How Do We Understand a System with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning

References

• Baddeley A. D.Working Memory (1986) (Clarendon, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Beedle M. A. Object-based reengineering. Object Magazine (1995) March–April:53–58Google Scholar
• Bolles E. B.A Second Way of Knowing (1991) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Booch G.Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications (1994) (Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Redwood City, CA) Google Scholar
• Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I.The Unified Modeling Language User Guide (1999) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Champy J.Reengineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership (1995) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran B., Glasgow J., Narayanan N. H., Glasgow J., Narayanan N. H., Chandrasekaran B. Introduction. Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (1995) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) xv–xxGoogle Scholar
• Cheng P. C.-H., Cottrell G. W.Functional roles for the cognitive analysis of diagrams in problem solving (1996) Proc. Eighteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc.(San Diego, CA Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 207–212Google Scholar
• Cheng P., Simon H. A., Smith S., Ward T., Finke R. Scientific discovery and creative reasoning with diagrams. The Creative Cognition Approach (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 205–228Google Scholar
• Coad P., Yourdon E.Object-Oriented Analysis (1990) (Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cook R. I., Potter S. D., Woods D. D., McDonald J. S. Evaluating the human engineering of microprocessor controlled operating room devises. J. Clinical Monitoring (1991) 7:217–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis B., Kellner M., Over J. Process modeling. Comm. ACM (1992) 35(9):75–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H.Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Edelman S., Cutzu F., Duvdevani-Bar S., Cottrell G. W.Similarity to reference shapes as a basis for shape representation: Lexical ambiguity and semantic representation (1996) Proc. Eighteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Society(San Diego, CA, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 260–265Google Scholar
• Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A.Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (1993) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Forbus K., Nielson P., Faltings B. Qualitative spatial reasoning: The CLOCK project. Artificial Intelligence (1991) 51(1–3):417–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good J., Gray W. D., Boehm-Davis D. A. The “right” tool for the task: An investigation of external representations, program abstractions and task requirements. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Sixth Workshop (1996) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) 77–98Google Scholar
• Green T. R. G., Petre M., Bellamy R. K. E., Koenemann-Belliveau J., Moher T. G., Robertson S. P. Comprehensibility of visual and textual programs: A test of superlativism against the “match-mismatch” conjecture. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fourth Workshop (1991) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) 121–146Google Scholar
• Hahn H., Hahn J., Kim J., Nunamaker J. F., Sprague R. H.A cognitive engineering study on the development of an object-oriented process modeling formalism (1997) Proc. of Proc. the Thirtieth Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS-30)(Maui, HI, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alametos, CA) 199–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammer M.Beyond Reengineering (1996) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Hammer M., Champy J.Reengineering the Corporation (1993) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Iwasaki Y., Glasgow J., Narayanan N. H., Chandrasekaran B. Problem Solving with Diagrams. Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (1995) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 657–668Google Scholar
• Jacobson I.Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach (1992) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Jacobson I.The Object Advantage: Business Process Reengineering with Object Technology (1995) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Jordan E. W., Machesky J. J.System Development: Requirements, Evaluation, Design and Implementation (1990) (PWS-KENT, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Kim J., Lerch F. J. Why is programming (sometimes) so difficult? Programming as scientific discovery in multiple problem spaces. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):25–50Link, Google Scholar
• Koedinger K. R., Anderson J. R. Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Sci. (1990) 14:511–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin J., Simon H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Sci. (1987) 11(1):65–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Stevenson R. J. Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Appl. Ergonom. (1996) 27(1):61–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan N. H., Suwa M., Motoda H., Glasgow J., Narayanan N. H., Chandrasekaran B. Hypothesizing behaviors from device diagrams. Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (1995) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 501–534Google Scholar
• Newell A., Simon H. A.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Pancake C. M. The promise and the cost of object technology: A five year forecast. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(10):33–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennington N., Olson G. M., Sheppard S., Soloway E. Comprehension strategies in programming. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop (1987) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) 100–113Google Scholar
• Pressman R.Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (1992) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• RationalThe unified modeling language ver. 0.9 (1996) (Rational Software Corporation, Santa Clara, CA) Google Scholar
• Rist R. Schema creation in programming. Cognitive Sci. (1989) 13(3):389–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E., Glasgow J., Narayanan N. H., Chandrasekaran B. A cognitive theory of visual interaction. Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (1995) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 481–500Google Scholar
• Rogers E., Cottrell G. W.A study of visual reasoning in medical diagnosis (1996) Proc. Eighteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc.(San Diego, CA. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 213–218Google Scholar
• Rumbaugh J., Blaha M., Premerlani W., Eddy F., Lorensen W.Object-Oriented Modeling and Design (1991) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A., Lea G., Gregg W. Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. Knowledge and Cognition (1974) (Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 105–128Google Scholar
• Tabachneck H. J. M., Leonardo A. M., Simon H. A., Ram A., Eiselt K.How does an expert use a graph?: A model of visual and verbal inferencing in economics (1994) Proc. Sixteenth Ann. Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc.(Atlanta, GA. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 842–847Google Scholar
• Taylor D. A.Business Engineering with Object Technology (1995) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Vessey I. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sci. (1991) 22(2):219–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):63–84Link, Google Scholar
• Winograd T. From programming environments to environments for designing. Comm. ACM. (1995) 38(6):65–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woods D. D., Flash J., Hancock P., Caird J., Vicente K. Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: Ecological perception and aiding human cognition. An Ecology of Human-Machine Systems: A Global Perspectives (1995) (Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 157–188Google Scholar
• Woods D. D., Watts J. C., Helander M. G., Landauer T. K., Prabhu P. V. How not to have to navigate through too many displays. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (1997) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 617–650Crossref, Google Scholar