Research Commentary—Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango

References

• Ackoff R. L. Systems thinking and thinking systems. System Dynam. Rev. (1994) 10(2–3):175–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avison D., Jones J., Powell P., Wilson D. Using and validating the strategic alignment model. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2004) 13(3):223–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogner W. C., Barr P. S. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):212–226Link, Google Scholar
• Bohm D.Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980) (Routledge and K. Paul, London) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R., Grove A. Cross-boundary disruptors: Powerful interindustry entrepreneurial change agents. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. (2007) 1(3–4):315–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr N. G. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) May):41–49Google Scholar
• Chambers J. The HBR interview: Cisco sees the future. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2008) November):72–79Google Scholar
• Chi L., Holsapple C. W., Srinivasan C. Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems. Internat. J. Electron. Commerce (2007) 11(3):7–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchman C. W.The Design of Inquiring Systems (1971) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• DeSarbo W. S., Di Benedetto C. A., Song M., Sinha I. Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):47–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desouza K. C.Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(2):230–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A. The 3 faces of IS identity: Connection, immersion, and fusion. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 12:588–598Google Scholar
• Fiss P. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1180–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Henderson J. C., Venkatraman H. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems J. (1993) 32(1):4–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houghton B., El Sawy O. A., Gray P., Donegan C., Joshi A. Vigilant information systems for managing enterprises in dynamic supply chains: Real-time dashboards at Western Digital. MIS Quart. Executive (2004) 3(1):19–35Google Scholar
• Kaihla P. Inside Cisco's $2 billion blunder. Business 2.0. (2002) MarchGoogle Scholar
• Kogut B., Morgan G., Campbell J., Crouch C., Pedersen O. K., Whitley R. Qualitative comparative analysis of social science data. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis (2010) (Oxford University Express, Oxford, UK) 139–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi P. M., Barley S. R. Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inform. Organ. (2008) 18(3):159–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Markus L. M., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):583–598Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Gaba V., Colwell K. A. Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):456–473Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer A. D., Tsui A. S., Hinings C. R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1175–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles R., Snow C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Morgan G.Images of Organization (2006) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Oh W., Pinsonneault A. On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):239–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge J. Econom. (2010) 34(1):125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. From IT competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(3):443–471Link, Google Scholar
• Piccoli G., Ives B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):747–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin C. C.Fuzzy Set Social Science (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Ragin C. C.Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Set and Beyond (2008) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin C. C., Fiss P., Ragin C. C. Net effects versus configurations: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Set and Beyond (2008) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 190–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rihoux B., Ragin C. C.Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparitive Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (2009) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivard S., Raymond L., Verreault D. Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2006) 15:29–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A. S., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary organizations. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner C., Majchrzak A. Enabling customer-centricity using Wikis and the Wiki way. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(3):17–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiggins R. R., Ruefli T. W. Schumpeter's ghost: Is hyper competition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(10):887–911Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F., Griffith T. L., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D. J., Faraj S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):749–762Link, Google Scholar