Research Note—Music Blogging, Online Sampling, and the Long Tail

References

• Anderson C. The long tail. Wired (2004) October):170–177Google Scholar
• Anderson C.The Long Tail (2006) (Hyperion Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Anderson L. R., Holt C. A. Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(5):847–862Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Etzel M. J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(9):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. R., Telang R. The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1359–1374Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12(3):151–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hu Y., Smith M. D. From niches to riches: The anatomy of the long tail. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(4):67–71Google Scholar
• Chellappa R. K., Konsynski B., Sambamurthy V., Shivendu S. An empirical study of the myths and facts of digitization in the music industry. (2007) Presentation 2007 Workshop Information Systems Economics (WISE)MontrealGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y., Wang Q., Xie J. Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. (2010) . Working paper, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
• Dellarocas C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promises and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407–1424Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversation to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739Link, Google Scholar
• Kelman H. C. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. (1961) 25(1):57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• King M. F., Balasubramanian S. K. The effects of expertise, end goal, and product type on adoption of preference formation strategy. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1994) 22(2):146–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price L. L., Feick L. F., Higie R. A. Preference heterogeneity and coorientation as determinants of perceived informational influence. J. Bus. Res. (1989) 19(3):227–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik M. J., Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science (2006) 311(5762):854–856Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanneh K. A draining week in the indie-music spotlight. New York Times (2004) October 18). http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/18/arts/music/18band.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Senecal S., Nantel J. The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. J. Retailing (2004) 80(2):159–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C., Zhang J. Long tail or steep tail: A field investigation into how popularity information affects the distribution of customer choices. (2007) . Working paper, MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4655-07, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Tucker C., Zhang J. How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. (2009) 57(5):828–842Link, Google Scholar
• White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix-estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48(4):817–838Crossref, Google Scholar