Research Note—A Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Group Appropriation on Collaborative Technologies Use and Performance

References

• Adams D. A., Nelson R. R., Todd P. A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):227–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ang S., Slaughter S., Ng K. Y. Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1427–1445Link, Google Scholar
• Baron R. S., Roper G. Reaffirmation of social comparison views of choice shift: Averaging and extremity effects in an autokinetic situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 33(5):521–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Lim L. H. The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(4):430–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(3):351–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, nonindependence and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
• Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W.Hierarchical Linear Models (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A., Straub D. W. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):228–246Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A., Gallivan M. J. Towards a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):657–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Gopal A., Salisbury W. D. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):342–367Link, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Cooper R. B., Zmud R. W. Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):123–139Link, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixom B. H., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):167–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Ellis S. J., Gibbs G. L., Rein C. A. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(1):38–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.Social Theory and Modern Sociology (1987) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Gopal A., Bostrom R. P., Chin W. W. Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(3):45–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hiltz S., Johnson K. User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems. Management Sci. (1990) 36:739–764Link, Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A., Morgeson F. P., Gerras S. J. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content-specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(1):170–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh J. J. P., Rai A., Keil M. Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):97–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating withingroup interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E., Agarwal R., Angst C. Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(4):781–804Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S. S., Malhotra N. K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying post-adoption phenomena. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):741–755Link, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3(3):211–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreft I., de Leeuw J.Introducing Multilevel Modeling (1998) (Sage Publishing, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):143–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y., Kozar K. A., Larsen K. R. T. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 12:752–780Google Scholar
• Limayem M., Banerjee P., Ma L. Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box. Decision Support Systems (2006) 42(2):945–957Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luke D. A.Multilevel Modeling Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (2004) (Sage Publishing, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Comm. Res. (1987) 14(5):491–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Silver M. S. A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2008) 9(10/11):609–632Google Scholar
• McFarland D. B., Sweeney P. D. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(3):626–637Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Ramasubbu N., Krishnan M. S., Fornell C. Designing websites for customer loyalty across business domains: A multilevel analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(3):97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salisbury D., Chin W., Gopal A., Newsted R. Research report: Better theory through measurement—Developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):91–102Link, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V. Supporting group performance during stakeholder analysis: The effects of alternative decision-based designs. (1989) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Sanders G. S., Baron R. S. Is social comparison irrelevant for reducing choice shifts? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1977) 13:303–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Valacich J. S., Sarker S. Technology adoption by groups: A valence perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2005) 6(2):37–71Google Scholar
• Sia C. L., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K. Can a GSS stimulate group polarization? An empirical study. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (1999) 29(2):227–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia C. L., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K. K. Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):70–90Link, Google Scholar
• Singer J. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. (1998) 23(4):323–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1328–1342Link, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Burton-Jones A. Veni, vidi, vici: Breaking the TAM logjam. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 8(4):223–229Google Scholar
• Sundaram S., Schwarz A., Jones E., Chin W. W. Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2007) 35:101–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27(3):451–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim M. B., Bélanger F. Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):267–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C., Valacich J. S. Facilitation, collaborative technologies, and training as sources of process restrictiveness and guidance for structured group decision making: An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):429–450Link, Google Scholar
• Yang H.-D., Yoo Y. It's all about attitude: Revisiting technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems (2004) 38(1):19–31Crossref, Google Scholar