Adoption and Impacts of Interorganizational Business Process Standards: Role of Partnering Synergy

References

• Anderson J. C., Håkansson H., Johanson J. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H., Venkatesh V. Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Inform. Systems Res (2007) 18(3):340–362Link, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barringer B. R., Harrison J. S. Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. J. Management (2000) 26(3):367–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(3):259–275Link, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Anderson E. Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):460–481Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell L., Kashy D. A. Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships (2002) 9(3):327–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell L., Simpson J. A., Boldry J. G., Kashy D. A. Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 88(3):510–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright J., Hahn-Steichen J., He J., Miller T. RosettaNet for Intel's trading entity automation. Intel Techn. J. (2005) 9(3):239–246Google Scholar
• Chang H. M., Shaw J. The business value of process sharing in supply chains: A study of RosettaNet. Internat. J. Electron. Commerce (2009) 14(1):115–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P., Forman C. Can vendors influence switching costs and compatibility in an environment with open standards? MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Cho H., Pucik V. Relationship among innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(6):555–575Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):305–321Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P. A., Greenstein S. The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Econom. Innovations New Techn. (1990) 1(1/2):3–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Depietro R., Wiarda E., Fleischer M., Tornatzky L. G., Mitchell F. The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. The Processes of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 151–175Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farhoomand A. F., Ng P. FedEx Corp. Structural transformation through e-business. (2000) . Harvard Business School, Case HKU098. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Zmud R. W. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing The Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Press, Cincinnati, OH) 105–128Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A., Chehade F. Towards frictionless e-business: The impact of common electronic business interfaces. Comm. ACM. (2003) 46(12):186–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V., Saeed K. The impact of product, market, and relationship characteristics on inter-organizational system integration in manufacturer-supplier dyads. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(4):185–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J. Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):670–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison J. S., Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E., Ireland R. D. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Management (2001) 27(6):679–690Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart P., Saunders C. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):23–42Link, Google Scholar
• Hart P. J., Saunders C. S. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier's perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):87–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hult G. T. M., Ketchen D. J., Slater S. F. Information processing, knowledge development and strategic supply chain performance. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):241–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurley R. F., Hult G. T. M. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Marketing (1998) 62(3):42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacovou C. L., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):465–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D., Anderson E. Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):260–275Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. (1973) 80(4):237–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashy D. A., Kenny D. A., Reis H. T., Judd C. M. The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 451–477Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Cook W.The Analysis of Dyadic Data (2006) (Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kim T., Oh H., Swaminathan A. Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):704–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R., Rai A. Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(4):735–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobelsky K. W., Richardson V. J., Smith R. E., Zmud R. W. Determinants and consequences of firm information technology budgets. Accounting Rev. (2008) 83(4):957–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan R., Martin X., Noorderhaven N. G. When does trust matter to alliance performance? Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):894–917Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Leveraging standard electronic business interfaces to enable adaptive supply chain partnerships. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(3):260–279Link, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Steinfield C. W., Wigand R. T., Minton G. Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 3(3):334–359Link, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nelson M., Shaw M., Qualls W. Interorganizational system standards development in vertical industries. Electronic Markets (2005) 15(4):378–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(9):697–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmatier R. W., Dant R. P., Grewal D. A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance. J. Marketing (2007) 71(4):172–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patnayakuni R., Rai A., Seth N. Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):13–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrone V., Zaheer A., McEvily B. Free to be trusted? Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(4):422–439Link, Google Scholar
• Premkumar G., Ramamurthy K., Sree N. Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 11(2):157–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter P. Deciphering RosettaNet. CIO Insight (2001) July 1Google Scholar
• Rai A., Brown P., Tang X. Organizational assimilation of electronic procurement innovations. J. Management Inform. Systems (2009) 26(1):257–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K., Premkumar G., Crum M. R. Organizational and interorganizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: A causal model. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1999) 9(4):253–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Congdon R.HLM 6 for Windows (2004) (Scientific Software International, Inc., Lincolnwood, IL) . [Computer software]Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(7):483–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Roos G. Time to check out benefits of RosettaNet. EE Times (2001) Sept. 10Google Scholar
• RosettaNet (2007) . Accessed November 30, 2007, http://www.rosettanet.orgGoogle Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23(2):224–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seabright M. A., Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):122–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. B., Barclay D. W. The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. J. Marketing (1997) 61(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D., Rai A., Klein R. Measuring firm performance at the network level: A nomology of the impact of digital supply networks. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):83–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo H. H., Wei K. K., Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):19–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tornatzky L. G., Fleischer M.The Processes of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–399Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wailgum T. Supply chain management: Integration liberation. CIO Magazine (2006) October 15Google Scholar
• Wang L., Zajac E. J. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1291–1317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E., Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 207–256Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):141–159Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao K., Xia M., Shaw M. Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets (2005) 15(4):289–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Xu S. E-business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2003) 12(4):251–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Xu S. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective. Management Sci. (2006a) 52(10):1557–1576Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu S. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006b) 30(Special Issue):515–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Xu S., Dedrick J. Information technology payoff in e-business environments: An international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):17–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713Link, Google Scholar