The Role of Multimedia in Changing First Impression Bias

References

  • Aldag R. J., Power D. J. An empirical assessment of computer-assisted decision analysis. Decision Sci. (1986) 17:572–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyle M., Alkema F., Gilmour R. The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. European J. Soc. Psych. (1971) 1:385–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyle M., Salter V., Nicholson H., Williams M., Burgess P. The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals. British J. Soc. Clinical Psych. (1970) 9:222–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch S. E. Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1946) 41:1230–1240Google Scholar
  • Baggett P., Mandl H., Levin J. R. Understanding visual and verbal messages. Knowledge Acquisition From Text and Pictures, Elsevier (1989) (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 101–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baggett P., Ehrenfeucht A. Information in content equivalent movie and text stories. Discourse Process (1982) 5:73–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baggett P., Ehrenfeucht A. Encoding and retaining information in the visuals and verbals of an educational movie. Ed. Comm. Tech. J. (1983) 31:23–32Google Scholar
  • Beagles-Roos J., Gat I. Specific impact of radio and television on children's story comprehension. J. Ed. Psych. (1983) 75:128–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. An experimental evaluation of graphical and color-enhanced information presentation. Management Sci. (1985) 11:1348–1364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Quart. (1986) 10:59–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cognitive and Technology Groupat Vanderbilt Examining the cognitive challenges and pedagogical opportunities of integrated media systems: Toward a research agenda. J. Special Ed. Tech. (1993) 12:118–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Staw B., Cummings L. L. Information richness: A new approach to manager information processing and organization design. Researchin Organizational Behavior (1984) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 191–233Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–71LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Macintosh N. B. A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:207–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1987) 11:355–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denison D. R.Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness (1990) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ekman P., Friesen W. V. Detecting deception from the body or face. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1974) 29:288–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S.T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) (McGraw Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forer B. R. The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. J. Abnormal and Soc. Psych. (1949) 44:118–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen E. J. Interactive video for reflection: Learning theory and a new use of the medium. Ed. Tech. (1989) 29:7–15Google Scholar
  • Hayes D. S., Kelly S. B. Young children's processing of television: Modality differences in the retention of temporal relations. J. Experiment. Child Psych. (1984) 38:505–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes D. S., Kelly S. B., Mandel M. Media differences in children's story synopses: Radio and television contrasted. J. Ed. Psych. (1986) 78:341–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. The effect of task and graphical format congruence on information processing strategies and decision making performance. Management Sci. (1989) 35:285–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Goethals G., Jones E. E., et al. Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context and the nature of the entity. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (1972) (Silver Burdett/General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Jones E. E., Rock L., Shaver K. G., Goethals G. R., Ward L. M. Patterns of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1968) 10:317–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D.Attention and Effort (1973) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly H. H. The warm-cold variable in first impression of persons. J. Personality (1950) 18:431–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korda M.Power (1976) (Ballatine Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lana R. E. Three theoretical interpretations of order effects in persuasive communications. Psych. Bull. (1964) 61:314–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin J. H., Simon H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn. Sci. (1987) 11:65–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary M. R.Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior (1995) (WCB Communications, Dubuque, IA) Google Scholar
  • Levie W., Lentz R. Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Ed. Comm. Tech. J. (1982) 30:195–232Google Scholar
  • Lim K. H.Multimedia as an enabling technology for enhancing organizational memory to support decision making (1996) (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C) . Unpublished Ph.D. DissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Lim L. H.Impact of group support systems on judgement biases: An experimental investigation (1995) (The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C) . Unpublished Doctoral DissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Luchins A. S., Hovland C. Experimental attempts to minimize the impact of first impressions. The Order of Presentation in Persuasian (1957) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B., Jessupand L. M., Valacich J. S. Putting the ‘group’ back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. Group Support Systems: New perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York) 78–96Google Scholar
  • Motowidlo S. J., Burnett J. R. Aural and visual sources of validity in structured employment interviews. Organ. Behavior and Human Decision Process. (1995) 61:239–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett R., Ross L.Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Oskamp S. Overconfidence in case study judgements. J. Consulting Psych. (1965) 29:261–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paivio A. Imagery and deepstructure in the recall of english nominalizations. J. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1971) 10:1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao V. S., Goldman-Segall R., Sprague R. H., Nunamake J. F. Capturing stories in organizational memory systems: The role of multimedia. Twenty-Eight Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1995) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 333–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Remus W. E. An empirical investigation of the impact of graphical and tabular data presentations on decision making. Management Sci. (1984) 30:533–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenhan D. L. On being sane in insane places. Science (1973) 179:250–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy M. C., Lerch F. J. Overcoming ineffective mental representations in base-rate problems. Inform. Systems. Res. (1996) 7:233–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salomon G.Interaction of Media, Cognition and Learning (1979) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Schlenker B. R.Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (1980) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
  • Smart Video Recorder ProIntel Corporation (1994) (Hillsboro, OR)Google Scholar
  • Snyder C. R. Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. J. Consulting and Clinical Psych. (1974) 42:150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder C. R., Larson G. R. A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. J. Consulting and Clinical Psych. (1972) 38:384–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sprague R.H. Electronic document management for information systems managers. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1995) 19:29–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein E. W., Zwass V. Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6:85–117LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan J. K. H., Benbasat I. The effectiveness of graphical presentation for information. Decision Sci. (1990) 24:167–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P. A., Benbasat I. An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids on decision making processes. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:87–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P. A., Benbasat I. The use of information in decision making: An experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1992) 16:373–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich R. E., Stachnik T. J., Stainton N. R. Student Acceptance of Generalized Personality Interpretations. Psych. Report (1963) 13:831–834CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vessey I. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:219–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) (AddisonWesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wetzel C. D., Radtke P. H., Stern H. W.Instructional Effectiveness of Video Media (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.