Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A Longitudinal Field Study in a Village in India

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0409

References

  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Animesh A, Prasad K. Social interactions and the “digital divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(2):277–294LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmed A. Open access towards bridging the digital divide—policies and strategies for developing countries. Inform. Tech. Development (2007) 13(4):337–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolffsson E, Van Alstyne MW. Productivity effects of information diffusion in networks, (May 18, 2007). (2007) . Available at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=987499Google Scholar
  • Avgerou C, Walsham G. Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries (2000) (Ashgate, London) Google Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Behrman JR, Wolf BL. The socioeconomic impact of schooling in a developing country. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1984) 66(2):296–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhatnagar S, Schware R. Information and Communication Technology in Rural Development (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bollag B. Developing countries turn to distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2001) June 15). http://chronicle.com/article/developing-countries-turn-to/33378Google Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. (1972) 2(1):113–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P, Lloyd P. Calculating status with negative relationships. Soc. Networks (2004) 26(4):331–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond EU, Walker BA, Hutt MD, Reingen PH. Reputational effectiveness in cross-functional working relationships. J. Product Innovation Management (2004) 21(1):44–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks (2005) 27(1):55–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG. A graph-theoretic framework for classifying centrality measures. Soc. Networks (2006) 28(4):466–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Foster PC. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET 6 for Windows Reference Guide (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
  • Boxman EAW, DeGraaf PM, Flap HD. The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Soc. Networks (1991) 13(1):51–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brislin R, Lonner W, Thorndike R. Cross-Cultural Research Methods (1973) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Brown SA, Venkatesh V. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):399–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, Straub DW. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):228–246LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carrasco JA, Hogan B, Wellman B, Miller EJ. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behaviour: An egocentred approach. Environment and Planning B (2007) 34(6):961–980CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Census of India Census data online. (2001) . Accessed October 1, 2008, http://www.censusindia.netGoogle Scholar
  • Chandar U, Sharma R. Bridges to effective learning through radio. Internat. Rev. Res. Open and Distance Learn. (2003) 4(1):110–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhary SS. Television in distance education: The Indian scene. Indian J. Open Learn. (1992) 1(1):23–31Google Scholar
  • Chinn MD, Fairlie RW. The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers (2006) 59(1):16–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
  • Cooley CH. Human Nature and the Social Order (1964) (Schocken Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Costanza R, Fisher B, Ali S, Beer C, Bond L, Boumans R, Danigelis NL, et al. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Econom. (2007) 61(2–3):267–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crump B, McIlroy A. The digital divide: Why the “don't-want-tos” won't compute: Lessons from a New Zealand ICT project. First Monday (2003) . http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/crump/crumpCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis P. Managing the cooperative difference: A survey of the application of modern management practices in the cooperative context. International Labor Organization (1999) (Geneva, Switzerland) 1–19Google Scholar
  • De Haan J. A multifaced dynamic model of the digital divide. IT Soc. (2004) 1(7):66–88Google Scholar
  • Dekker D, Krackhardt D, Snijders TAB. Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika (2007) 72(4):563–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean mode of information systems success: A ten-year review. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai AR. Rural Sociology in India (1969) (Popular Prakshan, Mumbai, India) Google Scholar
  • Dewan S, Kraemer KL. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S, Riggins FJ. The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2005) 6(12):298–337Google Scholar
  • Dewan S, Ganley D, Kraemer KL. Across the digital divide: A cross-country multi-technology analysis of the determinants of IT penetrations. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2005) 6(12):409–432Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman WR, Robinson JP. Social implication of the Internet. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(1):307–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutta B, Jackson MO. Networks and Groups: Models of Strategic Formation (2003) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst D, Kim L. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1417–1429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedkin NE. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1991) 96(6):1478–1504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gadgil M, Bossert WH. Life historical consequences of natural selection. Amer. Naturalist (1970) 104(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(1):33–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS, Granovetter MS, Swedberg R. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The Sociology of Economic Life (2001) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) 51–74Google Scholar
  • Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods (2005) (University of California, Riverside) . http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/Google Scholar
  • Heeks R. i-Development not e-development: Special issue on ICTs and development. J. Internat. Development (2002) 14(1):1–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heeks R. Worldwide expenditure on ICT4D. (2009) . Accessed July 7, 2009, http://ict4dblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/worldwide-expenditure-on-ict4d/Google Scholar
  • Hoang LA, Castella JC, Novosad P. Social networks and information access: Implications for agricultural extension in a rice farming community in northern Vietnam. Agriculture and Human Values (2006) 23(3):513–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance (2007) 62(1):251–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman DL, Novak TP, Schlosser AE, Compaine BM. The evolution of the digital divide: Examining the relationship of race to Internet access and usage over time. The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hsieh JJP, Rai A, Keil M. Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued behavioral models of the socio economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):97–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbell CH. An input-output approach to clique identification. Sociometry (1965) 28(4):377–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H, Andrews S. Power, social influence and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(2):277–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • India Agro Industry Guide to the Indian agriculture sector. (2007) . Accessed October 1, 2008, http://www.agriculture-industry-india.com/Google Scholar
  • Indian IndustryDirectory of Indian Suppliers (2007) (MyCityPedia Publishers, India) Google Scholar
  • Internet World Stats (2008) . Accessed October 1, 2008, http://www.internetworldstats.com/Google Scholar
  • Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(2):386–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jung JY, Qiu JL, Kim YC. Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “divide”. Comm. Res. (2001) 28(4):507–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kabbar EF, Crump BJ. The factors that influence adoption of ICTs by recent refugee immigrants to New Zealand. Inform. Sci. J. (2006) 9(1):111–121Google Scholar
