Managing Data Quality Risk in Accounting Information Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0371

References

  • Altman E.Constrained Decision Processes (1999) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, London) Google Scholar
  • Bagchi S., Bai X., Kalagnanam J. Data quality management using business process modeling. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Services Comput. (SCC'06) (2006) Chicago:398–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai X., Krishnan R., Padman R. Design of risk management strategies in business process information flow. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2007) (2007) Montréal, QuébecPaper 28, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2007/28Google Scholar
  • Ballou D. P., Pazer H. L. Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Management Sci. (1985) 31(2):150–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ballou D. P., Wang R. Y., Pazer H. L., Taylor L. K. Modeling data manufacturing systems to determine data product quality. (1993) . Technical Report 9, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Bootman J. L., Cronenwett L. R., Bates D. W., Califf R. M. Comprehensive strategies for reducing drug-related mistakes. (2007) . Report, Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • COSO Enterprise risk management—Integrated framework: Executive summary. (2004) . Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), American Institute of CPAs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Cushing B. E. A mathematical approach to the analysis and design of internal control systems. Accounting Rev. (1974) 49(1):24–41Google Scholar
  • Moore S. “Dirty data” is a business problem, not an IT problem. (2007) . Gartner, Inc., Stamford, CT. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=501733Google Scholar
  • Hall J. A.Accounting Information Systems (1998) 2nd ed.(South Western College Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Ham J., Losell D., Smieliauskas W. An empirical study of error characteristics in accounting populations. Accounting Rev. (1985) 60(3):387–406Google Scholar
  • Hoitash R., Hoitash U., Bedard J. C. Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (2008) 27(1):105–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang K. T., Lee Y. W., Wang R. Y.Quality Information and Knowledge (1999) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • ISACA Control objectives for information and related technology (COBIT). (2007) . ISACA and IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Ji Y., Mookerjee V. S., Sethi S. P. Optimal software development: A control theoretic approach. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(3):292–306LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knechel W. R. An analysis of alternative error assumptions in modeling the reliability of accounting systems. J. Accounting Res. (1985) 23(1):194–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn L. T., Corrigan J. M., Donaldson M. S. To err is human: Building a safer health system. (2000) . Report, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan J., Rama D., Zhang Y. Costs to comply with SOX Section 404. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (2008) 27(1):169–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan R., Peters J., Padman R., Kaplan D. On data reliability assessment in accounting information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(3):307–326LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lea R. B., Adams S. J., Boykin R. F. Modeling of the audit risk assessment process at the assertion level within an account balance. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (1992) 11(Supplement):152–179Google Scholar
  • Marinos G. Data quality: A risk-based approach. (2004) . Technical report, PricewaterhouseCoopers, San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Nado R., Chams M., Delisio J., Hamscher W. COMET: An application of model-based reasoning to accounting systems. Proc. 8th Innovative Appl. Artificial Intelligence Conf. (1996) (AAAI Press)1482–1490Google Scholar
  • Pipino L. L., Lee Y. W., Wang R. Y. Data quality assessment. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(4):211–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pittetl D., Donaldson L. Challenging the world: Patient safety and health care-associated infection. Internat. J. Quality Health Care (2006) 18(1):4–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richter A. The high cost of clean data. CFO Magazine for Senior Financial Executives (2007) (CFO Publishing LLC). accessed September 20, 2007, http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/9705501?f=searchGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel J. G., Shim J. K.Accounting Handbook (1998) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Strong D. M., Yang W. L., Wang R. Y. Data quality in context. Commun. ACM (1997) 40(5):103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun S. X., Zhao J. L., Nunamaker J. F., Sheng O. R. L. Formulating the data-flow perspective for business process management. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):374–391LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wand Y., Wang R. Y. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(11):86–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R. Y. A product perspective on total data quality management. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(2):58–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R. Y. Y., Strong D. M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 12(4):5–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.