Ushering Buyers into Electronic Channels: An Empirical Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0410

References

  • Abele J. M., Caesar W. K., John R. J. Rechanneling sales. The McKinsey Quart. (2003) 2003(3):2–13Google Scholar
  • Ailawadi K. L., Neslin S. A. The effect of promotion on consumption: Buying more and consuming it faster. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):390–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • AllBusiness.com Online auctions and your business. (2008) . Retrieved January 21, 2009, http://www.allbusiness.com/sales/internet-ebay-selling/1174–1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A., Mela C. F., Neslin S. A. Customer channel migration. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(1):60–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apte U. M., Vepsalainen A. P. J. High tech or high touch? Efficient channel designs for delivering financial services. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (1993) 2(1):39–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hortaçsu A. The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. The RAND J. Econometrics (2003) 34(2):329–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker M. J.Marketing: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (2001) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Insights and analysis of online auctions. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(11):43–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Li C., Rice S. A comparison of multi-unit uniform auctions and simultaneous multi-unit auctions: A theoretical model and laboratory experiment. (2007) . Working paper, University of Connecticut School of Business, Storrs, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Bitner M. J., Faranda W. T., Hubbert A. R., Zeithaml V. A. Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management (1997) 8(3):193–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J. L., Eccles R. G. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociology (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Smith M. D. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):563–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hu Y., Rahman M. S. Battle of the retail channels: How product selection and geography drive cross-channel competition. Management Sci. (2009) 55(11):1755–1765LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hu Y. J., Smith M. D. Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1580–1596LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin C. B., Thomas-Graham P. A., Webster E. A. Channel conflict: When is it dangerous? The McKinsey Quart. (1997) 1997(3):36–43Google Scholar
  • Chase R. B. The customer contact approach to services: Theoretical bases and practical extensions. Oper. Res. (1981) 29(4):698–706LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chellappa R. K., Sin R. G. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer's decision. Inform. Tech. Management (2005) 6(2–3):181–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen P.-Y., Hitt L. M. Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen P.-Y., Hitt L. M., Hendershott T. Information technology and switching costs. Handbooks in Information Systems, Vol. 1, Economics and Information Systems (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 437–470Google Scholar
  • Choudhury V., Hartzel K. S., Konsynski B. R. Uses and consequences of electronic markets: An empirical investigation in the aircraft parts industry. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):471–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Reddi S. P., Row M. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. On optimal reservation price in auctions. Management Sci. (1987) 33(6):763–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Etzion H., Pinker E., Seidmann A. Analyzing the simultaneous use of auctions and posted prices for online selling. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(1):68–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C., Ghose A., Goldfarb A. Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):47–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallien J. Dynamic mechanism design for online commerce. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(2):291–310LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega (2000) 28(5):725–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D. Customer loyalty in e-commerce. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2002) 3(1):27–51Google Scholar
  • Geweke J., Bernardo J., Berger J., Dawid A., Smith F. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) 169–193Google Scholar
  • Gonul F., Srinivasan K. Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit models: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):213–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gonul F., Srinivasan K. Impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):262–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goolsbee A. Competition in the computer industry: Online versus retail. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):487–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2002) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(November):342–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A., Su B.-C., Walter Z. An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: A purchase-decision process perspective. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2004) 8(3):131–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harmon T., Burris P., Van Metre E., Reiss-Davis Z. B2B channel management in a down economy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. (2009) . Forrester Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Harstad R. M. Alternative common-value auction procedures: Revenue comparisons with free entry. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(2):421–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart P., Saunders C. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):23–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J., Manski C. F., McFadden D. Statistical models for discrete panel data. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 179–195Google Scholar
  • Heidelberger P., Welch P. D. Simulation run length in the presence of an initial treatment. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(6):1109–1144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K., Pinkse J., Porter R. H. Empirical implications of equilibrium bidding in first-price, symmetric, common value auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70(1):115–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Frei F. X. Do better customers utilize electronic distribution channels? The case of PC banking. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):732–748LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Xue M., Chen P.-Y. The determinants and outcomes of internet banking adoption. Management Sci. (2007) 57(2):291–307Google Scholar
  • Jain D., Vilcassim N., Chintagunta P. A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1994) 12(3):317–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):146–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Mohr J. J. Leveraging internet technologies in B2B relationships. California Management Rev. (2002) 44(4):24–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N., Vitale M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inform. Tech. Management (2000) 1(12):45–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura W. A., Russell G. J. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(November):379–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kambil A., van Heck E. Reengineering the Dutch flower auctions: A framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman R., Spaulding T., Wood C. Are online auction markets efficient? An empirical study of market liquidity and abnormal returns. Decision Support Systems (2009) 48(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y., Krishnan R., Vogt W. B. On product-level uncertainty and online purchase behavior: An empirical analysis. (2008) . Working paper, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Knox G. A. K. Modelling and managing customers in a multichannel setting. (2006) . Dissertations available from ProQuest. Paper AAI3225484. http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3225484Google Scholar
  • Kopalle P. K., Neslin S. A., Sun B., Sun Y., Swaminathan V. A dynamic structural model of the impact of loyalty programs on customer behavior. Management Sci. (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Koppius O., van Heck E. The role of product quality information, market state information and transaction costs in electronic auctions. (2002) . ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2002–73-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Koppius O., van Heck E., Wolters M. The importance of product representation online: Empirical results and implications for electronic markets. Decision Support Systems (2004) 38(2):161–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
  • Kuruzovich J., Viswanathan S., Agarwal R., Gosain S., Weitzman S. Marketspace or marketplace? Online information search and channel outcomes in auto retailing. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(2):182–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(5):1063–1080CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Weber R. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S., Jones J. L. Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in E-auctions for procurement? Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):455–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S., Jones J. L., Mitchell W. Buyer intention to use internet-enabled reverse auctions: The role of asset specificity, product specialization, and non-contractibility. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(4):705–724CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moe W. W., Fader P. S. Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):326–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neslin S. A., Henderson C., Quelch J. Consumer promotions and the acceleration of product purchases. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(Spring):147–165LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A., Reiley D., Sadrieh A., Hendershott T. Online auctions. Handbooks in Information Systems, Volume 1: Economics and Information Systems (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 571–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Overby E. M., Jap S. D. Electronic and physical market channels: A multiyear investigation in a market for products of uncertain quality. Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):940–957LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing (1985) 40(Fall):41–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter R. H. The role of information in U.S. offshore oil and gas lease auctions. Econometrica (1995) 63(1):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statististics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., McCulloch R., Allenby G. M. The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):321–340LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P. B. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):263–271LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. D., Brynjolfsson E. Consumer decision-making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):541–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun B. Promotion effects on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):430–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Anomalies: The winner's curse. J. Econom. Perspectives (1988) 2(1):191–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • U.S. Census Bureau E-Stats Report 2008. (2010) . Retrieved September 30, 2010, http://www.census.gov/econ/estats/2008/2008report-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Verhoef P. C., Neslin S. A., Vroomen B. Multi-channel customer management: Understanding the research-shopper phenomenon. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(2):129–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswanathan S. Competing across technology-differentiated channels: The impact of network externalities and switching costs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):483–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xue L., Ray G., Whinston A. B. Strategic investment in switching cost: An integrated customer acquisition and retention perspective. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2006) 11(1):7–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xue M., Hitt L. M., Harker P. T. Customer efficiency, channel usage, and firm performance in retail banking. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(4):535–558LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.