The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0260

References

  • Ackerlof G. The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A. Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. Proc. ACM Electronic Commerce Conf. (EC '04) (2004) (ACM Press, New York) 21–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A., Gross R. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Proc. 6th Workshop Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET '06) (2006) Cambridge, UKCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A., Grossklags J. Losses, gains, and hyperbolic discounting: An experimental approach to information security attitudes and behavior. Proc. 2nd Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '03) (2003) College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A., Grossklags J. Privacy and rationality in decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy (2005a) 3(1):26–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A., Grossklags J. Uncertainty, ambiguity, and privacy. Proc. 4th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '05) (2005b) Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Acquisti A., Varian H. Conditioning prices on purchase history. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):1–15LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ba S., Pavlou P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belanger F., Hiller J. S., Smith W. Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002) 11:245–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benassi P. TRUSTe: An online privacy seal program. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(2):56–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M., Muchira R. Investigating the relationship between Internet privacy concerns and online purchase behavior. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2004) 5(1):62–70Google Scholar
  • Brunk B. D. Understanding the privacy space. First Monday (2002) 7(10). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_10/brunk/index.htmlCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burst Media Online privacy still a consumer concern. (2009) . Burst Media, http://www.burstmedia.com/assets/newsletter/items/2009_02_01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Byers S., Cranor L., Kormann D., McDaniel P. Searching for privacy: Design and implementation of a P3P-enabled search engine. Proc. 4th Workshop Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET '04) (2004) Toronto, Ontario, Canada:26–28Google Scholar
  • Camp L. J., Falcone R. Design for trust. Trust, Reputation and Security: Theories and Practice (2003) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CBS News Poll: Privacy rights under attack. (2005) . http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/30/opinion/polls/main894733.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa R., Sin R. G. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumers' dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management (2005) 6(2–3):181–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen S.-F.S., Monroe K. B., Lou Y. C. The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions. J. Retailing (1998) 74(3):353–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Consumer Union Consumer reports poll: Americans extremely concerned about Internet privacy. (2008) . http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_telecom_and_utilities/006189.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Cranor L.Web Privacy with P3P (2002) (O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
  • Cranor L., Guduru P., Arjula M. User interfaces for privacy agents. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interaction (2006) 13(2):135–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Protecting privacy online: Is self-regulation working? J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):20–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J., Armstrong P. K. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):104–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dinev T., Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):61–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B. Adverse selection in online “trust” certifications. Proc. 5th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '06) (2006) Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Gellman R. Privacy, consumers, and costs—How the lack of privacy costs consumers and why business studies of privacy costs are biased and incomplete. (2002) . http://epic.org/reports/dmfprivacy.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Gideon J., Egelman S., Cranor L., Acquisti A. Power strips, prophylactics, and privacy, oh my! Proc. 2006 Sympos. Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS '06) (2006) . http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2006/proceedings/p133_gideon.pdfCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossklags J., Acquisti A. When 25 cents is too much: An experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. Proc. 6th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '07) (2007) Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Hann I. H., Hui K. L., Lee T., Png I. Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 24(2):13–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris Interactive Privacy on & off the Internet: What consumers want. (2001) . Technical report, http://www.aicpa.org/download/webtrust/priv_rpt_21mar02.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Hochhauser M. Why patients won't understand their HIPAA notices. (2003) . Privacy rights clearinghouse. http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/HIPAA-Readability.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B., Adar E., Fine L. Valuating privacy. Proc. 5th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '06) (2005) Pittsburgh, PACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui K.-L., Teo H.-H., Lee S.-Y. T. The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):19–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen C., Potts C. Privacy policies as decision-making tools: an evaluation of online privacy notices. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2004) 471–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen C., Potts C., Jensen C. Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2005) 63(1–2):203–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D.Attention and Effort (1973) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Amer. Psychologist (1984) 39(4):341–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaRose R., Rifon N. J. Promoting i-Safety: Effects of privacy warnings and privacy seals on risk assessment and online privacy behavior. J. Consumer Affairs (2007) 41(1):127–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lebo H. The 2008 digital trends report: Surveying the digital future. (2008) . USC Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pages/current_report.asp?intGlobalId=19Google Scholar
