IT Outsourcing Contracts and Performance Measurement

References

• Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Writing the optimal outsourcing agreement. (2009) . Expertise in Action White Paper, accessed September 2009, www.acs-inc.comGoogle Scholar
• Allen D., Lueck D. Risk, uncertainty and contracts. (1995) . Manuscript, Yale Law School, Center of Law, Economics and Public Policy, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Alpar P., Saharia A. Outsourcing information systems functions: An organizational economics perspective. J. Organ. Comput. (1995) 5(3):197–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E., Schmittlein D. Integration of the sales force: An empirical examination. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15:385–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Beath C. Hierarchical elements in software contracts. J. Organ. Comput. (1993) 3(3):329–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Cummings L. Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):235–255Link, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Straub D. Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):535–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A., Duflo E. Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):989–1017Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickley J. A., Zimmerman J. Changing incentives in a multitask environment: Evidence from a top-tier business school. J. Corporate Finance (2001) 7(4):367–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway E. Xerox, EDS try to keep spark in outsource deal. PC Week (1996) September 9Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Bharadwaj A. An empirical analysis of contract structures in IT outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(4):484–506Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier J., Ellison G. Career concerns of mutual fund managers. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 114(2):389–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons E., Hitt L., Snir E. A risk analysis framework for IT outsourcing. (2000) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Cragg M. Performance incentives in the public sector: Evidence from the Job Training Partnership Act. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1997) 13(1):147–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dibbern J., Goles T., Hirscheim R., Jayatilaka B. Information systems outsourcing: A survey and analysis of the literature. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2004) 35(4):6–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiRomualdo A., Gurbaxani V. Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(4):67–80Google Scholar
• Economist External affairs. (2007) July 28):65–66Google Scholar
• Fast N., Berg N. The Lincoln Electric Company. (1975) . Harvard Business School Case #376–028, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Garen J. Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:1175–1199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner Dataquest Worldwide IT services market definitions guide, 2Q03. Gartner Dataquest Guide (2003) August(Stamford, CT)Google Scholar
• Gopal A., Sivaramakrishnan K., Krishnan M., Mukhopadhyay T. Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1671–1683Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman S., Hart O. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica (1983) 51:7–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V., Cheon M., Teng J. The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. J. MIS (1996) 12(4):89–116Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V., Apte U., Karmarkar U. Information systems outsourcing contracts: Theory and evidence. Managing in the Information Economy: Current Research (2007) (Springer, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O., Moore J. Foundations of incomplete contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(1):115–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1991) 7:24–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):972–991Google Scholar
• Kalnins A., Mayer K. Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology. J. Law Econom. Organ. (2004) 20(1):207–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kern T., Willcocks L.The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18(4):769–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein B., Crawford R., Alchian A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacity M., Hirscheim R.Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities (1993) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Lacity M., Willcocks L., Feeny D. IT outsourcing: Maximize flexibility and control. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(3):84–93Google Scholar
• Lafontaine F. Agency theory and franchising: Some empirical results. RAND J. Econom. (1992) 23:263–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. P. Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:1346–1361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marriott I., Da Rold C. The European outsourcing and IT services scenario: Insight for a turbulent market. (2009) Keynote presentationJune 15Gartner Outsourcing IT Services Summit, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Milgrom P. Employment contracts, influence activities and efficient organization design. J. Political Econom. (1988) 96(1):42–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murthy P. Personal interview (CEO). (2007) . iGate Corporation, Fremont, CAGoogle Scholar
• Nam K., Rajagopalan S., Rao H., Chaudhury A. A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(7):36–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P. Fiscal year ends and non-linear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113:149–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P., Shaefer S. Why do some firms give stock options to all employees? An empirical examination of alternative theories. J. Financial Econom. (2005) 76(1):99–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. The tenuous tradeoff between risk and incentives. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(4):1071–1102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao C. Uncertainty, entrepreneurship, and sharecropping in India. J. Political Econom. (1971) 79:578–595Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders C., Gebelt M., Hu Q. Achieving success in information systems outsourcing. California Management Rev. (1997) 39(2):63–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seiler E. Piece rate vs. time rate: The effects of incentives on earning. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1984) 66(3):363–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard A. Contractual form, retail price, and asset characteristics in gasoline retailing. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(1):58–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A., Subramanyam R., Karhade P. Contractual provisions to mitigate holdup: Evidence from information technology outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(1):37–55Link, Google Scholar
• Weakland T., Tumpowsky B. Global IT outsourcing study. (2006) . White paper, Diamond Management and Technology Consultants, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Wholey D., Padman R., Hamer R., Schwartz S. Determinants of information technology outsourcing. Health Care Management Sci. (2001) 4(3):229–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Young A. Outsourcing market view: What the future holds. (2007) Presentation, May, Gartner IT Services Sourcing SummitLas Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar