Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups

References

• Angehrn A. A., Jelassi T. DSS research and practice in perspective. Decision Support Systems (1994) 12(4):267–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anson R., Bostrom R., Wynne V. An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes. Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):189–208Link, Google Scholar
• Balzer W. K., Doherty M. E., O’Connor R. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bull. (1989) 106:410–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1986) 5(16):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Lim L-H. The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(4):430–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird S. D., Kasper G. M. Problem formalization techniques for collaborative systems. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1995) 25(2):231–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjorkman M. Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: notes on a neglected issue. Scand. J. Psych. (1972) 13:152–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box G. E. P. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: 1. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Ann. Math. Statist. (1954) 25:290–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockhoff K. Experimental test of MCDM algorithms in a modular approach. European J. Oper. Res. (1985) 22:159–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan J. T. An experimental evaluation of interactive MCDM methods and the decision making process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1994) 45(9):1050–1059Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan J. T., Daellenbach H. G. A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models. European J. Oper. Res. (1987) 29:353–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buede D. Software review: Overview of the MCDA software market. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1992) 1:59–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buede D., Maxwell. Rank disagreement: A comparison of multicriteria methodologies. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1995) 4:1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bui X. T. Building effective multiple criteria decision models: A decision support system approach. Systems Objectives, Solutions (1984) 4(Association for Computing Machinery, New York) 3–16Google Scholar
• Bui X. T., Jarke M. A DSS for cooperative multiple criteria group decision making. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1984) 101–113Google Scholar
• Cass K., Heintz T. J., Kaiser K. M. An investigation of satisfaction when using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed meetings. Inform. Management (1992) 23(10):173–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cats-Baril W. L., Huber G. P. Decision support systems for ill-structured problems: An empirical study. Decision Sci. (1987) 19:350–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W.PLS-Graph manual (1994) (University of Calgary 2500 University Drive N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4) Google Scholar
• Clawson V. K., Bostrom R. P., Anson R. The role of facilitator in computer-supported meetings. Small Group Res. (1993) 24:547–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Haley B., Vandenberg R. J., J. I. DeGross, S. Jarvenpaa, A Srinivasan. Proc. Seventeenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1996) (Cleveland, OH)278–289A meta-analysis of effectiveness, efficiency, and participant satisfaction in group support systems researchGoogle Scholar
• DeSanctis G., D’Onofrio M., Sambamurthy V., Poole M. S. Comprehensiveness and restriction in group decision heuristics: effects of computer support on consensus decision making. Proc. Tenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1989) (Boston, MA)131–140Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Snyder J. R., Poole M. S. The meaning of the interface: A functional and holistic evaluation of a meeting software system. Decision Support Systems: Internat. J. (1994) 11:319–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal J. S., Benbasat I. The use and effects of knowledge-based system explanations: Theoretical foundations and a framework for empirical evaluation. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(3):342–362Link, Google Scholar
• Dickson G. W., DeSanctis G., Poole M. S., Limayem M. Multicriteria modeling and “what if” analysis as conflict management tools for group decision making. Proc. 11th Internat. Decision Support Systems Conf. (1991) (The Institute of Management Sciences, Providence, RI) Google Scholar
• Dickson G. W., Lee-Partridge J. E., Robinson L. Exploring modes of facilitative support for GDSS technology. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(2):173–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson G. W., Poole M. S., DeSanctis G., R. P. Bostrom, R. Watson, S. T. Kinney. Computer augmented teamwork: A guided tour (1992) (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)163–179An overview of the Minnesota GDSS research project and the SAMM systemGoogle Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Fishburn P. C., Steuer R. E., Wallenius J., Zionts S. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):645–654Link, Google Scholar
• Easton A. C., Vogel D. R., Nunamaker J. F. Stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: An experimental study. Proc. Twenty-Second Ann. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1989) 3:344–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman and Hall, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans G. W. An overview of techniques for solving multiobjective mathematical programs. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1268–1282Link, Google Scholar
• Friedman P. Upstream facilitation: a proactive approach to managing problem-solving groups. Management Comm. Quart. (1989) 3(1):33–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J. F., Dennis A. R., Nunamaker J. F. An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room. Group Decision and Negotiation (1992) 1:57–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouran D., Brown C., Henry D. Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision making discussions. Comm. Monographs (1978) 45:51–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S. G., Taber T. D. The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group processes. Organ. Behavior and Human Performance (1980) 25:97–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S., Benbasat I. Explanations from intelligent systems: Theoretical foundations and implications for practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1999) 23(4):497–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Kaplan R. E. Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sci. (1974) 5:459–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W.Multivariate Data Analysis With Readings (1995) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall International Editions, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hayes W.Statistics (1981) 3rd ed.(Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Hightower R., Sayeed L. Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):451–465Link, Google Scholar
