Information, Technology, and Information Worker Productivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0408

References

  • Adler P., Mandelbaum A., Nguyen V., Schwerer E. From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):458–484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Sci. (1992) 3(3):321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Appelbaum S. H., Marchionni A., Ferdandez A. The multitasking paradox: Perceptions, problems and strategies. Management Decision (2008) 46(9):1313–1325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apte U. M., Nath H. K., Apte U. M., Karmarkar U. Size, structure and growth of the U.S. information economy. Managing in the Information Economy: Current Research Issues (2007) (Springer, New York) 1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S. Identifying social influence: A comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):217–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Van Alstyne M. The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. (2011) 117(1):90–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1623–1639LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Weill P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Sci. (2007) 18(5):1–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Van Alstyne M. Productivity effects of information diffusion in networks. Proc. 28th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2007) MontréalCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Muchnik L., Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence based contagion from homophily driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2009) 106(51):21544–21549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M., Bover O. Another look at instrumental variables estimation of error-component models. J. Econometrics (1995) 68(1):29–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Badinger H., Muller W., Tondl G. Regional convergence in the European Union, 1985–1999: A spatial dynamic panel analysis. Regional Studies (2004) 38(3):241–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard H. R., Killworth P., Sailor L. Summary of research on informant accuracy in network data and the reverse small world problem. Connections (1981) 4(2):11–25Google Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R., Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models. J. Econometrics (1998) 87(1):115–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Milgrom P., Gibbons R., Roberts J. Complementarities in organizations. Handbook of Organizational Economics (2012) (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  • Bulkley N., Van Alstyne M., Castells M. Why information should influence productivity. A Cross Cultural Perspective (2005) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, United Kingdom) 145–173Google Scholar
  • Burt R. Structural holes. The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110:349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):119–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark H.Using Language (1996) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coviello D., Ichino A., Persico N. Don't spread yourself too thin: The impact of task juggling on workers' speed of job completion. (2010) . NBER Working Paper 16502. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cremer J., Garicano L., Prat A. Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(1):373–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Kurtzberg T. R. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:28–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das A. Knowledge and productivity in technical support work. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):416–431LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dessein W., Santos T. Adaptive organizations. J. Political Econom. (2006) 114(5):956–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster A. D., Rosenzweig M. R. Learning by doing from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. (1995) 103(6):1176–1209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Getis A., Ord J. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Anal. (1992) 24:189–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert S. J., Shallice T. Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology (2002) 44(3):297–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P. J., Kiesler S.Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Iravani S. M. R., Yuen G. Y. Operations systems with discretionary task completion. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):61–77LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krauss S., Fussell S., Galegher J., Kraut R., Egido C. Mutual knowledge and communication effectiveness. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (1990) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 111–145Google Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Eppinger S., Whitney D. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lazear E. Why is there mandatory retirement? J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(6):1261–1264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt S. D. The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. Quart. J. Econom. (1996) 111(2):319–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindbeck A., Snower D. J. Centralized bargaining, multitasking and work incentives. (1996) . Working paper 473, Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  • Lindbeck A., Snower D. J. Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: From Tayloristic to holistic organization. J. Labor Econom. (2000) 18(3):353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little J. A proof of the queueing formula L = λW. Oper. Res. (1961) 9(3):383–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Communications of the ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–178LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monsell S. Task switching trends. Cognitive Sci. (2003) 7(3):134–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan G.Images of Organization (1986) (Sage)Google Scholar
  • Park K. S. Economic growth and multiskilled workers in manufacturing. J. Labor Econom. (1996) 14(2):254–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K., Xin R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Power in Organizations (1981) (Pitman, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Piore M., Sabel C.The Second Industrial Divide. Possibilities for Prosperity (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds M., Van Alstyne M., Aral S. Privacy preservation of measurement functions on hashed text. (2009) 8th Annual Security Conf.April 15–16Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  • Rodan S., Galunic D. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):541–562CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen C. The myth of multitasking. The New Atlantis (2008) 20(Spring):105–110Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein J., Meyer D., Evans E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (2001) 27(4):763–797CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Managment Sci. (2003) 49(4):446–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spink A., Cole C., Waller M. Multitasking behavior. Ann. Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2008) 42(2):93–118Google Scholar
  • Sundararajan A., Provost F., Oestreicher-Singer G., Aral S. Information in digital, economic and social networks. (2011) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Teachman J. D. Analysis of population diversity: Measures of quantitative variation. Sociol. Methods Res. (1980) 8(3):341–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Underwood B. J. Interference and forgetting. Psych. Rev. (1957) 64(1):49–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. The role of relationships in interfirm knowledge transfer and learning: The case of corporate debt markets. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Alstyne M., Zhang J. EmailNet: A system for automatically mining social networks from organizational email communication. (2003) . North American Association for Computational Social and Organization Sciences, June 22–25, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Van Alstyne M., Zhang J. Methods and systems for enabling analysis of communication content while preserving confidentiality. (2009) . U.S. Patent 7,503,070Google Scholar
  • Weber R. A., Camerer C. F. Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):400–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Windmeijer F. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J. Econometrics (2005) 126(1):25–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.