Analyzing Sharing in Peer-to-Peer Networks Under Various Congestion Measures

References

• Adar E., Huberman B. Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday (2000) 5(10):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asvanund A., Smith M., Telang R. Interest-based self-organization of peer-to-peer networks: A club economics approach. The 13th Workshop Inform. Technologies and Systems (WITS 03) (2003) Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
• Balakrishnan H., Padmanabhan V. How network asymmetry affects TCP. IEEE Comm. Magazine (2001) 39(April):60–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan H., Padmanabhan V., Katz R. H. The effects of asymmetry on TCP performance. Proc. 3rd ACM/IEEE Internat. Conf. Mobile Comput. Networking (1997) (ACM, New York) 77–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S., Bhattacharjee B., Kommareddy C. Scalable application layer multicast. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (2002) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr J. Motorola plugs into content delivery network. Network Magazine (2003) October 6). http://journals.iranscience.net:800/www.networkmagazine.com/www.networkmagazine.com/shared/article/showArticle.jhtml@articleId=15201422Google Scholar
• Castro M., Druschel P., Kermarrec A., Nandi A., Rowstron A., Singh A. SplitStream: High-bandwidth multicast in cooperative environments. Proc. Nineteenth ACM Sympos. Operating Systems Principles (2003) (ACM, New York) 298–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y., Chuang J., Zhang H. A case for taxation in peer-to-peer streaming broadcast. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Practice and Theory Incentives and Game Theory Networked Systems (2004) (ACM, New York) 205–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman E. G., Muntz R. R., Trotter H. Waiting time distributions for processor-sharing systems. J. ACM (1970) 17(1):123–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham B. M., Alexander P. J., Adilov N. Peer-to-peer file sharing communities. Inform. Econom. Policy (2004) 16(2):197–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M., Lai K., Chuang J., Stoica I. Quantifying disincentives in peer-to-peer networks. Proc. 1st Workshop Econom. Peer-to-Peer Systems (2003) Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Fredj S. B., Bonald T., Proutiere A., Régnié G., Roberts J. W. Statistical bandwidth sharing: A study of congestion at flow level. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Comm. Rev. (2001) 31(4):111–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galenbe E., Lent R., Montouri A., Xu Z. Cognitive packet networks: QoS and performance. Proc. 10th IEEE Internat. Sympos. Modeling, Anal. Simulation Comput. Telecomm. Systems (2002) Fort Worth, TX:3–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golle P., Leyton-Brown K., Mironov I., Lillibridge M. Incentives for sharing in peer-to-peer networks. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop Electronic Commerce (2001) (Springer-Verlag, London) 75–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habib A., Chuang J. Incentive mechanism for peer-to-peer media streaming. Proc. 12th Internat. Workshop Quality Service (IWQOS'04) (2004) Montreal:171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science (1968) 162:1243–1248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang C., Abdelzaher T. Bounded-latency content distribution: Feasibility and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Comput. (2005) 54(11):1422–1437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang W., Schulzrinne H. Modeling of packet loss and delay and their effect on real-time multimedia service quality. Proc. 10th Internat. Workshop Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV) (2000) Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
• Jiang X., Dong Y., Xu D., Bhargava B. GnuStream: A P2P media streaming system prototype. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (2003) Baltimore:325–328Google Scholar
• Kant K., Iyer R., Tewari V. A framework for classifying peer-to-peer technologies. Proc. 2nd IEEE/ACM Internat. Sympos. Cluster Comput. Grid (CCGRID '02) (2002) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D., Dobra A., Gehrke J. Gossip-based computation of aggregate information. Proc. 44th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS'03) (2003) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 482–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kherani A. A., Kumar A. Performance analysis of TCP with nonpersistent sessions. Workshop on Modeling of Flow and Congestion Control (2000) (INRIA, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris) Google Scholar
• Leith D. J., Clifford P., Malone B., Ng G. TCP fairness in 802.11E WLANs. IEEE Comm. Lett. (2005) 9(12):964–966Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansour Y., Patt-Shamir B. Jitter control in QoS networks. Proc. 39th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (1998) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 50–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milojicic D., Kalogeraki V., Lukose R., Nagaraja K., Pruyne J., Richard B., Rollins S., Xu Z. Peer-to-peer computing. (2002) . Technical report HPL-2002-57, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
• Pai V., Mohr A. E. Improving robustness of peer-to-peer streaming with incentives. Proc. First Workshop Econom. Networked Systems (2006) Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Parameswaran M., Susarla A., Whinston A. P2P Networking: An information sharing alternative. IEEE Comput. (2001) 34(7):31–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paxon V. End-to-end Internet packet dynamics. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Appl., Technologies, Architectures, Protocols Comput. Comm. (1997) (ACM, New York) 139–152Google Scholar
• Pilosof S., Ramjee R., Shavitt Y., Sinha P. Understanding TCP fairness over wireless LAN. Proc. 22nd Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Comm. Societies (INFOCOM 2003) (2003) San Francisco:863–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pouwelse J., Taal J., Lagendijk R., Epema D., Sips H. Real-time video delivery using peer-to-peer bartering networks and multiple description coding. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Systems, Man Cybernetics (2004) (The Hague, The Netherlands) 4599–4605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pucha H., Zhang Y., Mao Z. M., Hu Y. C. Understanding network delay changes caused by routing events. Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS Intl. Conf. Measurement Modeling Comput. Systems (2007) (ACM, New York) 73–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy L., Liu L. Free riding: A new challenge to peer-to-peer file sharing systems. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS) (2003) Big Island, HawaiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Rejaie R., Stafford S. A framework for architecting peer-to-peer receiver-driven overlays. Proc. 14th Internat. Workshop Network Operating Systems Support Digital Audio and Video (2004) (ACM, New York) 42–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. W., Massoulié L. Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic. Telecomm. Systems (2000) 15:185–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanneck H., Carle G. A framework model for packet loss metrics based on loss runlengths. Proc. SPIE/ACM SIGCOMM Multimedia Comput. Networking Cong. (MMCN) (2000) San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
• Saroiu S., Gummadi K. P., Gribble S. D. Measuring and analyzing the characteristics of Napster and Gnutella hosts. Multimedia System (2003) 39(2):170–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan G., Jarvis S. A. A payment-based incentive and service differentiation mechanism for peer-to-peer streaming broadcast. Proc. 14th IEEE Internat. Workshop Quality Service (IWQoS) (2006) New Haven, CT:41–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajkovic L., Golestani S. J. Congestion control for multimedia services. IEEE Network (1992) 6(5):20–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatasubramanian N., Nahrstedt K. An integrated metric for video QoS. Proc. 5th ACM Internat. Conf. Multimedia (1997) (ACM, New York) 371–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogells W., Re C., Renesse R., Birman K. A collaborative infrastructure for scalable and robust news delivery. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Distributed Comput. Systems Workshops (ICDCSW'02) (2002) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 655–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu D., Kulkarni S., Rosenberg C., Chai H. Analysis of a CDN–P2P hybrid architecture for cost-effective streaming media distribution. Multimedia Systems (2006) 11(4):383–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeh C. C., Pui L. S. On the frame forwarding in peer-to-peer multimedia streaming. Proc. ACM Workshop Adv. Peer-to-Peer Multimedia Streaming (2005) (ACM, New York) 1–10Crossref, Google Scholar