Research Commentary—Vigilant Interaction in Knowledge Collaboration: Challenges of Online User Participation Under Ambivalence

References

• Aron R., Clemons E. K., Reddi S. Just right outsourcing: Understanding and managing risk. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(2):37–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S., Pavlou P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becerra-Fernandez I., Leidner D.Knowledge Management: An Evolutionary View: Advances in Management Inform. Systems (2008) (M. E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
• Bennett J. A tragery that won't fade away. (2009) . http://www.newsweek.com/2009/04/24/a-tragedy-that-won-t-fade-away.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V., Te'eni D. Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):456–475Link, Google Scholar
• Broom A. The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. J. Sociol. (2005) 41(1):87–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown H. G., Poole M. S., Rogers T. L. Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 20(4):115–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buller D. B., Burgoon J. K. Interpersonal deception theory. Comm. Theory (1996) 6(3):243–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S., Trope Y.Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (1999) (Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E., Resnick L. B., Lewine J., Teasley S. D. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1974) (The American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 127–149Google Scholar
• Clemons E. K., Hitt L. M. Poaching and the misappropriation of information: Transaction risks of information exchange. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(2):87–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Cook S. D. N., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N., Sproull L., Kiesler S. Beyond hearing: Where real world and online support meet. Group Dynam. (2002) 6(1):78–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Jarvenpaa S. L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Ferran C., Watts S. Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1565–1578Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzales-Bailon S., Kaltenbrunner A., Banchs R. E. The structure of political discussion networks: A model for the analysis of online deliberation. J. Inform. Tech. (2010) 25:230–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner M. E. Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisition of entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(3):435–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–386Link, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S. Where did they go wrong? An analysis of the failure of knowledgeable Internet consumers to detect deception over the Internet. Group Decision Negotiation (2004) 13(2):149–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazioli S., Jarvenpaa S. L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (2000) 30(4):393–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock J. T., Thom-Santelli J., Ritchie T. Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. Proc. SIGCHI Vienna (2004) Austira:129–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen R. D., Lowe C. A. Distinctiveness and consensus: Influence of behavioral information on actors and observers attributions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(3):425–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Grant D. Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):58–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. B., Bechky B. A. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):484–500Link, Google Scholar
• Herring S., Job-Sluber K., Scheckler R., Barab S. Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. Inform. Soc. (2002) 18(5):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P., Yoo Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):783–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knights D., Noble F., Vurdubakis T., Willmott H. Chasing shadows: Control, virtuality, and the production of trust. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22(2):311–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak S. Y. X., Benbasat I. A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. J. Ass. Inform. Systems (2008) 9(12):727–747Google Scholar
• Kotz P. Phoebe Prince, 15, commits suicide after onslaught of cyber-bullying from fellow students. (2010) . http://www.true-crimereport.com/2010/01/phoebe_prince_15_commits_suici.phpGoogle Scholar
• Krasnova H., Spiekermann S., Koroleva K., Hildebrand T. Online social networks: Why we disclose. J. Inform. Tech. (2010) 25(2):109–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langenderfer J., Shrimp T. A. Consumer vulnerability to scams, swindles, and fraud: A new theory on visceral influences on persuasion. Psych. Marketing (2001) 18(7):763–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):438–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., Tomlinson E. C., Gillespie N. Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. J. Management (2006) 32(6):991–1022Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C. C. Relationship between Machiavellianism and knowledge-sharing willingness. J. Bus. Psych. (2008) 22(3):233–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M., Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(1):42–67Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L. Information security in cross-enterprise collaborative knowledge work. Emergence (2005) 6(4):4–8Google Scholar
• Mancini P. Between trust and suspicion: How political journalists solve the problem. Eur. J. Comm. (1993) 8(1):33–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust building in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell K. J., Becker-Blease K. A., Finkelhor D. Inventory of problematic Internet experiences encountered in clinical practice. Professional Psych.: Res. Practice (2005) 36(5):498–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul D. L. Collabortive activities in virtual setting: A knowledge management perspective of t telemedicine. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 22(4):46–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Liang A., Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):105–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center 61% of American adults look online for health information. (2009) . http://www.pewinternet.org/press-releases/2009/the-social-life-of-health-information.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Prasarnphanich P., Wagner C. The role of wiki technology and altruism in collaborative knowledge creation. J. Comput. Inform. Systems (2009) 49(4):33–41Google Scholar
• Rains S. A. The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Comm. Res. (2007) 34(1):100–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice R. E. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: Multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Internat. J. Medical Informatics (2006) 75(1):8–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottman J. W., Lacity M. C. Proven practice effectively offshoring IT work. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(3):56–63Google Scholar
• Scott S. V., Walsham G. Reconceptualizing and managing reputation risk in the knowledge economy: Toward reputable action. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):308–322Link, Google Scholar
• Serva M. A., Fuller M. A., Mayer R. C. The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26(6):625–648Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A. Mobile access 2010. (2010) . http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/2010/mobile-access-2010.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Staples D. S., Webster J. Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Inform. Systems J. (2008) 18(6):617–640Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeney L. Designing a trustworthy nationwide health information network promises Americans privacy and utility, rather than falsely choosing between privacy or utility. (2010) Testimony to 21st Century Healthcare Caucus Roundtable, U.S. CongressApril 22, 2010Google Scholar
• Te'eni D. A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quart. Rev. (2001) 25(2):251–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijck J. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, Soc. (2009) 31(1):41–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the private collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Human Behav. (2007) 23(5):2538–2557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., van Der Heide B., Hamel L. M., Shulman H. C. Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using facebook. Comm. Res. (2009) 36(2):229–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M., Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M., Faraj S., Teigland R. Collective action and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(11–12):493–513Google Scholar
• Weber J. M., Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Res. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26:75–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright R. T., Marett K. The influence of experiential and dispositional factors in phishing: An empirical investigation of the deceived. J. Management Inform. Systems (2010) 27(1):273–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright R., Chakraborty S., Basoglu A., Marett K. Where did they go right? Understanding the deception in phishing communications. Group Decis. Negot. (2010) 19:391–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahedi F. M., Song J. Dynamics of trust revision: Using health infomediaries. J. Management Inform. Systems (2008) 24(4):225–248Crossref, Google Scholar