Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives: Forms of Capital That Affect ICT Utilization

References

• Adler P. S., Kwon S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., Stair R. M. The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):418–430Link, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Au N., Ngai E. W. T., Cheng T. C. E. Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):43–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Social Foundation of Thoughts and Actions: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bebbington A. Social capital and development studies II: Can Bourdieu travel to policy? Progress Development Stud. (2007) 7(2):155–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G. S. Human capital. (1975) . National Bureau of Economic Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Bennett T., Silva E. Introduction cultural capital and inequality: Policy issues and contexts. Cultural Trends (2006) 15(2/3):87–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A., Premkumar G. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):229–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleha T. Down to the wire. Foreign Affairs (2005) 84(3). Retrieved August 1, 2007, http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20050501faessay84311-p0/thomas-bleha/down-to-the-wire.htmlCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A., Stine R. A. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measure in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. (1992) 21(2):205–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli H. The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Eur. J. Comm. (2002) 17(1):65–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borstein M. H., Bradley R. H.Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (1984) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Brass D., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Venkatesh V. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):399–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (The Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Crandall R. W., Jackson C. L., Singer H. J. The effect of ubiquitous broadband adoption on investment, jobs and the U.S. economy. (2003) . Criterion Economics, L.L.C., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22(14):1111–1132Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Haan J. A multifaced dynamic model of the digital divide. IT Society (2004) 1(7):66–88Google Scholar
• Dika S. L., Singh K. Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Rev. Educational Res. (2002) 72(1):31–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. Review essay on Pierre Bourdieu. Amer. J. Sociol. (1979) 84 :1460–1474Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. Gender, network and cultural capital. Poetics (2004) 32 :99–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., Shafer S., Neckerman K. From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social Inequality (2004) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Neuman W. R., Robinson J. P. Social implication of the Internet. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(1):307–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Driessen G. W. J. M. Ethnicity, forms of capital, and educational achievement. Internat. Rev. Ed. (2001) 47(6):513–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumais S. Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociol. Ed. (2002) 75(1):44–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egenfeldt-Nielsen S.Educational Potential of Computer Games (2007) (Continuum, London) Google Scholar
• Federico P. A., Dillon R., Pellegrino J. Student cognitive attributes and performance in a computer-managed instructional setting. Instruction: Theoretical and Applied Perspective (1991) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
• Galegher J., Sproull L., Kiesler S. Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Comm. (1998) 15(4):493–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):51–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorard S. Adult participation in learning and the economic imperative: A critique of policy in wales. Stud. Ed. Adults (2000) 32(2):181–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorard S., Selwyn N. Switching on the learning society? Questioning the role of technology in widening participation in lifelong learning. J. Educational Policy (1999) 14(5):523–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1998) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Henry P. Hope, hopelessness, and coping: A framework for class-distinctive cognitive capital. Psych. Marketing (2004) 21(5):375–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill T., Smith N. D., Mann M. F., Lutz R. J. Communicating innovations: Convincing computer phobics to adopt innovative technologies. Advances in Consumer Research (1986) (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT) 419–422Google Scholar
• Holbrook M. B. Aims, concepts, and methods for the representation of individual differences in esthetic responses to design features. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13(3):337–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh J. P.-A., Rai A., Keil M. Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):97–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu J., Huhmann B. A., Hyman M. R. The relationship between task complexity and information search: The role of self-efficacy. Psych. Marketing (2007) 24(3):253–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ihlen Ø. The power of social capital: Adapting Bourdieu to the study of public relations. Public Relations Rev. (2005) 31(4):492–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J. Y., Qiu J. L., Kim Y.-C. Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “divide”. Comm. Res. (2001) 28(4):507–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E., Straub D., Chervany N. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):183–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler R. C. Stress, social status, and psychological distress. J. Health Soc. Behav. (1979) 20(3):259–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvasny L. Problematizing the digital divide: Cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative. (2002) . Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Kvasny L., Keil M. The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two cities. Inform. Systems J. (2006) 16(1):23–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J.-S., Bowen N. K. Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. Amer. Educational Res. J. (2006) 43(2):193–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenhart A. Barriers to Internet access: From the non-user and new user perspective. Proc. Assoc. Internet Researchers Conf. 3.0 (2002) Maastricht, The Netherlands:1–27Google Scholar
