Research Commentary—Designing Smart Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0316

References

  • Adomavicius G., Gupta A. Toward comprehensive real-time bidder support in iterative combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(2):169–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G., Gupta A., Zhdanov D. Designing intelligent software agents for auctions with limited information feedback. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(4):507–526LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Replicating online yankee auctions to analyze auctioneers' and bidders' strategies. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):244–268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Jin Y. User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2004) 28(1):21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Karuga G. Predicting bidders' willingness to pay in online multi-unit ascending auctions: Analytical and empirical insights. INFORMS J. Comput. (2008) 20(3):345–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M., Kalagnanam J. Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 160(2):380–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M., Shabalin P., Pikovsky A. A computational analysis of linear-price iterative combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(1):33–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Gini M. Flexible decision control in an autonomous trading agent. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2009) 8(2):91–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Gini M. Flexible decision support in dynamic interorganizational networks. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2010) 19(4):436–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J., Ketter W., Sadeh N. Pushing the limits of rational agents: The trading agent competition for supply chain management. AI Magazine (2010) 31(2):63–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. Introduction to combinatorial auctions. Combinatorial Auctions (2006) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gallien J., Wein L. A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity contraints. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):76–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goossens D. R., Maas A. J. T., Spieksma F., van de Klundert J. J. Exact algorithms for procurement problems under a total quantity discount structure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 178(2):603–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A., Kannan K., Krishnan R. On evaluating information revelation policies in e-marketplaces: A Markov decision approach. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(1):15–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanusch H., Pyka A. Principles of neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge J. Econom. (2007) 31(2):275–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kambil A., van Heck E. Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Inform. System Res. (1998) 9(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kearns M., Ortiz L. The Penn-Lehman automated trading project. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2003) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 22–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Collins J., Block C. A. Smart grid economics: Policy guidance through competitive simulation. (2010) . Technical Report ERS-2010-043-LIS, RSM Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Collins J., Gini M., Gupta A., Schrater P. Detecting and forecasting economic regimes in multi-agent automated exchanges. Decision Support Systems (2009) 47(4):307–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ketter W., Kryzhnyaya E., Damer S., McMillen C., Agovic A., Collins J., Gini M. Analysis and design of supply-driven strategies in TAC-SCM. (2004) Trading Agent Design Anal. WorkshopColumbia University, New York:44–51Google Scholar
  • Maes P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Comm. ACM (1994) 37(7):31–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCabe K., Rassenti S., Smith V. Smart computer-assisted markets. Science (1991) 254(5031):534–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheffel T., Pikovsky A., Bichler M., Guler K. An experimental comparison of linear and nonlinear price combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) . ePub ahead of print February 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0267Google Scholar
  • Shiv B., Fedorikhin A. Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res.: An Interdisciplinary Quart. (1999) 26(3):278–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Rational decision making in business organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1979) 69(4):493–513Google Scholar
  • Vazirani V. V., Nisan N., Roughgarden T., Tardos E.Algorithmic Game Theory (2007) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wellman M. P., Greenwald A., Stone P.Autonomous Bidding Agents: Strategies and Lessons from the Trading Agent Competition (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents) (2007) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge M., Jennings N. R. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engrg. Rev. (1995) 10(2):115–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.