Research Commentary—Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0318

References

  • Arthur W. B.The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves (2009) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Beniger J. R.The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society (1986) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Saunders A.Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology Is Reshaping the Economy (2009) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciborra C. U.and AssociatesFrom Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 22Google Scholar
  • Clark D. D., Wroclawski J., Sollins K. R., Braden R. Tussle in cyberspace: Defining tomorrow's Internet. EEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2005) 13(2):462–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David P. A. The beginnings and prospective ending of “end-to-end”: An evolutionary perspective on the Internet's architecture. (2005) . Discussion Paper 0502012, EconWPA, Stanford, CA. http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpio/0502012.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards P. N., Jackson S. J., Bowker G. C., Knobel C. P. Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. (2007) . Report, History and Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructure workshop, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353Google Scholar
  • Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. (2010) 35(2):202–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J. D., Backoff R. W., Cameron R. E. Q. K. S. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 81–121Google Scholar
  • Hanseth O., Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. (2010) 25(1):1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzhoff J. The ICT convergence discourse in the information systems literature—A second-order observation. Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (2009) Verona, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Herzhoff J., Elaluf-Calderwood S., Sørensen C. Convergence, conflicts, and control points: A systems-theoretical analysis of mobile VoIP in the UK. Proc. Joint 9th Internat. Conf. Mobile Bus. 9th Global Mobility Roundtable (2010) Athens, GreeceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes T. P., Bijker W. E., Pinch H. T. P. T. The evolution of large technical systems. The Social Construction of Technological Systems (1987) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kallinikos J.The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change (2006) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J., Aaltonen A., Marton A. A theory of digital objects. First Monday (2010) 15(6–7Google Scholar
  • Lessig L.The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World (2001) 1st Vintage Books ed.(Random House, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lyytinen K., King J. L. Standard making: A critical research frontier for information systems research. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):405–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T., Yates K., Benjamin R. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Iacono C. S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):562–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sidorova A., Evangelopoulos N., Valacich J. S., Ramakrishnan T. Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(3):467–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen C., Galliers B., Currie W. Mobile IT. The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions (2011) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Ruhleder K. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):111–134LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tilson D. The interrelationships between technical standards and industry structures: Actor-network based case studies of the mobile wireless and television industries in the U.S. and the UK. (2008) . Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland. http://hdl.handle.net/2374.OX/17205Google Scholar
  • Tilson D., Lyytinen K., Sorensen C. Desperately seeking the infrastructure in IS reserach: Conceptualization of “digital convergence” as coevolution of social and technical infrastructures. Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci (2010) Koloa, Kauai, HIGoogle Scholar
  • Wikipedia Generativity. (2010) . Accessed June 5, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/generativityGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J.Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (1989) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Yoo Y. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. (2010) 34(2):213–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zittrain J.The Future of the Internet (2008) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.