• Lenhart A., Horrigan J., Rainie L., Allen K., Boyce A., Madden M., O'Grady E. The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. (2003) . The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Lin N. Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociol. (2000) 29(6):785–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lytras M. D. An interview with Richard Watson. Official Quart. Bull. AIS Special Interest Group Semantic Web Inform. Systems (2005) 2(1):1–5Google Scholar
• Marcolin B., Compeau D., Huff S., Munro M. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):37–60Link, Google Scholar
• McCullagh D. Bush: Broadband for the people by 2007. CNET New.Com. (2004) . Retrieved August 1, 2007, http://news.cnet.com/2100-1028_3-5200196.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=newsGoogle Scholar
• Meader G. W., Keil M., McFarlan W.The Free Internet Initiative in LaGrange, Georgia (2001) . Working Paper 0-302-041, Harvard Business School Publishing Division, Boston, 1–25Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norris P.Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• NTIA Defining the digital divide. (1999) . National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• NTIA Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. (2000) . National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Deparptment of Commerce, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Literacy skills for the knowledge society: Further results from the International Adult Literacy Survey. (1997) (OECD Publishing, Paris) Google Scholar
• OECD Understanding the digital divide. (2001) Google Scholar
• Payton F. Rethinking the digital divide. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(6):89–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):623–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Political Gateway Slow to adopt high-speed Internet. (2006) . Retrieved August 1, 2007, http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/100074Google Scholar
• Portes A. Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 22(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes A., Sensenbrenner J. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(6):1320–1350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reardon M. Voters approve citywide fiber project. CNET News (2005) July 17Google Scholar
• Reay D. Education and cultural capital: The implications of changing trends in education policies. Cultural Trends (2004a) 13(5):73–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay D. “It's all becoming a habitus”: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British J. Sociol. Ed. (2004b) 25(4):431–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Carroll J. Beyond bowling together: SocioTechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium (2002) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 247–272Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovation (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rozeboom W. W. Sensitivity of a linear composite predictor items to differential item weighting. Psychometrica (1979) 44(3):289–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saga V., Zmud R., Levine L. The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (1994) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 67–86Google Scholar
• Schultz T. W. Investment in human capital. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1961) 51(1):1–17Google Scholar
• Segars A. H. Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega (1997) 25(1):107–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah D. V., Kwak N., Holbert R. L. Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Comm. (2001) 18(2):141–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silva E. Distinction through visual art. Cultural Trends (2006) 15(2/3):141–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirgy M. J., Efraty D., Siegel P., Lee D.-J. A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Soc. Indicators Res. (2001) 55(3):241–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton-Salazar R. D., Dornbusch M. Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociol. Ed. (1995) 68(2):116–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan A. Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology (2001) 35(4):893–912Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176Link, Google Scholar
• Teo H. H., Wan W., Chan H. C., Lim C. Y. Bridging the digital divide: The effects of home computer ownership and school IT environment on self-directed learning. Proc. Twenty-Third Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) Barcelona, Spain:641–650Google Scholar
• Thompson G. D. Cultural capital and accounting. Accounting Auditing Accountability J. (1999) 12(4):394–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsikriktsis N. A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: A replication and extension. J. Services Res. (2004) 7(1):42–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J., Hacker K. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inform. Soc. (2003) 19(4):315–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Brown S. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):71–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Speier C., Morris M. User acceptance enabler in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sci. (2002) 33(2):297–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warde A. Cultural capital and the place of sport. Cultural Trends (2006) 15(2/3):107–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warschauer M. Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday (2002) 7(7). Retrieved August 1, 2007, http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/index.htmlCrossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J., Martocchio J. Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implication. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):201–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B. Physical place and cyberplace: Changing portals and the rise of networked individualism. Community Informatics: Shaping Comp.-Mediated Soc. Networks (2001) 25(2):227–252Google Scholar
• Williams D. R. Socioeconomic differentials in health: A review and redirection. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1990) 53(2):81–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu H., Rudkin L. Social contact, socioeconomic status, and the health status of older Malaysians. Gerontologist (2000) 40(2):228–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Youtie J., Shapira P., Brice K., Laudeman G., Young C., Oh E., Minin A. Who uses LaGrange's public Internet systems? Results of the LaGrange Internet Access Survey. (2004) . Impacts of Public Information Infrastructure Access working paper 4, Georgia Tech Research Corporation, AtlantaGoogle Scholar