  • Katz L. A new index derived from sociometric data analysis. Psychometrika (1953) 18(1):39–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz J, Aspden P. Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: Results of a national public opinion survey. Internet Res.: Electronic Networking Appl. Policy (1997) 7(3):170–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman S. Public management needs help! Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):967–969CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keniston K. Grassroots ICT projects in India: Some preliminary hypotheses. ASCI J. Management (2002) 31(1):1–9Google Scholar
  • Keniston K, Kumar D. IT Experience in India: Bridging the Digital Divide (2004) (Sage Publications, Delhi, India) Google Scholar
  • Kilduff M, Krackhardt D. Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(1):87–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M, Tsai W. Social Networks and Organizations (2003) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knack S, Keefer P, Knack S. Does inequality harm growth only in democracies? A replication and extension. Democracy, Governance, and Growth (2003) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) 181–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knoke D, Yang S. Social Network Analysis (2008) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvasny L, Keil M. The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two cities. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) Barcelona, Spain:817–828Google Scholar
  • Lachman R, Nedd A, Hinings B. Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Sci. (1994) 40(1):40–55LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lam JCY, Lee MKO. Digital inclusiveness: Longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 22(4):177–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lenhart A. Barriers to Internet access: From the non-user and new user perspective. Presentation at Assoc. Internet Researchers Conf. 3.0 (2002) Maastricht, Netherlands:1–27Google Scholar
  • Leung K, Bhagat RS, Buchan NR, Erez M, Gibson CB. Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2005) 36(4):357–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 25(1):467–483Google Scholar
  • Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (2001) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A, Dixon A, Brass DJ, Robertson B. The social networks of leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):64–79LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM. Corporate social responsibility: International perspectives. J. Bus. Strategies (2006) 23(1):1–8Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS, Potts BB. Centrality and power revisited: Actor success and group decision making. Soc. Networks (1998) 20(4):353–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • OECD Schooling for tomorrow. Learning to bridge the digital divide. (2000) . Retrieved June 7, 2007, http://www.sourceoecd.orgGoogle Scholar
  • OECD Information and communication technologies and rural development. (2001) . Retrieved June 7, 2007, http://caliban.sourceoecd.org/vl=61553076/cl=13/nw=1/rpsv/~6685/v2001n8/s1/p1lGoogle Scholar
  • Parikh TS, Ghosh K. Understanding and designing for intermediated information tasks in India. IEEE Pervasive Comput. (2006) 5(2):32–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park N, Roman R, Lee S, Chung JE. User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Inform. Management (2009) 29(3):196–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Partridge HL, Andrew G. Redefining the digital divide: Attitudes do matter! Proceedings 70th American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) Annual Meeting, Joining Research and Practice: Social Computing and Information Science (2007) 44(Milwaukee, WI) 1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payton F. Rethinking the digital divide. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(6):89–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland A, Fletcher R, Hasson A. Dak net: Rethinking connectivity in developing nations. Comput. IEEE Comput. Soc. (2004) 37(1):78–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW, Grodal S, Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R. Networks of innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2006) (Oxford University Press, New York) 56–85Google Scholar
  • Puri SK. Integrating scientific with indigenous knowledge: Constructing knowledge alliances for land management in India. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):355–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao BSS. Television for Rural Development (1992) (Concept Publisher, New Delhi, India) Google Scholar
  • Rao J. Celebrations as social investments: Festival expenditures, unit price variation and social status in rural India. J. Development Stud. (2001) 38(1):71–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A. Smart PLS 2.0 (2005) (University of Hamburg, 11 Hamburg, Germany) . http://www.smartpls.deGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rowley TJ. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):887–910CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rozendal R. Cultural and political factors in the design of ICT projects in developing countries research. (2003) . Research report 13. International Institute for Communication and Development, Availabe at http://editor.iicd.org/files/report13.docGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders C. Editor's comments: Information systems in developing countries. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):iii–viCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (2000) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Seddon PB. A re-specification and extension of the Delone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov AV. Network strategies and performance of Canadian banks. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(3):590–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siebert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):219–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silva L, Hirschheim R. Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):327–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson DD. Modeling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction (2001) 96(2):207–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):316–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srite M, Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):679–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Gosain S. Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees' system use. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(2):371–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor M. Influence structures. Sociometry (1969) 32(4):490–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • UN Millennium ProjectInvesting in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals—Overview (2005) (United Nations, New York) . http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/overviewEngLowRes.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • UNESCO Education for all 2000 assessment report, 2001. (2002) . United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), ParisGoogle Scholar
  • United Nations Development Project (UNDP) Monitoring human resources and enlarging people. (2004) . United Nations Development Program, New York, http://www.unmillennium-project.org/documents/overviewEngLowRes.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • van Dijk J. Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics (2006) 34(3–4):221–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dijk J, Hacker K. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inform. Soc. (2003) 19(4):315–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, Bala H. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(3):483–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Bala H, Sykes TA. Impacts of information and communication technology implementations on employees' jobs in service organizations in India: A multi-method longitudinal field study. Prod. Oper. Management (2010) 19(5):591–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsham G, Sahay S. Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects. Inform. Tech. Development (2006) 12(1):7–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B, Collins R. Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory (1983) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 155–200Google Scholar
  • Zagenczyk T, Murrell AJ. It is better to receive than to give: Advice network effects on job and work-unit attachment. J. Bus. Psych. (2009) 24(2):139–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zakaria F. India rising. Newsweek (March 6) (2006) 147(3):32–42Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.