Relative Industry Concentration and Customer-Driven IT Spillovers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0345

References

  • Alexander D. L., Thistle P. D. Market power, efficiency and the dispersion of systematic risk. Rev. Indust. Organ. (1999) 14(4):377–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ali A., Klasa S., Yeung E. The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with Compustat data: Implications for finance research. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22(10):3839–3871CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y., Brynjolfsson E. Information technology, incentives, and the optimal number of suppliers. J. MIS (1993) 10(2):37–53Google Scholar
  • Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X.Economic Growth (2004) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-based business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum C. F., Schaffer M. E., Stillman S. Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. (2003) . Boston College working papers in Economics, RePEC:boc:bocoec:545. Boston College, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Berger A. N. The profit-structure relationship in banking—Tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. J. Money, Credit Banking (1995) 27(2):404–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj S., Bharadwaj A., Bendoly E. The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(4):437–453LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R. W., Bond S. R. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics (1998) 87(1):115–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (1982) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):629–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron D., Glick M. Market share and market power in merger and monopolization cases. Managerial and Decision Econom. (1996) 17(2):193–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng Z., Nault B. R. Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. (2007a) 53(8):1199–1216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng Z., Nault B. R. Customer-driven IT spillovers and industry competition. Proc. Fall 2007 INFORMS Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. (2007b) SeattleGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Row M. C. Limits to interform coordination through information technology: Results of a field study in consumer packaged goods distribution. J. MIS (1993) 10(1):73–95Google Scholar
  • Danese P. Collaboration forms, information and communications technologies, and coordination mechanisms in CPFR. Internat. J. Production Res. (2006) 44(16):3207–3226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Survey (2003) 35(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Tambe P. Measuring spillovers from information technology investments. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2006) Milwaukee:1793–1802Google Scholar
  • Kachadourian G. A new ANX for everyone. Automotive Indust. (2000) 180(2):113Google Scholar
  • Kim E. H., Singal V. Mergers and market power: Evidence from the airline industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(3):549–569Google Scholar
  • Kundisch D., Mittal N., Nault B. R. Measuring IT productivity using income accounting. (2010) . Working paper, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  • Laudon K. C., Laudon J. P.Essentials of Management Information Systems (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lee H. L., So K., Tang C. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis I. Logistics and electronic commerce: An interorganizational systems perspective. Transportation J. (2001) 40(4):5–13Google Scholar
  • Mun S., Nadiri M. I. Information technology externalities: Empirical evidence from 42 U.S. industries. (2002) . National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9272, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B. R. Quality differentiation and adoption costs: The case for interorganizational information systems pricing. Ann. Oper. Res. (1997) 71:115–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B. R., Dexter A. S. Added value and pricing with information technology. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):449–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosencrance L. Speed racers. Computerworld (2002) 36(33):12Google Scholar
  • Sahaym A., Steensma H. K., Schilling M. A. The influence of information technology on the use of loosely coupled organization forms: An industry-level analysis. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):865–880LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stiroh K. J. Information technology and the U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1559–1576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stiroh K. J. Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: A meta-analysis and sensitivity tests. Contributions in Memory of Zvi Griliches (2010) (National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tambe P., Hitt L. M. Job hopping, knowledge spillovers, and regional returns to information technology investments. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2010 Proc. (2009) St. Louis:123Google Scholar
  • Vossen R. W. Market power, industrial concentration and innovative activity. Rev. Indust. Organ. (1999) 15(4):367–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang E. T. G., Seidmann A. Electronic data interchange: Competitive externalities and strategic implementation policies. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):401–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2003) 2nd ed.(South-Western, Mason, OH) Google Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu S. Migration to open standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(4):515–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.