• Hiltz S. R., Dufner D., Holmes M., Poole S. Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas. J. Organ. Comp. (1991) 1:135–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T. H., Raman K. S., Watson R. T., J. DeGross, J. C. Henderson, B. R. Konsynski. Proc. Tenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1989) (Association for Computing Machinery, Baltimore, MD) 119–129Group decision support systems: the cultural factorGoogle Scholar
• Keen P., W G., Scott Morton M.Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective (1978) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1976) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kottemann J. E., Davis F. D. Decisional conflict and user acceptance of multicriteria decision-making aids. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:918–926Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M. (1992) . Automating decision guidance: design and impacts in a group decision environment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Mackay J. M., Elam J. J. A comparative study of how experts and novices use a decision aid to solve problems in complex knowledge domains. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3:150–172Link, Google Scholar
• Malloy T. E., Mitchell C., Gordon O. E. Training cognitive strategies underlying intelligent problem solving. Perceptual and Motor Skills (1987) 64:1039–1046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minch R. P., Sanders G. L. Computerized information systems supporting multicriteria decision making. Decision Sci. (1986) 17(3):395–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R., Vickery S. K. An experimental evaluation of articulation of preferences in multiple criterion decision-making (MCDM) methods. Decision Sci. (1988) 19:880–888Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kuther M. H.Regression Analysis of Variance and Experimental Designs (1985) 2nd ed(Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) . Applied linear statistical modelsGoogle Scholar
• Niederman F., DeSanctis G. The impact of a structured-argument approach on group problem formulation. Dec. Sci. (1996) 26(4):451–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson D. L., Moshkovich H. M., Schellenberger R., Mechitov A. Consistency and accuracy in decision aids: experiments with four multiattribute systems. Decision Sci. (1995) 26(6):723–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S. Decision development in small groups: I. A comparison of two models. Comm. Monographs (1981) 48:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S. Decision development in small groups: II. A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Comm. Monographs (1983a) 50(3):206–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S. Decision Development in Small Groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Comm. Monographs (1983b) 50(4):321–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., DeSanctis G. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. C. Steinfield and J. Fulk, eds. Perspectives on Organizations and New Information Technology (1990) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Reagan-Cirincione P., J. F. Nunamaker. Proc. 25th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1991) (IEEE Computer Society)232–243Combining group facilitation, decision modeling, and information technology to improve the accuracy of group judgmentGoogle Scholar
• Saaty T. L. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1986) 32:7Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V. (1989) (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) . Supporting group performance during stakeholder analysis: The effects of alternative computer-based designs. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
• Sengupta K., Abdel-Hamid T. K. An investigation of alternative feedback strategies in dynamic decision making. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):411–428Link, Google Scholar
• Sengupta K., Te’eni D. Cognitive feedback in GDSS: improving control and convergence. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(1):87–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver M. S.Systems that support decision makers: Description and analysis (1990) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester UK) Google Scholar
• Silver M. S. Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):105–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spillman B., Bezdek J., Spillman R. Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus. Comm. Monographs (1980) 46:1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steeb R., Johnston S. C.IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1981) 544–552A computer-based interactive system for group decision making SMC-11Google Scholar
• Tavana M., Kennedy D. T., Joglekar P. A. Group decision support framework for consensus ranking of technical manager candidates. Omega, Internat. J. Management Sci. (1996) 24(5):523–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Te’eni D. Feedback in DSS: experiments with the timing of feedback. Decision Sci. (1991) 22:644–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuttle B., Stocks M. H. The effects of task information and outcome feedback on individual insight into their decision models. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(2):421–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vargas Luis G. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European J. Oper. Res. (1990) 48:2–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Nitzsch R., Weber M. The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurements. Management Sci. (1993) 39(8):937–944Link, Google Scholar
• Watson R. T. (1987) (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) . A study of group decision support system use in three and four-person groups for a preference allocation decision Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationGoogle Scholar
• Watson R. T., DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(3):463–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C., Valacich J. S. Facilitation, GSS, and training as sources of process restrictiveness and guidance for structured group decision making: An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):429–450Link, Google Scholar
• Zigurs I., Poole M. S., DeSanctis G. Computer support of group decision making: A communication-based investigation. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(4):625–644Crossref, Google Scholar