The Impact of IT-Related Spillovers on Long-Run Productivity: An Empirical Analysis

References

• Anderson S., Banker R., Ravindran S. The new productivity paradox. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(3):91–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Cummings L. Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):235–256Link, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Straub D. Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):535–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M. Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1987) 49(4):431–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balmaseda M., Dolado J., Lopez-Salido D. The dynamic effects of shocks to labor markets: Evidence from OECD countries. Oxford Econom. Papers (2000) 52(1):3–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi B.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (1995) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Baltagi B., Blien B. The German wage curve: Evidence from IAB employment sample. Econom. Lett. (1998) 61(2):135–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. Panel data unit roots and cointegration: An overview. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1999) 61(S1):607–630Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X.Economic Growth (1995) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Basu S., Fernald J., Oulton N., Gertler M., Rogoff K.NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003 (2004) 18(Cambridge, MA)9–82Google Scholar
• Baum C., Schaffer M., Stillman S. Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J. (2003) 3(1):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becchetti L., Adriani F. Does the digital divide matter? The role of information and communication technology in cross-country level and growth estimates. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2005) 14(6):435–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergheim S.Long-Run Growth Forecasting (2008) (Springer, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein J., Nadiri M. Interindustry R&D spillovers, rate of return, and production in high-tech industries. AEA Papers Proc. (1988) 78(2):429–434Google Scholar
• Bernstein J., Nadiri M. Research and development and intraindustry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1989) 56(2):249–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J., Hunt R. An empirical look at software patents. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2007) 16(1):157–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) (AIS, Atlanta) Google Scholar
• Blanchard O., Quah D. The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(4):655–673Google Scholar
• Boynton A., Zmud R., Jacobs G. The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(3):299–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breitung J. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Rev. (2005) 24(2):151–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T. Measuring the spillovers from technical advances: Mainframe computers in financial services. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(4):741–755Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth. J. Econometrics (1995) 65(1):83–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3(4):183–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):23–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2003) 85(4):793–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A., Zhu F., Sorell M. Scale without mass: Business process replication and industry dynamics. (2007) . Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=980568Google Scholar
• Campbell J., Lapham B. Real exchange rate fluctuations and the dynamics of retail trade industries on the U.S.-Canada border. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(4):1194–1206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caselli F., Coleman W. Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers. AEA Papers Proc. (2001) 91(2):328–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng J., Nault B. Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1199–1216Link, Google Scholar
• Coe D., Helpman E. International R&D spillovers. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1995) 39(5):859–887Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly M. The dual nature of trade: Measuring its impact on imitation and growth. J. Development Econom. (2003) 39(5):859–887Google Scholar
• Cornwell C., Trumbull W. Estimating the economic model of crime with panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1994) 76(2):360–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Kraemer K. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Min C. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Shi C., Gurbaxani V. Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1829–1842Link, Google Scholar
• DiRomualdo A., Gurbaxani V. Strategic intent of IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(4):67–80Google Scholar
• Dolado J., Jimeno J. The causes of Spanish unemployment: A structural VAR approach. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1997) 41(7):1281–1307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolado J., Jenkinson T., Sosvilla-Rivero S. Cointegration and unit roots. J. Econom. Surveys (1990) 4(3):249–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle R., Granger C. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):251–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faust J., Leeper E. When do long-run identifying restrictions give reliable results? J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1997) 15(3):345–353Google Scholar
• Gali J. Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):259–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist S., Gurbaxani V., Town R. Productivity and PC revolution. (2001) . Working paper, Center for Research for Information Technology and Organization, University of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar
• Gong G., Keller W. Convergence and polarization in global income levels: A review of recent result on the role of international technology diffusion. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):1055–1079Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon R.The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):92–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z.R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinanvian J. Econom. (1992) 94:S29–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z.R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (1998) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V., Karmarkar U., Apte U. Information systems outsourcing contracts: Theory and evidence. Managing in the Information Economy: Current Research (2007) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J.Time Series Analysis (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris R., Tzavalis E. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. J. Econometrics (1999) 91(2):201–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holman C., Joyeux B., Kask C. Labor productivity trends since 2000, by sector and industry. Monthly Labor Rev. (2008) Feb. 1Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica (1988) 56(6):1371–1395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husted S., MacDonald R. Monetary-based models of the exchange rate: A panel perspective. J. Internat. Financial Markets, Inst. Money (1998) 8(1):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im K., Pesaran M., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econometrics (2003) 115(1):53–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs B., Nahuis R., Tang P. Sectoral productivity growth and R&D spillovers in The Netherlands. De Economist (2002) 152(2):181–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):984–1001Google Scholar
