Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments

References

  • Adler R. Distributed coordination models for client/server computing. IEEE Comput. (1995) 28(4):14–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson T., Breitbart Y., Korth H., Wool A. Replication, consistency, and practicality: Are these mutually exclusive? Proc. SIGMOD Conf. (1998) (Seattle, WA)484–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews G. Paradigms for process interaction in distributed programs. ACM Comput. Surveys (1991) 23(1):49–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold V., Bosch R., Dumstorff E., Helfrich P., Hung T., Johnson V., Persik R., Whidden P. IBM business frameworks: San Francisco project technical overview. IBM Systems J. (1997) 36(3):437–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badrinath B., Imielinski T., T. Imielinski, H. Korth. Mobile Computing (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers)29–152Location management for networks with mobile usersGoogle Scholar
  • Barbara D. Mobile computing and databases-A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engnrg. (1999) 11(1):108–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batini C., Lenzirini M., Navathe S. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surveys (1986) 18(4):323–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein P., Newcomer E.Principles of Transaction Processing for the Systems Professional (1997) (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc)Google Scholar
  • Bohrer K., Johnson V., Nilsson A., Rubin B. Business process components for distributed object applications. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(6):43–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brancheau J., Janz B., Wetherbe J. Key issues in information systems management: 1994–95 SIM Delphi results. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):225–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown A., Wallnau K. The current state of CBSE. IEEE Software (1998) 15(5):37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown C., Gasser L., O′Leary D., Sangster A. AI on the WWW: Supply and demand agents. IEEE Expert (1995) 10(4):50–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandra J., March S., Mukherjee S., Pape W., Ramesh R., Rao R., Waddoups R. Information systems frontiers. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(1):71–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri S., Dayal U. An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. ACM SIGMOD Record (1997) 26(1):65–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christ R., Halter S., Lynne K., Meizer S., Munroe S., Pasch M. San Francisco performance: A case study in performance for large-scale java applications. IBM System J. (2000) 39(1):4–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DARPAHarnessing the Power of Netcentricity: A National Research Agenda (1999) (Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland, College Park, MD) Google Scholar
  • Datta A., Vandermeer D., Celik A., Kumar V. Broadcast protocols to support efficient retrieval from databases by mobile users. ACM Trans. Database Systems (1999) 24(1):1–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixon N. M.Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA) Google Scholar
  • Ellison R., Linger R., Longstaff T., Mead N. Survivable network system analysis: A case study. IEEE Software (1999) 16(4):70–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fayyad U., Uthurusamy R. Data mining and knowledge discovery in databases. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(11):24–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fidge C., Kearney P., Utting M. A formal method for building concurrent, real-time software. IEEE Software (1997) 14(2):99–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg V. Methods for observing global properties in distributed systems. IEEE Concurrency (1997) 5(4):69–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner F. Fundamentals of fault-tolerant distributed computing in asynchronous environments. ACM Comput. Surveys (1999) 31(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein R., Storey V. The commonsense business reasoner. Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. Database and Expert Systems Appl. (DEXA) (1991) (Berlin, Germany)124–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guttman M., Matthews J.The Object Technology Revolution (1995) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Harrison A.Computerworld (2000) 0214(Computerworld Inc). University computer used in WebattacksGoogle Scholar
  • Hevner A., Berndt D., M. Zelkowitz. Advances in Computers, Vol. 52 (2000) (Academic Press, Ltd). Eras of business computingGoogle Scholar
  • Imielinski T., Viswanathan S., Badrinath B. Data on air: Organization and access. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (1997) 9(3):353–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jakiela H. Performance visualization of a distributed system: A case study. IEEE Comput. (1995) 28(11):30–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z., Kleinrock L.IEEE Personal Comm. (1998) 10:25–34Webprefetching in a mobile environmentGoogle Scholar
