Environmental Uncertainty and IT Infrastructure Governance: A Curvilinear Relationship

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0269

References

  • Adams C., Larson E., Xia W. A trend toward more centralized information technology management. (2008) . Working paper, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  • Ahituv N., Neumann S., Zviran M. Affecting the policy for distributing computing resources. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(4):389–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexander J. A. Adaptive change in corporate control practices. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):162–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand K. S., Mendelson H. Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1609–1627LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C. V. Examining the emergence of hybrid IS governance solutions: Evidence from a single case site. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):69–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C. V., Magill S. L. Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(4):371–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busija E. C., O'Neill H. M., Zeithaml C. P. Diversification strategy, entry mode, and performance: Evidence of choice and constraints. Strategy Management J. (1997) 18(4):321–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Collis D., Young D., Goold M. The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(4):383–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(1):52–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan N. B. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(2):37–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. (1985) 31(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fan J. P. H., Lang L. H. P. The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. J. Bus. (2000) 73(4):629–660CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. J., Laursen K. Performance pay, delegation and multitasking under uncertainty and innovativeness: An empirical investigation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2005) 58(2):246–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossack I. Towards an integration of static and dynamic measures of industry concentration. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1965) 47(3):301–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(4):768–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hann J., Weber R. Information systems planning: A model and empirical tests. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):1043–1064LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(2):24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. H. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H., Werin L., Wijkander H. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Contract Economics (1992) (Blackwell, Oxford) 251–274Google Scholar
  • Kahai P. S., Snyder C. A., Carr H. H. Decentralizing the IS function: Resources and locus of decisions. J. Comput. Inform. Sys. (2001) 42(2):44–50Google Scholar
  • Keats B. W., Hitt M. A. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(3):570–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lance C. E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1988) 12(2):163–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H., Whang S., Ahsan K., Gordon E., Faragalla A., Jain A., Mohsin A., Shi G. Harrah's Entertainment Inc.: Real-time CRM in a service supply chain. (2006) . Stanford Business School Case, GS–50, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B. R. Information technology and organization design: Locating decisions and information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1321–1335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M. H., Chervany N. L. The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services function. MIS Quart. (1980) 4(2):57–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):623–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):261–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shpilberg D., Berez S., Puryear R., Shah S. Avoiding the alignment trap in information technology. Sloan Management Rev. (2007) 49(1):49–58Google Scholar
  • Turban E., McKay J., Marshall P., Lee J., Viehland D.Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective (2006) (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):613–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade M., Hulland J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):107–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):960–976CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P., Broadbent M. Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Weill P., Ross J. A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. Sloan Management Rev. (2005) 46(2):26–34Google Scholar
  • Weill P., Subramani M., Broadbent M. Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 44(1):57–65Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.