Research Commentary—Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems

References

• Allen P. M., Varga L. A co-evolutionary complex systems perspective on information systems. J. Inform. Tech. (2006) 21(4):229–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P. W. More is different—Broken symmetry and nature of hierarchical structure of science. Science (1972) 177(4047):393–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H., Pinsonneault A. A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):165–179Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beinhocker E. D. Robust adaptive strategies. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(3):95–106Google Scholar
• Benbya H., McKelvey B. Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve is alignment: A multi-level approach. J. Inform. Tech. (2006) 21(4):284–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Comparison of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1471–1492Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camillus J. C. Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2008) 86(5):98–106Google Scholar
• Campbell A., Goold M., Alexander M. Corporate-strategy: The quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(2):120–132Google Scholar
• Charette R. N. This car runs on code. (2009) . IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved September 5, 2010, http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/advanced-cars/this-car-runs-on-codeGoogle Scholar
• Christiaanse E., Venkatraman N. Beyond SABRE: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(1):15–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A., Gunther R.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A. The three faces of information systems identity: Connection, immersion, and fusion. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 12:588–598Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A., Pavlou P. A. IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quart. Executive (2008) 7(3):139–150Google Scholar
• Hedberg B., Jönsson S. Designing semi-confusing information-systems for changing organizations. SIGMIS Data Base (1982) 13(2–3):12–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson J. C., Venkatraman N. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems J. (1993) 32(1):4–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(2):386–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C., Venkatraman H. N., Tanriverdi H., Iyer B. Complementarity-based hypercompetition in the software industry: Theory and empirical test, 1990–2002. Strategic Management J. (2010) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–13Link, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Reflections on the systems integration enterprise. Bus. Process Management J. (2001) 7(3):1–9Google Scholar
• McDaniel R. R., Jordan M. E., Fleeman B. F. Surprise, surprise, surprise! A complexity science view of the unexpected. Health Care Management Rev. (2003) 28(3):266–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDaniel R. R., Lanham H. J., Anderson R. A. Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for the design of research on health care organizations. Health Care Management Rev. (2009) 34(2):191–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo S., Wade M. R. The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. (2010) 34(1):163–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page S. E.Understanding Complexity (2009) (The Teaching Company, Chantilly, VA) Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Popper K.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959) (Hutchinson & Co., London) Google Scholar
• Porter M., Siggelkow N. Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. (2008) 22(2):34–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is a strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
• Rai A., Tang X. Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Inform. Systems Res.21(3):516–542Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Sambamurthy V., Agarwal R. How CIOs can enable governance of value nets. MIS Quart. Executive (2008) 7(4):193–204Google Scholar
• Reiner J., Schaper M. Tackling IT complexity in product design. McKinsey Quart. (2010) March):1–9Google Scholar
• Ross J. W., Weill P., Robertson D.Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution (2006) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaper M. Tackling IT complexity in product design. McKinsey Quart. (2010) March):1–9Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(2):311–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H., Du K. Disintegrating information technology in corporate divestitures: Implications for regulatory compliance risks and costs. Proc. Thirtieth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2009) Association for Information Systems, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Tanriverdi H., Uysal V. B. Cross-business information technology integration and acquirer value creation in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) . ePub ahead of print January 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0250Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H., Konana P., Ge L. The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):280–299Link, Google Scholar
• Wiggins R. R., Ruefli T. W. Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):82–105Link, Google Scholar
• Wiggins R. R., Ruefli T. W. Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(10):887–911Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Sociol. (1981) 87(3):548–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright S. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics (1931) 16(2):97–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):549–566Link, Google Scholar