Help
Cart
Skip main navigation

Available Issues

April 10, 2013 - April 2, 2026

Available Issues

April 10, 2013 - April 2, 2026

Advancing Public Trust Relationships in Electronic Government: The Singapore E-Filing Journey

Published Online:3 Nov 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0386

References

  • Accenture Leadership in customer service: Delivering on the promise. The Government Executive Series (2007) . Accessed May 16, 2010, http://nstore.accenture.com/acn_com/PDF/2007LCSDelivPromiseFinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Accenture Leadership in customer service: Creating shared responsibility for better outcomes. The Government Executive Series (2009) . Accessed May 16, 2010, http://www.accenture.com/NR/rdonlyres/14E4340B-4D2B-4147-9291-8FA94D8218E7/0/LCS08-Report012109.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Azad B., Faraj S. Making e-government workable: Exploring the evolution of frames. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(1):75–98Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bélanger F., Carter L. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(2):165–176Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bélanger F., Hiller J. A framework for e-government: Privacy implications. Bus. Process Management J. (2006) 12(1):48–60Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):211–242Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Boyatzis R. E.Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Butler J. K. Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of conditions of trust inventory. J. Management (1991) 17(3):643–663Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Carter L., Bélanger F. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inform. Systems J. (2005) 15(1):5–25Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chan C. M. L., Pan S. L. User engagement in e-government systems implementation: A comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(2):124–139Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chen Y. N., Chen H. M., Huang W., Ching R. K. H. E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study. J. Global Inform. Management (2006) 14(1):23–46Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Cordella A. E-government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form. J. Inform. Tech. (2007) 22(3):265–274Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Coursey D., Norris D. F. Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Admin. Rev. (2008) 68(3):523–536Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Dashti A., Benbasat I., Burton-Jones A. Developing trust reciprocity in electronic-government: The role of felt trust. Proc. Eur. Mediterranean Conf. Inform. Systems (2009) Izmir, Turkey:1–13Google Scholar
  • Devadoss P., Pan S. L., Huang J. C. Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: A case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems (2002) 34(3):253–269Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Doney P. M., Cannon J. P., Mullen M. R. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Acad. Management Rev (1998) 23(3):601–620Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Better stories and better constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(3):620–627Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gambetta D.Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (1988) (Basil Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Rose G. M., Warkentin M., Pavlou P. A. Cultural diversity and trust in IT adoption: A comparison of potential e-voters in the USA and South Africa. J. Global Inform. Management (2005) 13(1):54–78Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Warkentin M., Pavlou P. A., Rose G. M., Becker J. D., Willis G. W. K. E-government adoption. Proc. 8th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (AMCIS) (2002) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA) 567–576Google Scholar
  • George C. The internet's political impact and the penetration/participation paradox in Malaysia and Singapore. Media, Culture Soc. (2005) 27(6):903–920Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gil-Garcia J. R., Chengalur-Smith I., Duchessi P. Collaborative e-government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):121–133Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Grant G., Chau D. Developing a generic framework for e-government. J. Global Inform. Management (2005) 13(1):1–30Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gregor S., Jones D. The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 8(5):312–335Google Scholar
  • Grimsley M., Meehan A. E-government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):134–148Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Grimsley M., Meehan A., Green G., Stafford B., Nixon P., Terzis S. Social capital, community trust, and e-government services. Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. Trust Management, Vol. 2692 (2003) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg) 165–178Lecture Notes Comput. Sci.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gupta B., Dasgupta S., Guptac A. Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(2):140–154Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hackney R., Jones S., Losch A. Towards an e-government efficiency agenda: The impact of information and communication behavior on e-reverse auctions in public sector procurement. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):178–191Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hamner M., Al-Qahtani F. Enhancing the case for Electronic Government in developing nations: A people-centric study focused in Saudi Arabia. Government Inform. Quart. (2009) 26(2):137–143Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Heeks R., Stanforth C. Understanding e-government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective. Eur. J. Inform. Systems. (2007) 16(2):165–177Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Henriksen H. Z., Damsgaard J. Dawn of e-government—An institutional analysis of seven initiatives and their impact. J. Inform. Tech. (2007) 22(1):13–23Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Hill R., Beynon-Davies P., Williams M. D. Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Inform. Tech. People (2008) 21(3):244–266Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Horst M., Kuttschreuter M., Gutteling J. M. Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Comput. Human Behav. (2007) 23(4):1838–1852Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Huang C. J. Usability of e-government websites for people with disabilities. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2003) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) Google Scholar
  • Huang Z. A comprehensive analysis of U.S. counties' e-government portals: Development status and functionalities. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Inland Revenue Authority of SingaporeAnnual report 2009/10 (2010) . Accessed March 21, 2011, http://www.iras.gov.sg/irasHome/page03a.aspx?id=10784Google Scholar
  • Irani Z., Love P. E. D., Elliman T., Jones S. Learning lessons from evaluating egovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(2):155–164Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Irani Z., Love P. E. D., Elliman T., Jones S., Themistocleous M. Evaluating e-government: Leaning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Inform. Systems J. (2005) 15(1):61–82Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kahraman C., Demirel N. C., Demirel T. Prioritization of e-government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: The case of Turkey. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):284–298Crossref, Google Scholar
