The Cross-Purposes of Cross-Posting: Boundary Reshaping Behavior in Online Discussion Communities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0378

References

  • Arguello J., Butler B. S., Joyce L., Kraut R., Ling K. S., Rosé C. P., Wang X. Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. CHI 2006: Proc. ACM Conf. Human-Factors Comput. Systems (2006) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel C. A. Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members' organizational identity and identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):379–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowker G. C., Star S. L.Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Box G. E. P., Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (1964) 26(2):211–252Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: The internal dynamics of networked social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B., Sproull L., Kiesler S., Kraut R. E., Weisband S., Atwater L. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? Leadership at a Distance (2007) (Lawrence Erlbuam, Mahwah, NJ) 171–194Google Scholar
  • Cummings J. N., Butler B. S., Kraut R. E. The quality of online social relationships. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(7):103–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dabbish L., Kraut R. Awareness displays and social motivation for coordinating communication. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(2):221–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes R. M., Messick D. M. Social dilemmas. Internat. J. Psych. (2000) 35(2):111–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dourish P. Re-space-ing place: “Place” and “space” ten years on. Proc. 20th Anniversary Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2006) (ACM, New York) 299–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FAQ.org. USENET/cancel FAQ. 2007. (2007) . Accessed January 15, 2011, http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/cancel-faq/part1/Google Scholar
  • Feller J., Finnegan P., Fitzgerald B., Hayes J. From peer production to productization: A study of socially enabled business exchanges in open source service networks. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(4):475–493LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher D., Smith M., Welser H. T. You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in usenet newsgroups. Proc. 39th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2006) 3(IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 59bCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J., Flanagin A. J., Kalman M., Monge P. R., Ryan T. Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Comm. Theory (1996) 6(1):60–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hauben M., Hauben R.Netizens: On the History and Impact of USENET and the Internet (1997) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hill K., Hughes J.Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet (1998) (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MD) Google Scholar
  • Horrigan J.Online CommunitiesPew Internet & American Life Project, Accessed on January 10, 2011, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2001/Online-Communities.aspxGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q., Rafaeli S., Ravid G. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kang N., Choi J. H. Structural implications of the crossposting network of international news in cyberspace. Comm. Res. (1999) 26(4):454–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim A. J.Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities (2000) (Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Lakhani K., von Hippel E. How open source software works: Free user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K. R., Kanji Z.Threadless: The Business of Community (2008) . Harvard Business School Publishing Case 608707, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Lamont M., Molnar V. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (2002) 28:167–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampe C., Resnick P. Slash(dot) and burn: Distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. Proc. SIGCHI 2004 Conf. Human Factors in Comput. Systems (2004) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York) 543–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. No artificial death, only natural death: The dynamics of centralization and decentralization of usenet newsgroups. Inform. Soc. (2002) 18(5):361–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LePine J. A., Erez A., Johnson D. E. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(1):52–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma M., Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(1):42–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A. Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(3):21–28Google Scholar
  • Mehler A., Lüdeling A., Kytö M. Large text networks as an object of corpus linguistic studies. In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook (2007) (de Gruyter, Berlin/New York) Google Scholar
  • Moon J. Y., Sproull L. S. The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer workforce. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(4):494–515LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Berkowitz L. Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group interactions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1982) 15(Academic Press, New York) 137–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. Breaching or building social boundaries? Side-effects of computer-mediated communication. Comm. Res. (1998) 25(6):689–715CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powazek D. M.Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Real People in Virtual Places (2002) (Waite Group Press, Corte Madera, CA) Google Scholar
  • Preece J. Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behav. Inform. Tech. (2001) 20(5):347–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridings C., Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. (2004) 10(1). Article 4. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/ridings_gefen.htmlCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J., Hann I.-H., Slaughter S. Understanding the motivations, participation and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts T. L. Are newsgroups virtual communities? Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (1998) (ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York) 360–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santos F. M., Eisenhardt K. M. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):491–508LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Shaw B., McTavish F., Hawkins R., Gustafson D., Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the chess computer network. J. Health Comm. (2000) 5(2):135–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M., Fisher D. Measures and maps of USENET. From USENET to CoWebs: Interacting in Social Information Spaces (2003) (Springer, London) 47–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Templeton B. Origin of the term “spam” to mean Net abuse. (2007) . Accessed May 25, 2010, http://www.templetons.com/brad/spamterm.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson M. Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Org. Sci. (2005) 16(2):151–164LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittaker S., Terveen L., Hill W., Cherny L., Lueg C., Fisher D. The dynamics of mass interaction. From USENET to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces (2003) (Springer, London) 79–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.