Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):204–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Madden T. J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. J. Experiment. Social Psych. (1986) 22(5):453–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Adams N. E., Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J. Personality and Social Psych. (1977) 35:125–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ajzen I.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
  • Brody E. B., Hatfield B. D., Spalding T. W. Generalization of self-efficacy to a continuum of stressors upon mastery of a high-risk sport skill. J. Sport and Exercise Psych. (1988) 10:32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:104–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1988) 22(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995a) 19:189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995b) 6(2):118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S. A., Bostrom R. P. Training end users: An experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quart. (1993) 17:61–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):318–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ellen P. S., Bearden W. O., Sharma S. Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1991) 19(4):297–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Bookstein F. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(3):472–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M., Mitchell T. R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(2):183–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gist M., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(6):884–891CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guthrie J. P., Schwoerer C. E. Individual and contextual influences on self-assessed training needs. J. Organ. Behavior (1994) 15:405–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henry J. W., Stone R. W. A structural equation model of end user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Inform. Resources Management J. (1994) 7(3):21–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill T., Smith N. D., Mann M. F., R. J. Lutz. Advances in Consumer Research (1986) (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT) 419–422Communicating innovations: convincing computer phobics to adopt innovative technologiesGoogle Scholar
  • Hill T., Smith N. D., Mann M. F. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 72(2):307–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega (1995) 23(6):587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones G. R. Socialization tactics self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:262–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohmoller J.Latent Variable Path Modelling with Partial Least Squares (1989) (Heidelberg Germany)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marakas G., Yi M., Johnson R. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):126–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J. Microcomputer usage as opportunity: The influence of context in employee training. Personnel Psych. (1992) 45:529–551CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J. Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety self-efficacy, and learning in training. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(6):819–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J., Webster J. Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psych. (1992) 45:553–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):173–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieu J. E., Martineau J. W., Tannenbaum S. I. Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: Implications for training effectiveness. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46:125–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scholtz J., Weidenbeck S. Learning second and subsequent programming languages: A problem of transfer. International J. Human-Comput. Interact. (1990) 2:51–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singley M. K., Anderson J. R. The transfer of text-editing skill. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1985) 22:403–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singley M. K., Anderson J. R. A keystroke analysis of learning and transfer in text editing. Human-Comput. Interact. (1988) 3:223–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995a) 6(2):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quart. (1995b) 19(4):561–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tornatzky L. G., Klein K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Engrng. Management (1982) EM-29:28–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27(3):451–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Martochhio J. J. Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):201–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whiteside J., Jones S., Levy P. S., Wixon D. User performance with command, menu, and iconic interfaces. CHI'85 Proc.: Human Factors in Comput. Systems (1985) (San Francisco, CA)185–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.