The Productivity of Information Technology Investments: New Evidence from IT Labor Data

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0398

References

  • Ackerberg D., Caves K., Frazer G. Structural identification of production functions. (2006) . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  • Applegate L., Cash J., Mills D. Information technology and tomorrow's manager. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) November–December):128–136Google Scholar
  • Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Wu D. Which came first, IT or productivity? Virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. (2006) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(2):277–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atrostic B. K., Gates J., Jarmin R. Measuring the electronic economy: Current status and next steps. (2001) . Working Paper 00–10, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Bartelsman E., Caballero R., Lyons R. Customer- and supplier-driven externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):1075–1084Google Scholar
  • Bloom N., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. American's do I.T. better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R., Bond S. GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Rev. (2000) 19(3):321–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Greenstein S. Technical progress and co-invention in computing and the uses of computers. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1996) 1996:1–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Information technology, workplace organization, and labor demand. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Comm. ACM (1993) 36(12):67–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):23–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2003) 85(4):793–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Saunders A.Wired for Innovation (2010) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Fitoussi D., Hitt L. The information technology iceberg. (2006) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L., Yang S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (2002) 2002(1):137–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng Z., Nault B. R. Industry level supplier-driven it spillovers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1199–1216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chwelos P., Ramirez R., Kraemer K. L., Melville N. P. Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(2):392–408LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Min C. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon R. Does the new economy measure up to great inventions of the past? J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):49–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenan N., Mairesse J. Computers and productivity in france: Some evidence. Econom. Innovation New Technol. (2000) 9(3):275–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (1993) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hall B. The manufacturing sector master file: 1959–1987. (1990) . NBER Working Paper 3366, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R. S., Brynjolfsson E., Kahin B. Measuring the digital economy. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 13–33Google Scholar
  • Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):248–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Wu D., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems. (2002) 19(1):71–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hyatt H., Nguyen S. Computer networks and productivity revisited: Does plant size matter? (2010) . Working paper, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • InformationWeek Multi-year comparisons of informationweek 500 survey data reveal IT trends. (2006) September 12). http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192600107Google Scholar
  • Ito H. The structure of adjustment costs in mainframe computer investment. (1995) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Jorgenson D., Ho M., Stiroh K. A retrospective look at the U.S. productivity growth resurgence. J. Econom. Perspect. (2008) 22(1):3–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee B., Barua A., Whinston A. Discovery and representation of causal relationships in MIS research: A methodological framework. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):109–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinsohn J., Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70(2):317–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenberg F. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Technol (1995) 3(3–4):201–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mata F., Fuerst W., Barney J. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McElheran K. Incumbent response to process innovation: The case(s) of e-business adoption. (2010) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and organizational performance. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mesenbourg T., Atrostic B. K. Measuring the U.S. digital economy: Theory and practice. (2000) . Working paper, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Oliner S., Sichel D. The resurgence of growth in the late 1990's: Is information technology the story? J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):3–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olley S., Pakes A. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica (1996) 64(6):1263–1298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roach S. Services under siege—The restructuring imperative. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1991) September–October):82–92Google Scholar
  • Saunders A. Has information technology leveled the competitive playing field? (2010a) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders A. Valuing IT-related intangible capital. (2010b) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner T. D., Teixeira D. B.Technology in Banking: Creating Value and Destroying Profits (1990) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stiroh K. Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: A meta-analysis and sensitivity tests. Ann. Econom. Statist. (2005) 79/80):529–561Google Scholar
  • Stiroh K. Information technology and productivity: Old answers and new questions. CESifo Econom. Stud. (2008) 54(3):358–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P., Hitt L. M. Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. (2012) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P., Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. (2012) . ForthcomingLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H.Microeconomic Analysis (1992) 3rd ed.(W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge J.Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.