Reputation and Uncertainty in Online Markets: An Experimental Study

References

• Akerlof G. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system. Decision Support Systems (2001) 31(3):323–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S., Pavlou P. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(5):961–981Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D. Putting a premium on regret. Management Sci. (1985) 31(1):117–122Link, Google Scholar
• Bendor J., Kramer R. M., Stout S. When in doubt…cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma. J. Conflict Resolution (1991) 35(4):691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10(1):122–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G., Katok E., Ockenfels A. How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1587–1602Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton G., Katok E., Ockenfels A. Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. J. Public Econom. (2005) 89(8):1457–1468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Weigelt K. Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica (1988) 56(1):1–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casari M., Ham J. C., Kagel J. H. Selection bias, demographic effects, and ability effects in common value auction experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1278–1304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cripps M., Dekel E., Pesendorfer W. Reputation with equal discounting in repeated games with strictly conflicting interests. J. Econom. Theory (2005) 121(2):259–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cripps M., Mailath G., Samuelson L. Imperfect monitoring and impermanent reputations. Econometrica (2004) 72(2):407–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation mechanisms. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407–1424Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(2):209–230Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Hsu V. Adverse selection in electronic markets: Evidence from online stamp auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2004) 52(4):497–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Gächter S., Kirchsteiger G. Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence. Econometrica (1997) 65(4):833–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Maskin E. Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(2):274–279Google Scholar
• Grief A. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(3):525–548Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D., Teoh S. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. (2003) 36(1–3):337–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E., McCabe K., Smith V. Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Econom. Inquiry (1998) 36(3):335–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung Y., Kagel J., Levin D. On the existence of predatory pricing: An experimental study of reputation and entry deterrence in the chain store game. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(1):72–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R., Wood C. The effects of shilling on final bid prices in online auctions. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2005) 4(1):21–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• King R. Reputation formation of reliable reporting: An experimental investigation. Accounting Rev. (1996) 71(3):375–396Google Scholar
• Kreps D., Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):253–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D., Milgrom P., Roberts J., Wilson R. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):245–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. (1982) 92(368):805–824Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned, and how? J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(3):227–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marschak T., Selten R. Restabilizing responses, inertia supergames and oligopolistic equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. (1978) 92(1):71–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnik M., Alm J. Does a seller's ecommerce reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(3):337–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):280–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce (2002) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 127–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Kuwabara K., Zeckhauser R., Friedman E. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Swanson J., Lockwood K. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(2):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sainty B. Achieving greater cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma: An experimental investigation. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1999) 39(4):421–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S. T., Young R. A., Zvinakis K. Reputation without repeated interaction: A role for public disclosures. Rev. Accounting Stud. (2000) 5(4):351–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R. A reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Internat. J. Game Theory (1975) 4(1):25–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C. Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. (1983) 98(4):659–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf J., Arkes H., Muhanna W. The power of touch: An examination of the effect of duration of physical contact on the valuation of objects. Judgment Decision Making (2008) 3(6):253–279Google Scholar