  • King S. Case tools and organizational action. Inform. Systems J. (1996) 6(3):173–194Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Klecun E. Bring lost sheep into the fold: Questioning the discourse of the digital divide. Inform. Techn. People (2008) 21(3):267–282Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Klein H. K., Myers M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(1):67–94Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kraemer K., King J. L. Computing in public organizations. Public Admin. Rev. (1986) 46(6):488–494Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Lee J. K., Kim D. J., Rao H. R., Khazanchi D., Zigurs I. An examination of trust effects and pre-existing relational risks in e-government services. Proc. 11th Amer. Conf. Inform. Systems (2005) Omaha, NE:1991–2002Google Scholar
  • Leininger M. M., Leininger M. M. Ethnography and ethnonursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research Methods in Nursing (1985) (Grune and Stratton, Orlando, FL) 33–72Google Scholar
  • Letch N., Carroll J. Excluded again: Implications of integrated e-government systems for those at the margins. Inform. Tech. People (2008) 21(3):283–299Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Marco M. D., Sorrentino M. Sowing the seeds of IS cultivation in public service organizations. J. Inform. Tech. (2007) 22(2):184–194Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Moon J. M., Norris D. F. Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inform. Systems J. (2005) 15(1):43–60Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Myers M.Qualitative Research in Business and Management (2008) (Sage Publications Ltd., London) Google Scholar
  • Neher C. D. Asian style democracy. Asian Survey (1994) 34(11):949–961Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Olphert W., Damodaran L. Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 8(9):491–507Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):309–340Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Otjacques B., Hitzelberger P., Feltz F. Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(4):29–51Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Pan S. L., Tan C. W., Lim E. Customer relationship management (CRM) in e-government: A relational perspective. Decision Support Systems (2006) 42(1):237–250Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Parent M., Vandebeek C. A., Germino A. C. Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Inform. Quart. (2005) 22(4):720–736Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Periasamy K. P., Sia S.-K. Challenges in delivering cross-agency integrated e-services: The OBLS project. J. Inform. Tech. (2007) 22(4):420–431Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Pew Internet and American Life How Americans get in touch with government. (2004) . Accessed March 21, 2011, http://www.pewinternet.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Phang C. W., Kankanalli A., Ang C. Investigating organizational learning in egovernment projects: A multi-theoretic approach. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2008) 17(2):99–123Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Reddick C. G. Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Inform. Quart. (2005) 22(1):38–57Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Reffat R. Developing a successful e-government. Proc. Sympos. e-Government: Opportunities and Challenge (2003) Muscat Municipality, Oman:IV1–IV13Google Scholar
  • Robbins M. D., Simonsen B., Feldman B. Citizens and resource allocation: Improving decision making with interactive web-based citizen participation. Public Admin. Rev. (2008) 68(3):564–575Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Roy D. Singapore, China and the soft authoritarian challenge. Asian Survey (1994) 34(3):231–242Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Robey D. Reconciling variance and process strategies for studying information system development. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(4):303–327Link, Google Scholar
  • Shapiro D., Sheppard B. H., Cheraskin L. Business on a handshake. Negotiation J. (1992) 8(4):365–377Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Sheppard B. H., Sherman D. M. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):422–437Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Silverman D. Qualitative research: Meanings or practices? Inform. Systems J. (1998) 8(1):3–20Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Skoric M. M., Ying D., Ng Y. Bowling online, not alone: Online social capital and political participation in Singapore. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2009) 14(2):414–433Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Srivastava S. C., Teo T. S. H. Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: Insights from young adults in Singapore. Comm. AIS. (2009) 25(4):359–378Google Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Strub P. J., Priest T. B. Two patterns of establishing trust: The marijuana user. Sociol. Focus (1976) 9(4):399–411Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Tan C. W., Benbasat I., Cenfetelli R., Sprague R. H. Building citizen trust towards e-Government services: Do high quality websites matter? Proc. 41st Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2008) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) . http://www2.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2008.80Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Tan C. W., Benbasat I., Cenfetelli R. IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality. MIS Quart. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S. J., Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. (1984) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Teo T. S. H., Wong P. K. Implementing electronic filing of tax returns: Insights from the Singapore experience. J. Inform. Tech. Case Appl. Res (2005) 7(2):3–18Google Scholar
  • Teo T. S. H., Srivastava S. C., Jiang L. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems (2008) 25(3):99–131Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Torres L., Pina V., Acerete B. E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Inform. Quart. (2005) 22(2):217–238Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Vonk G., Geertman S., Schot P. New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: The diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch public organizations. Public Admin. Rev. (2007) 67(4):745–756Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Warkentin M., Gefen D., Pavlou P. A., Rose M. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets (2002) 12(3):157–162Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Watson R. T., Mundy B. A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(1):27–30Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 61(6):923–929Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Welch E. W., Hinnant C. C., Sprague R. H. Internet use, transparency, and interactivity effects on trust in government. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2003) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) . http://www2.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/abs/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/05/187450144aabs.htmCrossref, Google Scholar
  • Welch E. W., Hinnant C. C., Moon M. J. Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory (2004) 15(3):371–391Crossref, Google Scholar
  • West D. E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Admin. Rev. (2004) 64(1):15–27Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Yao Y., Murphy L. Remote electronic voting systems: An exploration of voters' perceptions and intention to use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(2):106–120Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
  • Zheng Y., Walsham G. Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Inform. Tech. People (2008) 21(3):222–243Crossref, Google Scholar
Previous
Back to Top
Next
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.
Agree