The Digitization of Healthcare: Boundary Risks, Emotion, and Consumer Willingness to Disclose Personal Health Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0335

References

  • Ariely D., Loewenstein G. The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making (2006) 19(2):87–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Awad N. F., Krishnan M. S. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):13–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckerman J. Z., Pritts J., Goplerud E., Leifer J. C., Borzi P. A., Rosenbaum S., Anderson D. R. A delicate balance: Behavioral health, patient privacy, and the need to know. California Healthcare Foundation: Issue Brief (2008) . http://www.acmha.org/content/events/critical/goplerud_PI_Briefing_Paper_060208.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein W. S., Murchinson J. V., Dutton M. J., Keville T. D., Belfort R. D. Whose data is it anyway? Expanding consumer control over personal health information. California Healthcare Foundation: Issue Brief (2008) . http://www.oregon.gov/OHPPR/HIIAC/WebOnlyMaterials/WhoseDataIsItAnywayIB.pdf?ga=kGoogle Scholar
  • Bonner W., Chiasson M. If fair information principles are the answer, what was the question? An actor-network theory investigation of the modern constitution of privacy. Inform. Organ. (2005) 15(4):267–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman G., Watson R., Trotman-Beasty A. Primary emotions in patients with myocardial infarction. J. Advanced. Nursing (2006) 53(6):636–645CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brady M. K., Bourdeau B. L., Heskel J. The importance of brand cues in intangible service industries: An application to investment services. J. Services Marketing (2005) 19(6):401–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cline J. Why isn't Europe suffering a wave of security breaches? Computerworld (2006) . Accessed September 25, 2009. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9001176/Why_isn_t_Europe_suffering_a_wave_of_security_breachesGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen P. R.Experimental Methods for Artificial Intelligence (1995) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cosmides L., Tooby J., Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M. Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Handbook of Emotions (2000) 2nd ed.(Guilford Press, New York) 91–115Google Scholar
  • Coy K. L. The current privacy environment: Implications for third-party research. J. Continuing Ed. Health Professions (2001) 21(4):203–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):341–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M., Armstrong P. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):104–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M., Bies R. J. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues (2003) 59(2):323–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton S. O., Laursen T. M., Ross L., Mortensen P. B., Johansen C. Risk for hospitalization with depression after a cancer diagnosis: A nationwide, population-based study of cancer patients in Denmark from 1973 to 2003. J. Clinical Oncology (2009) 27(9):1440–1445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damasio A. R.Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (1994) (Putnam, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dimitropoulos L. Privacy and security solutions for interoperable health information exchange. (2007) . Accessed April 21, 2008. http://www.rti.org/page.cfm?objectid=09E8D494-C491-42FC-BA13EAD1217245C0Google Scholar
  • Dinev T., Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-Commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):61–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Druckman J. N., McDermott R. Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior (2008) 30(3):297–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field A.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows (2000) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Furnell S. M., Bryant P., Phippen A. D. Assessing the security perceptions of personal Internet users. Comput. Security (2007) 26(5):410–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D. Electronic commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega (2000) 28(5):1–19Google Scholar
  • Giordano L. A., Bickel W. K., Loewenstein G., Jacobs E. A., Badger G. J., Marsch L. A.Mild Opioid Deprivation and Delay to Consequences Affect How Opioid-Dependent Outpatients Value An Extra Maintenance Dose of Buprenorphine (2004) (Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Pittsburgh) Google Scholar
  • Glaser J., Henley D. E., Downing G., Brinner K. M.the Personalized Health Care Workgroup of the American Health Information Community Advancing personalized health care through health information technology: An update from the american health information community's personalized health care workgroup. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. (2008) 15(4):391–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Global Strategy Group West Virginia statewide survey. (2007) . http://www.healthyfuture.com/shared/content/News_objects/wv%20Statewide%20poll%208-08%20Topline.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Gostin L. O., Nass S. Reforming the HIPAA privacy rule: Safeguarding privacy and promoting research. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (2009) 301(13):1373–1375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grabe M., Westley B. H., Stempel G. H., Weaver D. H., Wilhoit G. C. The controlled experiment. Mass Communication Research and Theory (2003) (Allyn and Bacon, Boston) 267–298Google Scholar
  • Greenhouse S. W., Geisser S. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychometrika (1959) 24(2):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harless D. W., Camerer C. F. The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica (1994) 62(6):1251–1289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris P. Many U.S. adults are satisfied with use of their personal health information. (2007) March 26Accessed April 25, 2008, http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=743Google Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T., Peralta M. Building consumer trust online. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(4):80–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N., Vitale M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inform. Tech. Management (2000) 1(1/2):45–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen C., Potts C., Jensen C. Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior. Internat. J. Human-Computer Stud. (2005) 63(1/2):203–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jha A. K., DesRoches C. M., Campbell E. G., Donelan K., Rao S. R., Ferris T. G., Shields A., Rosenbaum S., Blumenthal D. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England J. Medicine (2009) 360(16):1628–1638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kam L. E., Chismar W. G. Online self-disclosure: Model for the use of Internet-based technologies in collecting sensitive health information. Internat. J. Healthcare Tech. Management (2006) 7(3/4):218–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim D., Labkoff S., Holliday S. H. Opportunities for electronic health record data to support business functions in the pharmaceutical industry.—A case study from Pfizer, Inc.. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. (2008) 15(5):581–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohlmeier G. Z. A. The risky business of lifestyle genetic testing: Protecting against harmful disclosure of genetic information. UCLA J. Law Tech. (2007) . Forthcoming. http://works.bepress.com/gabrielle_kohlmeier.1Google Scholar
