The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis

References

• Adler P., Kwon S. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amoako-Gyampah K., Salam A. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inform. Management (2004) 41(6):731–745Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Slaughter S., Ng K. Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1427–1445Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2000) 82(1):150–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J., Moreland R. Introduction—Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2000) 82(1):1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Au N., Ngai E., Cheng T. Extending the understanding of end-user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):43–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey J., Pearson S. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):530–545Link, Google Scholar
• Barker T., Frolic M. ERP implementation failure—A case study. Inform. Systems Management (2003) 20(4):43–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):61–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(3):351–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A., Premkumar G. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):229–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S., Foster P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(9):991–1013Google Scholar
• Borgatti S., Everett M., Freeman L.Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
• Borgatti S., Mehra A., Brass D. J., Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Sci. (2009) 323(5916):892–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):3–18Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M., Seligman L. Quality of use of a complex technology: A learning-based model. J. Organ. End User Comp. (2005) 17(4):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):518–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D., Ferris G. A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (1995) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 39–79Google Scholar
• Brass D., Kozlowski S. A social network perspective on organizational psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology (2012) (Oxford University Press, UK) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Burkhardt M. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):441–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–819Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–51Link, Google Scholar
• Brown C., Vessey I. Managing the next wave of enterprise systems: Leveraging lessons from ERP. MIS Quart. Executive (2003) 2(1):65–77Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(4):869–898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M., Brass D. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):104–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chau P. Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. J. End User Comp. (2001) 13(1):26–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Compeau D., Higgins C., Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):145–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook S., Brown J. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):381–400Link, Google Scholar
• Cotteleer M., Bendoly E. Order lead-time improvement following enterprise-IT implementation: An empirical study. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):643–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R., Cummings J. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):928–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(3):555–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W., McLean E. Information success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• DeLone W., McLean E. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Doll W., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):171–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A., Bohmer R., Pisano G. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):685–716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. J. AIS (2004) 5(8):314–355Google Scholar
• Fichman R., Kemerer C. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1345–1363Link, Google Scholar
• Fichman R., Kemerer C. The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(3):255–275Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarity. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J. Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(5):921–950Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan M. Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: Development and application of a new framework. DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2001) 32(3):51–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan M., Spitler V., Koufaris M. Does IT training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(1):153–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Walsh J., Huff A. On the distinction between know-how, know-why, and know-what in technological systems. Advances in Strategic Management (1997) (Greenwich, CT)81–101Google Scholar
• Gattiker T., Goodhue D. What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):559–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. Technology features as triggers for sense-making. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 24(3):472–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggerty N., Compeau D. A social cognitive view of technical support and its influence on user learning. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta) Google Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A., Gavin M. B. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management (1998) 24(5):623–641Google Scholar
• Hsieh J., Wang W. Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2007) 16(3):216–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Andrews S. Power, social-influence, and sense making—Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(2):277–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Kilduff M., Tsai W. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):359–371Link, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega (1995) 23(6):587–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs F., Bendoly E. Enterprise resource planning: Developments and directions for operations management research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 146(2):233–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J., Carter P., Zmud R. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang D., Santhanam R. A longitudinal field study of training practices in a collaborative application environment. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(3):257–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K., Dansereau F., Hall R. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(2):195–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M., Brass D., Walsh J., Brief A. Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annuals (2010) 4(Routledge, New York) 317–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Carley K., Prietula M. Graph theoretic dimensions of informal organization. Computational Organizational Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 89–111Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Carley K. A PCANS model of structure in organizations. Proc. 1998 Internat. Sympos. Command and Control Res. Tech. (1998) Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee W., Strong D. Knowing-why about data processes and data quality. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(3):13–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J., Higgins E., Choi H. Development of strategic norms in groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2000) 82(1):88–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy (1988) 17(5):251–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mabert V., Soni A., Venkataramanan M. Enterprise resource planning survey of US manufacturing firms. Production Inventory Management J. (2000) 41(2):52–58Google Scholar
• Markus L., Tanis C., Zmud R. The enterprise experience: From adoption to success. Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past (1999) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):121–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Ramasubbu N., Krishnan M., Fornell C. Designing web sites for customer loyalty across business domains: A multilevel analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(3):97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2000) 82(1):117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nah F., Lau J., Kuang J. Critical factors for succesful implementation of enterprise systems. Bus. Process Management J. (2001) 7(3):285–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Pawlowski S., Robey D. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):645–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S., DeLone W., McLean E. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2008) 17(3):236–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purvis R., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical study. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):117–135Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Lang S., Welker R. Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):50–69Link, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S., Bryk A.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S., Bryk A., Cheong Y., Congdon R., Toit M.HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling (2004) (Scientific Software, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T. Organizational assimilation of complex technologies: An empirical study of component-based software development. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2005) 52(2):249–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E., McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(1):101–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reilly K. AMR research releases enterprise applications market sizing reports. (2007) . Accessed May 2010, http://www.amr-research.com/Content/View.aspx?pmillid=20564Google Scholar
• Robey D., Ross J., Boudreau M. Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):17–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robbins-Gioia (2002) . Accessed May 2010, Press-releases. http://www.robbinsgioia.com/news_events/012802_erp.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Rogers E., Kincaid D.Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research (1981) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ross J., Vitale M. The ERP revolution: Surviving versus thriving. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2000) 2(2):233–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R. Strategic product creation: Managing new interactions of technology, markets, and organizations. Eur. Management J. (1996) 4(2):121–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R., Seligman L., Kang D. Post-Implementation knowledge transfers to users and information technology professionals. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 24(1):174–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedera D., Gable G., Chan T. A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model. Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Information Systems (2004) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta) Google Scholar
• Seibert S., Kraimer M., Liden R. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):219–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma R., Yetton Y. The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):219–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M. E., Berkowitz L. Communication networks. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1964) 1(Academic Press, New York) 111–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somers T., Nelson K. A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle. Inform. Management (2004) 41(3):257–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson E. Information systems innovations among organizations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(9):1069–1092Link, Google Scholar
• Sykes T., Venkatesh V., Gosain S. Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand individual-level system use. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(2):371–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Special Issue):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–400Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G., Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang E., Klein G., Jiang J. ERP Misfit: Country of origin and organizational factors. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):263–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• West B., Welch K., Galecki A.Linear Mixed Models (2007) (Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
• Wynekoop J., Senn J. CASE implementation: The importance of multiple perspectives. Proc. ACM Special Interest Group on Comp. Person. Res. Annual Conf. (1992) New York:63–74Crossref, Google Scholar