Putting Yourself in the Picture: An Evaluation of Virtual Model Technology as an Online Shopping Tool

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0279

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):361–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auerbach C. F., Silverstein L. B.Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis (2003) (University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bearden W. O., Netemeyer R. G., Teel J. E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 15(4):473–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck B. Key strategic issues in online apparel retailing: The need for an online fitting solution. (2005) . Accessed May 15, 2007, http://www.techexchange.com/thelibrary/online_fit.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Bevan N., MacLeod M. Usability measurement in context. Behaviour Inform. Tech. (1994) 13(1):132–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell R. D., Miniard P. W., Engel J. F.Consumer Behavior (2006) (Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
  • Caracelli V. J., Greene J. C. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation Policy Anal. (1993) 15(2):195–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang C.-C. A., Burke R. R. Consumer choice of retail shopping aids. J. Retailing Consumer Services (2007) 14(5):339–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Creusen M. E. H., Schoormans J. P. L. The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J. Product Innovation Management (2005) 22(1):63–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danneels E. Market segmentation: Normative model versus business reality: An exploratory study of apparel retailing in Belgium. Eur. J. Marketing (1996) 30(6):36–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeBono K. G., Leavitt A., Backus J. Product packaging and product evaluation: An individual difference approach. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2003) 33(3):513–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar R., Nowlis S. M. To buy or not to buy: Response mode effects on consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):423–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engel J. F., Kollat D. T., Blackwell R. D.Consumer Behavior (1968) (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eyeglasses.com Try it on. (2007) . Accessed November 10, 2007, http://www.eyeglasses.com/tryiton/Google Scholar
  • Fitzsimons G. J. Consumer response to stockouts. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):249–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkes V. S. Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 10(4):398–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkes V. S. Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 14(4):548–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsythe S. M., Shi B. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. J. Bus. Res. (2003) 56(11):867–875CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Framesdirect.com Virtual eyeglass try-on. (2008) . Accessed August 6, 2008, http://www.framesdirect.com/framefinder.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Garvin D. A. What does product quality really mean? Sloan Management Rev. (1984) 26(1):25–43Google Scholar
  • Glassberg B. C., Grover V., Teng J. T. C. Information systems research with an attitude. ACM SIGMIS Database (2006) 37(2–3):76–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(1):105–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haeubl G., Trifts V. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):4–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargreaves G., Claxton J. D., Siller F. H. New product evaluation: Electric vehicles for commercial applications. J. Marketing (1976) 40(1):74–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herr P. M., Kardes F. R., Kim J. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):454–462CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):195–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Jacoby J., Szybillo G. J., Berning C. K. Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. J. Consumer Res. (1976) 2(4):320–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z., Benbasat I. The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers' product understanding. MIS Quart. (2007a) 31(3):475–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z., Benbasat I. Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Inform. Systems Res. (2007b) 18(4):454–472LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johar J. S., Sirgy M. J. Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. J. Advertising (1991) 20(3):23–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz D. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quart. (1960) 24(2):163–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A., Rao A. R. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing (2000) 64(2):66–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kling R. Reading “all about” computerization: How genre conventions shape nonfiction social analysis. Inform. Soc. (1994) 10(3):147–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Devaraj S., Mahmood M. A. Understanding determinants of online consumer satisfaction: A decision process perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):115–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lands' End Men's regular buttondown no iron pinpoint dress shirt. (2008) . Accessed January 21, 2009, www.landsend.comGoogle Scholar
  • Mulpuru S.The State of Retailing Online 2008 (2008) (Forrester Research and National Retail Federation, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Nausoft Plastic designer. (2007) . http://www.nausoft.net/eng/products/plastic/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver R. L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(3):418–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park C. W., Lessig V. P. Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. J. Consumer Res. (1981) 8(2):223–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park J. H., Stoel L. Apparel shopping on the Internet: Information availability on US apparel merchant Web sites. J. Fashion Marketing Management (2000) 6(2):158–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • QMS EViews 6.0 User guide to quantitative micro software. (2007) (QMS, Irvine, CA) Google Scholar
  • Regan K. Will online clothes ever fit? TechNewsWorld (2001) May 11, 2001Google Scholar
  • Reppel A. E., Szmigin I., Gruber T. The iPod phenomenon: Identifying a market leader's secrets through qualitative marketing research. J. Product Brand Management (2006) 15(4):239–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Resnik A., Stern B. L. An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 41(1):50–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ringle C. M., Wende S., Will A. (2005) . SmartPLS 2.0M3 (beta), accessed July 31, 2008, http://www.smartpls.deGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D. User attitudes and management information system use. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22(3):527–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shavitt S. Evidence for predicting the effectiveness of value-expressive versus utilitarian appeals: A reply to Johar and Sirgy. J. Advertising (1992) 21(2):47–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sismeiro C., Bucklin R. E. Modeling purchase behavior at an e-commerce Web site: A task-completion approach. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(3):306–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder M., DeBono K. G. Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 49(3):586–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Speier C., Vessey I., Valacich J. S. The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(4):771–797CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp J. B. E. M.Product Quality: An Investigation into the Concept, and How It Is Perceived by Consumers (1989) (Van Gorcum Assen, Maastricht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Stock J., Speh T., Shear H. Managing product returns for competitive advantage. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 48(1):57–62Google Scholar
  • Thomas D. M., Watson R. T. Q-sorting and MIS research: A primer. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2002) 8:141–156Google Scholar
  • U. S. Census BureauComputer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003. (2005) (U. S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • U. S. Census Bureau 2006 E-commerce multi-sector report. (2008) . Accessed July 31, 2008. http://www.census.gov/eos/www/2006/2006reportfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. (2008) 39(2):273–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):63–84LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J., Wallendorf M. Materialism, status signaling, and product satisfaction. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2006) 34(4):494–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L., Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Marketing (1996) 60(2):31–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeng M., Reinartz W. Beyond online search: The road to profitability. California Management Rev. (2003) 45(2):107–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.