  • Mai B., Menon N., Sarkar S. Online privacy at a premium. Proc. 39th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS '06) (2006) Kauai, HIGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra N., Kim S. S., Agarwal J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):336–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald A., Cranor L. The cost of reading privacy policies. I/S: A J. Law and Policy Inform. Soc. (2009) 4(3):543–568Google Scholar
  • McKnight H. D., Chervany N. L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(2):35–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLeod R. J., Jones J. W. Making executive information systems more effective. Bus. Horizons (1986) 29(5):29–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milne G. R., Culnan M. J. Using the content of online privacy notices to inform public policy: A longitudinal analysis of the 1998–2002 U.S. Web surveys. Inform. Soc. (2002) 18(5):345–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milne G. R., Gordon M. E. Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy Marketing (1993) 12(2):206–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyazaki A., Krishnamurthy S. Internet seals of approval: Effects on online privacy policies and consumer perceptions. J. Consumer Affairs (2002) 36(1):28–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moores T. Do consumers understand the role of privacy seals in e-commerce? Comm. ACM (2005) 48(3):86–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moores T. T., Dhillon G. Do privacy seals in Ecommerce really work? Comm. ACM (2003) 46(12):265–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Privacy & American Business (P&AB) New survey reports an increase in ID theft and decrease in consumer confidence. (2005) . Conducted by Harris Interactive. http://www.pandab.org/deloitteidsurveypr.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Privacy Leadership Initiative Privacy notices research final results. (2001) . Conducted by Harris Interactive. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/glb/supporting/harris%20results.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Riegelsberger J., Sasse M. A., McCarthy J. The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2005) 62(3):381–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rifon N. J., LaRose R., Choi S. M. Your privacy is sealed: Effects of Web privacy seals on trust and personal disclosures. J. Consumer Affairs (2005) 39(2):339–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose E. Data users versus data subjects: Are consumers willing to pay for property rights to personal information? Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS '05) (2005) Big Island, HICrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin P. H., Lenard T. M.Privacy and the Commercial Use of Personal Information (2002) (The Progress & Freedom Foundation, Washington, DC) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C. Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. (1983) 98(4):659–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shostack A. Paying for privacy: Consumers and infrastructures. Proc. 2nd Annual Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '03) (2003) College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. J., Milberg S., Burke S. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solove D. J. A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Rev. (2006) 154(3):477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiekermann A., Grossklags J., Berendt B. E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: Privacy preferences versus actual behavior. Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2001) ACM, New York:38–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart K. A., Segars A. H. An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):36–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Syverson P. The paradoxical value of privacy. Proc. 2nd Annual Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '03) (2003) College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Tang Z., Hu Y. J., Smith M. D. Gaining trust through online privacy protection: Self-regulation, mandatory standards, or caveat emptor. (2007) . http://ssrn.com/abstract=555878Google Scholar
  • Taylor C. R. Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. Rand J. Econom. (2004) 35(4):631–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tedeschi B. Everybody talks about online privacy, but few do anything about it. New York Times (2002) June 3). Section C, Column 1 6Google Scholar
  • TRUSTe Consumers have a false sense of security about online privacy—Actions inconsistent with Attitudes. (2006) . Conducted by TNS, December 2006. http://www.truste.org/about/press_release/12_06_06.phpGoogle Scholar
  • Turow J., Feldman L., Meltzer K. Open to exploitation: American shoppers online and offline. (2005) . A Report from the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  • Vila T., Greenstadt R., Molnar D., Camp L. J., Lewis S. Why we can't be bothered to read privacy policies: Models of privacy economics as a lemons market. The Economics of Information Security (2004) (Kluwer, New York) 143–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wathieu L., Friedman A. An empirical approach to understanding privacy valuation. Proc. 5th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS '05) (2005) Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Westin A.Harris & Associates Findings from the survey—Consumers in the information age for Equifax Inc. 2,254 adults of the national public. (1990) . http://www.privacyexchange.org/iss/surveys/eqfx.execsum.1990.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Yerkes R., Dodson J. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J. Comparative Neurology Psych. (1908) 18:459–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H. Trust-promoting seals in electronic markets: Impact on online shopping decisions. J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (2004) 6(4):29–40Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.