Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0295

References

  • Agarwal R., Venkatesh V. Assessing a firm's Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):168–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja M. K., Thatcher J. B. Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):427–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. (2000) 11(January):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arabie P., Hubert L., Bagozzi R. P. Cluster analysis in marketing research. Advanced Methods in Marketing Research (1994) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 160–189Google Scholar
  • Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., Vohs K. D. Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. (2001) 5(4):323–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A., Pinsonneault A. Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):493–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Barki H. Quo vadis, TAM? J. AIS (2007) 8(4):211–218Google Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Zmud R. W. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A., Hikmet N. Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(6):725–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A., Hikmet N. Enablers and inhibitors of healthcare information technology adoption: Toward a dual-factor model. AMCIS 2008 Proc. (2008) 135(August):1–8Google Scholar
  • Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 349–381Google Scholar
  • Bolger N., Davis A., Rafaeli E. Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Rev. Psych. (2003) 54:579–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. A., Fuller R. M., Vician C. Who's afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer-mediated communication. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(2):79–107Google Scholar
  • Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (1992) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks) Google Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A., Gallivan M. J. Towards a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):657–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll J., Howard S., Vetere F., Peck J., Murphy J. Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. 35th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2002) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.Piscataway, NJ:1–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cenfetelli R. T. Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(11–12):472–492Google Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K. Inhibitors to EDI adoption in small businesses: An empirical investigation. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2001) 2(2):78–88Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diener E., Smith H., Fujita F. The personality structure of affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 69(1):130–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Everard A., Galletta D. F. Effect of presentation flaws on perceived quality of on-line stores' web sites what makes all the difference: The actual presence of a flaw or the perception of a flaw? J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 22(3):56–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flanagan J. C. The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. (1954) 51:28–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flanders V. Web pages that suck. ((n.d.)) . Retrieved June 23, 2009, http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/worst-business-web-sites-of-2009-but-you-can-learn-something-from-them.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Galletta D. F., Henry R. M., McCoy S., Polak P. Web site delays: How tolerant are users? J. AIS (2004) 5(1):1–28Google Scholar
  • Gauggel S., Wietasch A., Bayer C., Rolko C. The impact of positive and negative feedback on reaction time in brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychology (2000) 14(1):125–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glick W. H. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):601–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grazioli S., Jarvenpaa S. L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. Systems, Man Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Trans. (2000) 30(4):395–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greitemeyer T., Kazemi E. Asymmetrical consequences of behavioral change through reward and punishment. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2008) 38(2):246–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gremler D. D. The critical incident technique in service research. J. Service Res. (2004) 7(1):65–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hayes A. F. A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Comm. Res. (2006) 32(4):385–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzberg F., Mausner G., Snyderman B. B.Work and the Nature of Man (1966) (World Publishing Company, Cleveland) Google Scholar
  • Hoyle R. H., Georgesen J. C., Webster J. M. Analyzing data from individuals in groups: The past, the present, and the future. Group Dynam: Theory, Res., Practice (2001) 5(1):41–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • iPerceptions Retail/e-commerce industry report Q2 2009. (2009) . Retrieved October 19, http://www.iperceptions.comGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston R. The determinants of service quality—Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. Internat. J. Services Indust. Management (1995) 6(5):53–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Julian M. W. The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modeling. Structural Equation Modeling (2001) 8(3):325–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Miller D. T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(2):136–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Krueger A. B., Schkade D. A., Schwarz N., Stone A. A. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science (2004) 306(5702):1776–1780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaiser H. F. A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika (1970) 35(4):401–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil M., Cule P. E., Lyytinen K., Schmidt R. C. A framework for identifying software project risks. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(11):76–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil M., Li L., Mathiassen L., Zheng G. Z. The influence of checklists and roles on software practitioner risk perception and decision-making. J. System Software (2008) 81(6):908–919CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King W. R., Teo T. S. H. Key dimensions of facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 12(4):35–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krull J. L., MacKinnon D. P. Multilevel modeling of individual and group-level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (2001) 36(2):249–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapointe L., Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):461–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenhart A., Horrigan J., Rainie L., Allen K., Boyce A., Madden M., O'Grady E. The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. (2003) . The Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki R. J., McCallister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):438–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyytinen K. Expectation failure concept and systems analysts view of information-system failures—Results of an exploratory study. Inform. Management (1988) 14(1):45–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieson K., Peacock E., Chin W. W. Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. Data Base Adv. Inform. Systems (2001) 32(3):86–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):334–359LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Kacmar C., Choudhury V. Whoops. 36th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2003) IEEE Computer SocietyWashington, DC:1–10Google Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Kacmar C., Choudhury V. Dispositional trust and distrust distinctions in predicting high- and low-risk Internet expert advice site perceptions. e-Service J. (2004) 3(2):35–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizerski R. W. An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(December):301–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R. IT project management: Infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quart. Executive (2007) 6(2):67–78Google Scholar
  • Nicolaou A. I., McKnight D. H. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):332–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J., Bernstein I.Psychometric Theory (1994) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) 1–736Google Scholar
  • Parthasarathy M., Bhattacherjee A. Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):362–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P. A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2003) 7(3):101–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P. A., Huigang L., Yajiong X. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):105–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in IS research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):1–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Addressing disturbing and disturbed consumer behavior: Is it necessary to change the way we conduct behavioral science? J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(1):1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose G., Straub D. W. The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward the e-service retailer. e-Service J. (2001) 1(1):55–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rozin P., Royzman E. B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2001) 5(4):296–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirdeshmukh D., Singh J., Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):15–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skowronski J. J., Carlston D. E. Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 52(4):689–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swan J. E., Combs L. J. Product performance and consumer satisfaction: A new concept. J. Marketing (1976) 40(1):25–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S. E. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(1):67–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teo T. S. H., Ranganathan C., Dhaliwal J. Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of Web-based business-to-business electronic commerce. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53(3):395–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thatcher J. B., Stepina L. P., Srite M., Liu Y. M. Culture, overload and personal innovativeness with information technology: Extending the nomological net. J. Comput. Inform. Systems (2003) 44(1):74–81Google Scholar
  • Thurstone L. L.Multiple-Factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of the Vectors of the Mind (1947) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Trochim W. M. K. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation Program Planning (1989) 12(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Brown S. A. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):71–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wailgum T. ERP implementation success: Odds are stacked against you. (2009) . Retrieved January 8, http://advice.cio.com/thomas_wailgum/erp_implementation_success_odds_are_stacked_against_youGoogle Scholar
  • Wixom B. H., Todd P. A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):85–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yzerbyt V. Y., Leyens J. P. Requesting information to form an impression: The influence of valence and confirmatory status. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1991) 27(4):337–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L., Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Marketing (1996) 60(2):31–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml V. A., Parasuraman A., Malhotra A. Service quality delivery through Web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):362–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang P., vonDran G. M. Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two-factor model for website design and evaluation. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (2000) 51(14):1253–1268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.