  • Jing J., Helal A., Elmagarmid A. Client-server computing in mobile environments. ACM Comput. Surveys (1999) 31(2):117–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kashyap V., Sheth A. Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: A context-based approach. VLDB J. (1996) 5(4):276–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kavi K., Browne J., Tripathi A. Computer systems research: The pressure is on. IEEE Comput. (1999) 32(1):30–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim W., Seo J. Classifying schematic and data heterogeniety in multidatabase systems. IEEE Comput. (1991) 24(12):12–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinrock L. Distributed systems. Comm. ACM. (1985) 28(11):1200–1213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnamurthi G., Azizoglu M., Somani A. Optimal location management algorithms for mobile networks. Proc. MOBICOM ′98 (1998) (Dallas, TX)223–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu L., Zicari R., Hursch W., Lierberherr K. The role of polymorphic reuse mechanisms in schema evolution in object-oriented databases. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engrg. (1997) 9(1):50–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madnick S. The challenge: To be part of the solution instead of being the problem. Proc. Workshop on Inform. Tech. Systems (1992) (Dallas TX)Google Scholar
  • March S., Wood C., Allen G. Research frontiers in object technology. Inform. Systems Frontiers (1999) 1(1):75–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melliar-Smith P., Moser L. Surviving network partitioning. IEEE Comput. (1998) 31(3):62–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters R., Ozsu T. An axiomatic model for dynamic schema evolution in objectbase systems. ACM Trans. Database Systems. (1997) 22(1):75–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfleeger C., Cooper D. Security and privacy: Promising advances. IEEE Software (1997) 14(5):27–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ra Y., Rudensteiner E. A transparent schema evolution system based on object oriented view technology. IEEE Trans. Data and Knowledge Engrg. (1997) 9(4):600–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ram S., Park J., Lee D. Digital libraries in the next millennium: State of the art and research directions. Inform. Systems Frontiers (1999a) 1(1):75–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ram S., Park J., Ball G. Semantic model support for geographic information systems. IEEE Comput. (1999b) 32(5):74–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ram S., Park J., Kim K., Hwang Y. A comprehensive framework for classifying data and schema level semantic conflicts in geographic and non-geographic databases. Proc. Ninth Workshop on Inform. Tech. Systems. (1999c) 185–190Google Scholar
  • Ram S., Ramesh V., A. Elmagarmid, M. Rusinkiewicz, A. Sheth. Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems (1999) (Morgan Kaufman)119–155Schema integration: Past, present and futureGoogle Scholar
  • Ram S., Shankar G. (2000) . Automating dynamic schema evolution in a heterogeneous database environment: Possibility or a pipe dream? Working paper, Department of MIS, College of BPA, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  • Rover D., Waheed A., Mutka M., Bakic A. Software tools for complex distributed systems: Toward integrated tool environments. IEEE Concurrency (1998) 6(2):40–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Satyanarayanan M. Fundamental challenges in mobile computing. Proc. ACM Sympos. Principles of Distributed Comput. (1996) (Philadelphia PA)1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheth A. Semantic interoperability in infocosm: Beyond infrastructural and data interoperability in federated information systems. Keynote talk. Internat. Conf. Interoperating Geographic Systems (1997) (Santa Barbara, CA). (Interop ′97)Google Scholar
  • Sheth A., Larson J. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput. Surveys (1990) 22(3):184–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • St. Laurent S., Cerami E.Building XML Applications (1999) (McGraw-Hill)Google Scholar
  • Storey V., Goldstein R., Chiang R., Dey D., Sundaresan S. Database design with common sense business reasoning and learning. ACM Trans. Database Systems (1997) 22(4):471–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan R. L.Electronic Commerce with EDI (1999) (Twain, Inc) Google Scholar
  • Tsichritzis D. Reengineering the university. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uschold M. Ontologies: Principles methods and applications. Knowledge Engrg. Rev. (1996) 11(2):93–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R., Strong D. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) Spring):5–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiderhold G. Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Comput. (1992) 25(3):38–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Welling G., Badrinath B. An architecture for exporting environment awareness to mobile computing applications. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1998) 24(5):391–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.