Using Repertory Grids to Conduct Cross-Cultural Information Systems Research

References

  • Bannister D., Mair J. M. M.The Evaluation of Personal Constructs (1968) (Academic Press, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Barrett M., Walsham G. Managing IT for business innovation: Issues of culture, learning and leadership in a Jamaican insurance company. J. Global Inform. Management. (1995) 3(3):3–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry J. W., Headland T. N., Pike K. L., Harris M. Imposed-etics, emics, and derived-etics: Their conceptual and operational status in cross-cultural psychology. Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Berry J. W., Triandis H. C., Berry J. W. Introduction to methodology. Handbook of Cross Cultural Psychology (1980) 2.(Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Botten Nancy, Andrew Kusiak, Tzvi Raz. Knowledge bases: Integration, verification, and partitioning. European J. Oper. Res. (1989) 42(2):111–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burn J., Saxena K. B. C., Ma L., Cheung H. K. Critical issues in IS management in Hong Kong: A cultural comparison. J. Global Inform. Management (1993) 1(4):28–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corsini Raymond, Marsella Anthony J.Personality Theories, Research and Assessment (1983) (Peacock Publishers, Inc., Itasca, IL) Google Scholar
  • Earley P. C., Mosakowski E., Punnett B. J., Shenkar O. A framework for understanding experimental researchin an international and intercultural context. Handbook of International Management Research (1995) (Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Eden Colin, Jones Sue. Using repertory grids for problem construction. J. Oper. Res. (1984) 35(9):779–798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eden Colin, Wheaton Gordon. In Favour of Structure (1980) (Centre for the Study of Organisational Change and Development, University of Bath). Working Paper 80/06Google Scholar
  • Ein-Dor P., Segev E., Orgad M. The effect of national culture on IS: Implications for international information systems. J. Global Inform. Management (1993) 1(1):33–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fitzgerald G., Hirschheim R. A., Mumford E., Woodharper A. T., Mumford E., et al. Information systems researchmethodology: An introduction to the debate. Research Methods in Information Systems (1985) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)3–9Google Scholar
  • Fransella Fay. Personality—Theory, Measurement and Research (1981) (Methuen and Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • Galliers Robert D.Information Systems Research—Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines (1992) (Alfred Waller Ltd., Henley-on-Thames, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Galliers Robert D., Land Frank F. Choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies. Comm. ACM. (1987) 30(11):900–902CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallupe R. B., Tan F. B. A research manifesto for global information management. J. Global Inform. Management (1999) 7(3):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser Barney G., Strauss Anselm L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine De Gruyter, New York) Google Scholar
  • Harvey F. National cultural differences in theory and practice: Evaluating Hofstede's national cultural framework. Inform., Tech. & People (1997) 10(2):132–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Headland T. N., Pike K. L., Harris M.Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hill C. E., Loch K. D., Straub D., El-Sheshai K. A qualitative assessment of Arab culture and information technology transfer. J. Global Inform. Management (1998) 6(3):29–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschheim R. Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. Information Systems Research—Issues, Methods, and Practical Guidelines (1992) (Alfred Waller, Henley-on Thames, U.K.) 61–68Google Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (1980) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1983) Fall):75–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert, Harris Bond Michael. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organ. Dynamics (1988) 16(4):4–21Google Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert, Neuijen Bram, Daval Ohayv Denise, Sanders Geert. Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:286–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede Geert. Cultural constraints in management theories. Acad. Management Executive (1993) 7(1):81–94Google Scholar
  • Hunter M. Gordon. A strategy for identifying “excellent” systems analysts. J. Strategic Informa. Systems (1993) 2(1):15–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter M. Gordon. “Excellent” systems analysts: Key audience perceptions. Comput. Personnel (1994) (ACM Press)15–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter M. Gordon, Beck John E.A cross-cultural comparison of “excellent” systems analysts (1994) (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore) . Working paper IMARC WP No. 7-94Google Scholar
  • Kelly G. A.The Psychology of Personal Constructs (1955) (Norton, NewYork) Google Scholar
  • Kelly G. A.A Theory of Personality (1963) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Klein H. K., Lyytinen K., Mumford E., Hirschhein R., Fitzgerald G., Wood-Harper A. T. The poverty of scientism in information systems. Research Methods in Information Systems (1985) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)131–161Google Scholar
  • Latta Gail F., Swigger Keith. Validation of the repertory grid for use in modelling knowledge. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1992) 42(2):115–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lending D., Wetherbe J. C. “Update on MIS research: A profile of leading journals and U.S. universities. Database (1992) 23(3):5–11Google Scholar
  • Pervin Lawrence A.Personality—Theory and Research (1989) 5th ed.(John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Phythian, John Gary, King Malcolm. Developing an expert system for tender enquiry evaluation: A case study. European J. Oper. Res. (1992) 56(1):15–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pike R.Language in relation to a united theory of the structure of human behavior (1954) (Summer Institute of Linguistics, Glendale, AZ) Google Scholar
  • Ronen s.Comparative and Multinational Management (1986) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shaw Mildred L. G.On Becoming a Personal Scientist—Interactive Computer Elicitation of Personal Models of the World (1980) (Academic Press, Inc., London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Slaughter S., Ang S. Information systems employment structures in the USA and Singapore: A cross-cultural comparison. Inform., Tech. People (1995) 8(2):17–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart Valerie, Stewart Andrew. Business Applications of Repertory Grid (1981) (McGraw-Hill Ltd., London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Straub D. The effect of culture on IT diffusion: Email and Fax in Japan and the US. Inform. Sys. Res. (1994) 5(1):23–47LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan M., Igbaria M. Turnover and remuneration of information technology professionals in Singapore. Informa. Management (1994) 26(4):219–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis H. C.Analysis of Subjective Culture (1972) (Wiley Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
  • Webber R. H. Convergence and divergence. Columbia J. World Bus. (1969) 4(3):75–83Google Scholar
  • Yang K. S., Bond M. H. Will societal modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences. The Cross-Cultural Challenge to Social Psychology (1986) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.