  • Kühberger A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Perner J. The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 78(3):204–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kush E. D., Helton E., Rockhold F. W., Hardison C. D. Electronic health records, medical research and the tower of Babel. New England J. Medicine (2008) 358(16):1738–1741CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liedtke M. Google to test medical-record service. The Washingon Post (2008) February 21). Accessed April 14, 2008. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/21/AR2008022100004.html?hpid=sec-healthGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psych. (2005) 24(4):S49–S56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Weber E. U., Hsee C. K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. (2001) 127(2):267–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lunshof J. E., Chadwick R., Vorhaus D. B., Church G. M. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nature Rev. Genetics (2008) 9:406–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra N. K., Kim S. S., Agarwal J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):336–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mandel N. Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(1):30–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandle K. D., Kohane I. S. Tectonic shifts in the health information economy. New England J. Medicine (2008) 358(16):1732–1737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDermott R., Fowler J. H., Smirnov O. On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. J. Politics (2008) 70(2):335–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar V. C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-Commerce: An integrative topology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):334-359LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan S. E., Miller J. K. Communicating about the gift of life—Altruism and organ donation. J. Appl. Comm. Res. (2002) 30(2):163–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosquera M. Privacy experts face off over patient control, policy safeguards. Government Health IT (2009) . Accessed November 14, 2009. http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=72111Google Scholar
  • Mowry M., Constantinou D. Electronic health records: A magic pill? Appl. Clinical Trials (2007) . Accessed February 1, 2007. http://www.actmagazine.com/applied-clinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=401622Google Scholar
  • Nakashima E. Prescription data used to assess consumers. Washington Post (2008) August 4):A01Google Scholar
  • Noblin A. M. Privacy policy analysis for health information networks and regional health information organizations. Health Care Manager (2007) 26(4):331–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Guidance explaining significant aspects of the privacy rule—Personal representatives. (2003) . Accessed on May 4, 2008. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/guidelines/personalrepresentatives.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P. A., Geffen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pear R. Privacy issue complicates push to link medical data. New York Times (2009) January 18):A16Google Scholar
  • Peel D. C. Strengthen health information privacy. Healthcare Financial Management (2007) 61(11):32–36Google Scholar
  • Petronio S.Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure (2002) (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps J., Nowak G., Ferrell E. Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):27–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Leong-Yeon L., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter S. Consumers lack critical information about value of health IT. Report says privacy, security are top concerns. Amer. Acad. Family Physicians (2009) . Accessed January 18, 2010. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/practice-management/20091012consumers-health-tech.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Potter R. E., Balthazard P. The role of individual memory and attention processes during electronic brainstorming. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):621–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan R., Pham M. T. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79(1):56–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Loewenstein G. Enduring pain for money: Decisions based on the perception of memory of pain. J. Behav. Decision Making (1999) 12(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reese H. W. Counterbalancing and other uses of repeated-measures latin-square designs: Analyses and interpretations. J. Experiment. Child Psych. (1997) 64(1):137–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rettinger D. A., Hastie R. Content effects on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 85(2):336–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rick S. I., Cryder C. E., Loewenstein G. Tightwads and spendthrifts. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 34(6):767–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogelberg S. G., Stanton J. M. Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ. Res. Methods (2007) 10(2):195–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rohm A. J., Milne G. R. Just what the doctor ordered: The role of information sensitivity and trust in reducing medical information privacy concern. J. Bus. Res. (2002) 57(9):1000–1011CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1984) (McGraw-Hill, Boston) 141–148Google Scholar
  • Simon S. R., Evans J. S., Benjamin A., Delano D., Bates D. W. Patients' attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: Qualitative study. J. Medical Internet Res. (2009) 11(3). http://www.jmir.org/2009/3/e30/CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solove D. J.Understanding Privacy (2008) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Son J., Kim S. S. Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(3):503–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton J. M., Clarke S., Coakes E., Hunter M. G., Wenn A. Information technology and privacy: A boundary management perspective. Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems (2003) (Information Science Publishing, London) 79–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone E. G., Gueutal H. G., Gardner D. G., McClure S. A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. J. Appl. Psych. (1983) 68(3):459–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trumbo C. W., McComas K. A., Kannaovakun P. Cancer anxiety and perception of risk in alarmed communities. Risk Anal. (2007) 27(2):337–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Choice, values and frames. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(4):341–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) HHS awards contracts to advance nationwide interoperable health information technology. (2005) . Accessed April 21, 2008. http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2005pres/20051006a.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Personalized healthcare: Opportunities, pathways and resources. (2007) . Accessed May 4, 2008. http://www.hhs.gov/myhealthcare/news/presonalized-healthcare-9-2007.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Van Boven L., Loewenstein G. Social projection of transient visceral feelings. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2003) 29(9):1159–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Boven L., Loewenstein G., Welch N., Dunning D.The Illusion of Courage: Underestimating the Impact of Fear of Embarrassment on the Self (2004) (Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Pittsburgh) Google Scholar
  • Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wang X. T. Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68(2):145–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward S., Bridges K., Chitty B. Do incentives matter? An examination of online privacy concerns and willingness to provide personal and financial information. J. Marketing Comm. (2005) 11(1):21–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb T. L., Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psych. Bull. (2006) 132(2):249–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein N. D. Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psych. Bull. (1989) 105(1):31–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willison D. J., Schwartz L., Abelson J., Charles C., Swinton M., Northrup D., Thabane L. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: What is the opinion of the Canadian public? J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. (2007) 14(6):527–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willison D. J., Steeves V., Charles C., Schwartz L., Ranford J., Agarwal G., Cheng J., Thabane L. Consent for use of personal information for health research: Do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions. BMC Medical Ethics (2009) 10(10). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/10/10Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.