• Kakabadse A., Kakabadse N. Trends in outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe. Eur. Management J. (2002) 20(2):189–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller W. Trade and transmission of technology. J. Econom. Growth (2002) 7(1):5–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R., Chinta R. International technology transfer: Strategies for success. Acad. Management Executive (1990) 4(2):33–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein L., Saltzman C., Duggal V. Information technology and productivity: The case of financial sector. Survey Current Bus. (2003) 83(8):32–37Google Scholar
• Ko D., Kirsch L., King W. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):59–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Inform. Management (2001) 38(5):323–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J., Huynh M., Kwok R., Pi S. IT outsourcing evolution—Past, present, and future. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(5):84–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N., Ross J. From the vendor's perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):331–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin L., Geng X., Whinston A. A sender-receiver framework for knowledge transfer. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(2):197–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala G.Introduction to Econometrics (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Maddala G., Kim I.Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala G., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1999) 61(S1):631–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miozzo M., Grimshaw D. Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK. Res. Policy (2005) 34(9):1419–1439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monjon S., Waelbroeck P. Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: Evidence from French firm-level data. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21(9):1225–1270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mun S., Nadiri E. Information technology externalities: Empirical evidence from 42 U.S. industries. (2002) . NBER working paper 9272, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Nadiri E. Innovations and technological spillovers. (1993) . NBER Working Paper 4423, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Nakamura A., Nakamura M. Firm performance, knowledge transfer and international joint ventures. Internat. J. Tech. Management (2004) 27(8):731–746Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson C., Plosser C. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Some evidence and implications. J. Monetary Econom. (1982) 10(2):39–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD The economic impact of ICT: Measurement, evidence and implications. (2004) (OECD Publications, Paris, France) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ong S., Maxam C. A heterogeneous panel cointegration-error coorection approach to modelling commerical mortgage-backed security prices. J. Property Finance (1997) 8(4):317–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K. How dynamic consumer response, competitor response, company support, and company inertia shape long-term marketing effectiveness. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):596–610Link, Google Scholar
• Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1999) 61(S1):653–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesaran H. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econometrics (2007) 22(2):265–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesaran H., Shin Y., Smith R. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 94(446):621–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pilat D., Lee F., Ark B. Production and use of ICT: A sectoral perspective on productivity growth in the OECD area. OECD Econom. Stud. (2002) 35(2002/2Google Scholar
• Pohjola M., Jones D. C. The adoption and diffusion of ICT across countries: Patterns and determinants. The New Economy Handbooks (2003) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Poppo L., Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):707–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn J. Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(4):9–21Google Scholar
• Raut L. R&D spillover and productivity growth; Evidence from Indian private firms. J. Development Econom. (1995) 48(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer P. Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(5):1002–1037Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer P. The origins of endogenous growth. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(1):3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer F. Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1982) 64(4):627–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw G. Policy implications of endogenous growth theory. Econom. J. (1992) 102(412):611–621Google Scholar
• Siegel D. The impact of computers on manufacturing productivity growth: A multiple-indicators, multiple-causes approach. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1997) 79(1):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solow R. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart. J. Econom. (1956) 70(1):64–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spender J. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter special issue):45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K. Computers, productivity and input substitution. Econom. Inquiry (1998) 36(2):175–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K. Information technology and U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1559–1576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K. Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: A meta analysis. (2004) . Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Van Ark B., O'Mahony M., Timmer M. The productivity gap between Europe and the United States: Trend and causes. J. Econom. Perspect. (2008) 22(1):25–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Pottelsberghe B., Lichtenberg F. Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? Rev. Econom. Statist. (2001) 83(3):490–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veerbek B.A Guide to Modern Econometrics (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
• Wieser R. Research and development productivity and spillovers: Empirical evidence at the firm level. J. Econom. Surveys (2005) 19(4):587–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodbridge J.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar