Effects of Information Revelation Policies Under Cost Uncertainty

References

• Adomavicius G., Gupta A., Sanyal P. Design and evaluation of feedback schemes for multi-attribute procurement auctions. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2008) Paris http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/32Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G., Gupta A., Zhdanov D. Designing intelligent software agents for auctions with limited information feedback. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(4):484–506Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Greenwald A., Kannan K. N., Krishnan R. Effects of information-revelation policies under market-structure uncertainty. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1234–1248Link, Google Scholar
• Aumann R. Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica (1987) 55(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P. Comparing competition and collusion in procurement auctions: A numerical approach. Econom. Theory (2001) 18:187–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J., Reiss J. P. Entry decisions and bidding behavior in sequentialfirst-price procurement auctions: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 58(1):50–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr S. Note on online auctions with costly bid evaluations. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1521–1528Link, Google Scholar
• Culligan K. SO2 allowance in the US. Proc. 2nd Global Carbon Market Forum: Auctioning Carbon Allowances—Towards Robust Auction Design and Implementation (2008) Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Daughety A., Reinganum J. Asymmetric information acquisition and behavior in role choice models: An endogenously generated signaling game. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1994) 35(4):795–819Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W., Keskinocak P. Technology for transportation bidding at the Home Depot. (2000) . http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/people/faculty/Pinar_Keskinocak/home-depot-case.zipGoogle Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Goes P., Karuga G., Tripathi A. Understanding willingness-to-pay formation of repeat bidders in sequential online auctions. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) . epub ahead of print May 12, 2009, http://isr.journal.informs.org/Google Scholar
• Granados N., Gupta A., Kauffman R. J., Tomak K. Transparency strategy in Internet-based selling. Advances in the Economics of Information Systems (2005) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) 80–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald A., Kannan K., Krishnan R. On evaluating information revelation policies in procurement auctions: A Markov decision process approach. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(1):15–36Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. (1967) 14(3):159–182Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Part II. Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Sci. (1968a) 14(5):320–334Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Part III. The basic probability distribution of the game. Management Sci. (1968b) 14(7):486–502Link, Google Scholar
• Hausch D. Multi-object auctions: Sequential vs. simultaneous sales. Management Sci. (1986) 32(12):1599–1610Link, Google Scholar
• Hausch D. A model of sequential auctions. Econom. Lett. (1988) 26(3):227–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(July):96–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P.Auctions: Theory and Practice (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppius O. R. Information architecture and electronic market performance. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandGoogle Scholar
• Kostamis D., Beil D., Duenyas I. Total-cost procurement auctions: Should the buyer reveal suppliers' quality? Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1985–1999Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna V.Auction Theory (2009) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Kumar S., Dawande M., Mookerjee V. S. Optimal scheduling and placement of Internet banner advertisements. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2007) 19(11):1571–1584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J. Game theory and empirical economics: The case of auction data. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1997) 41(1):1–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J., Martimort D. The theory of incentives. The Principal Agent Model (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Auction theory in private values. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(2):150–155Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000a) 67(3):413–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Equilibrium in sealed high bid auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000b) 67(3):439–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee P., McMillan J.Incentives in Government Procurements (1988) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Roberts J. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):443–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Jones J. Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):455–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(4):427–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• OMB CIRCULAR A-110: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations. (1993) . Revised on 11/19/93 and further amended on 9/30/99Google Scholar
• Ortega-Reichert A. Models for competitive bidding under uncertainty. (1968) . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Salanie J.The Economics of Contracts (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Spence M. Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87(3):355–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Market structure and the flow of information in repeated auctions. (1996) . Working paper, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Thomas C. Information revelation and buyer profits in repeated procurement competition. J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(1):79–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tu Z. Why do we use Dutch auction to sell flowers? Information disclosure in sequential auctions. (2005) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• United-Nations United Nations Procurement Manual. (2007) . Revision 6. http://www.un.org/Depts/ptd/manual.htmGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R. A bidding model of perfect competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44(3):511–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler R., Brooks D. Competitive bidding with dependent value estimates. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(3, Part I):603–613Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo B., Choudhary V., Mukhopadhyay T. Electronic B2B marketplaces with different ownership structures. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):952–961Link, Google Scholar