  • Roelofs G.PNG: The Definitive Guide (1999) (O'Reilly Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stokey N. L. Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 93(3):355–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundararajan A. Nonlinear pricing and type-dependent network effects. Econom. Lett. (2004) 83(1):107–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu X. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30:515–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.