Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement

References

• Anderson J. R.Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (1980) (W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Ballantine J., Bonner M., Levy M., Martin A., Munro I., Powell P. L., Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L. Developing a 3-D model of information systems success. Information Systems Success Measurement (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 46–59Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action (1986) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Blili S., Raymond L., Rivard S. Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end user computing. Inform. Management (1998) 33(3):137–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen W. The puny payoff from office computers. Fortune (1986) 121:20–24Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. The contribution of information technologies to consumer welfare. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(3):281–300Link, Google Scholar
• Bushnell D. S. Input, process, output: A model for evaluating training. Training Development J (1990) 44(3):41–43Google Scholar
• Buszowski F. A quick and inexpensive way to evaluate user training. Comput. Canada (1989) 16(20):22–23Google Scholar
• Cardy R. L., Keefe T. J. Observational purpose and evaluative articulation in frame-of-reference training: The effects of alternative processing modes on rating accuracy. Organ. Behaviour Human Decision Process. (1994) 57(3):338–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr M. As EUC moves to adulthood, IS is faced with new challenges. Comput. Canada (1990) 16(25):41Google Scholar
• Cheney P. H., Nelson R. R. A tool for measuring and analyzing end user computing abilities. Inform. Process. Management (1988) 24(2):199–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995a) 19(2):189–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995b) 6(2):118–143Link, Google Scholar
• Cotterman W. W., Kumar K. User cube: A taxonomy of end users. Comm. ACM (1989) 32(11):1313–1320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use,and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35:982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Day D. V., Sulsky L. M. Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80(1):158–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• De Young T., Perlman B. J. Microcomputer education: Prerequisite to productivity. Public Productivity Review (1985) 9(2/3):247–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans G. E., Simkin M. G. What best predicts computer proficiency?. Comm. ACM (1989) 32(11):1322–1327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Garrity E. J., Sanders G. L., Garrity E J., Sanders G. L. Dimensions of information systems success. Information Systems Success Measurement (1998) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 13–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutek B. A., Winter S.Measures of computer literacy in workgroups: Development and validation (1992) (Center for the Management of Information, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ) . Working Paper WPS 9201Google Scholar
• Harrison A. W., Rainer R. K. The in fiuence of individual differences on skill in end user computing. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(1):93–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayen R. L., Cook W. F., Jecker G. H. End user training in office automation: Matching expectations. J. Systems Management (1990) March):7–12Google Scholar
• Higginbotham J. S. The satisfaction equation. Res. Development (1997) 39(10):R–VGoogle Scholar
• Hopper M. D. Rattling SABRE: New ways to compete on information. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(May-June):118–125Google Scholar
• Hurt M.IS-user relationships: Factors which impact their perceived effectiveness and differences between is and users (1990) (University of Texas at Austin). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
• Industrial ManagementComputer literacy is not enough (1986) 10(8):40Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.The Frontiers of Management (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Karten N. The hidden costs of end-user computing. Inform. Strategy: The Executive's J. (1987) Spring:36–38Google Scholar
• Karten N. The myth of the sophisticated user. J. Inform. Systems Management (1988) 5(1):81–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karten N. Integrating IS disciplines into end-user training. J. Inform. Systems Management (1991) 8(1):75–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirk R. E.Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioural Sciences (1982) 2nd ed.(Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Klauk D. R. Office computers: An update. B & E Rev. (1988) 34(4):30–31Google Scholar
• Kraemer K. L., Northrop A. Curriculum recommendations for public management education in computing: An update. Public Admin. Rev. (1989) 49(5):447–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraiger K., Ford K., Salas E. Application of cognitive, skillbased and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(2):311–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamberti D. M., Wallace W. A. Intelligent interface design: An empirical assessment of knowledge presentation in expert systems. MIS Quart. (1990) 14(3):279–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little B. The have-nots of the new technology. The Globe and Mail (1997) 1020(Toronto, Ont)Google Scholar
• Mackay J. M., Elam J. J. A comparative study of how experts and novices use a decision aid to solve problems in complex knowledge domains. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(2):150–172Link, Google Scholar
• Magnet M. The productivity payoff arrives. Fortune (1994) 129(13):79–84Google Scholar
• Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):173–222Link, Google Scholar
• Marcolin B. L., Huff S. L., Munro M. C.End user sophistication: Measurement and research model (1992) Proc. of ASAC 1992 ConferenceQuebec:108–120Google Scholar
• McIntyre R. M., Smith D. E., Hassett C. Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):147–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miriani R., King W. R. Impacts of end-user and information center characteristics on end-user computing support. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 11(1):141–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Munro M. C., Huff S. L., Marcolin B. L., Compeau D. R. Understanding and measuring user competence. Inform. Management (1997) 33:46–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. Educational needs as perceived by IS and enduser personnel: A survey of knowledge and skill requirements. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(4):502–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Cheney P. H. Training end users: An exploratory study. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(4):547–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Olfman L., Bostrom R. P.End-user software training: An experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation (1990) (Information Science Applications Center. The Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA) . Working paper 02-90Google Scholar
• Panko R.End User Computing: Management, Applications and Technology (1988) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Peter J. P. Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(February):6–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rainer R. K., Harrison A. W. Toward development of the end user computing construct in a university setting. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(6):1187–1199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivard S., Huff S. L. Factors of success for end-user computing. Comm. ACM. (1988) 31(5):552–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockart J., Flannery L. The management of end user computing. Comm. ACM. (1983) 26(10):776–784Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal B. E. Managing end-user computing. Banking Software Rev. (1990) 15(5):28–33Google Scholar
• Schroeder D. L., Kletke M. The development and validation of an instrument for assessing relative expertise levels among microcomputer end users. Proc. 1990 Ann. Meeting Decision Sci. Institute. (1990) 1096–1098Google Scholar
• Schunk D. H. Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. J. Ed. Psych. (1981) 73:93–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seddon P. B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253Link, Google Scholar
• Skills Evaluation System (SES)User's Guide, Version 3.0 (1990) (developed by Canadian Skills Development Centre, Hamilton, Ont) Google Scholar
• Stamoulis D. T., Hauenstein M. A. Rater training and rating accuracy:Training for dimensional accuracy versus training for rate differentiation. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(6):994–1003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart Tom. Intellectual Capital (1997) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Suh K. S., Jenkins A. M. A comparison of linear keyword and restricted natural language data base interfaces for novice users. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(3):252–272Link, Google Scholar
• Swope C., Mahometa M. Making the MIS department part of the benefits team. J. Compensation Benefits (1987) 3(2):100–102Google Scholar
• Symons V. A fine mesh at IBM. Training (1987) 24(4):49–53Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):142–176Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson R. L., Higgins C. A., Howell J. M. Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quart. (1991) 15:125–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson R. L., Higgins C. A., Howell J. M. Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 11(1):167–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsay J., Solomon L. Computer and systems literacy: Academic vs. practitioner perspectives. Interface (1988) 8(2):10–16Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F., DeGross J., Huff S., Munro M.Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use (1996) Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems(Vancouver, Canada)213–227Google Scholar
• Webster J.The relationship between playfulness of computer interactions and employee productivity (1989) Conf. Desktop Inform. Tech.Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Webster J., Martocchio J.J. Turning work into play: Implications for microcomputer software training. J. Management. (1993) 19(1):127–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. J., Gutek B. A., Chudoba K. M.Misplaced resources? Factors associated with computer literacy among endusers (1992) Proc. ICIS 1992 Conf.Dallas, Texas:149–160Google Scholar
• Woehr D. J. Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(4):525–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zmud R. W.Information Systems in Organizations (1983) (Scott Foresman & Co, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar