Corporate IT Standardization: Product Compatibility, Exclusive Purchase Commitment, and Competition Effects

References

• Anand K., Aron R. Group buying on the Web: A comparison of price-discovery mechanisms. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1546–1562Link, Google Scholar
• Baake P., Boom A. Vertical product differentiation, network externalities and compatibility decisions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2001) 19(1-2):267–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels A., Mines C., Musto S. 2010 to 2012 Glotal tech industry outlook. Forrester Res. (2011) January 31Google Scholar
• Bennington A. Blackberry game changer: BBM coming to iPhone and Android? (2011) . CNBC.com. Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.cnbc.com/id/41890557/Blackberry_Game_Changer_BBM_Coming_to_iPhone_AndroidGoogle Scholar
• Besen S., Farrell J. Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(2):117–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brekke K. R., Nuscheler R., Straume O. R. Quality and location choices under price regulation. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) 5(1):207–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1627–2647Link, Google Scholar
• Chae S., Heidhues P. Buyers' alliances for bargaining power. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 13(4):731–754Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarty S., Dogan K., Tomlinson N. A hedonic study of network effects in the market for word processing software. Decision Support Systems (2006) 41(4):747–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y., Gale I. Buyer alliances and managed competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(1):175–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P., Forman C. Can vendors influence switching costs and compatibility in an environment with open standards? MIS Quart. (2006) 30(SI):541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Li X. Group buying commitment and sellers' competitive advantages. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chen Z. Dominant retailers and the countervailing-power hypothesis. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(4):612–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chipty T., Snyder C. M. The role of firm size in bilateral bargaining: A study of the cable television industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1996) 81(2):326–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curran C. Governance, analytics and standards. CIO Dash-board (2010) May 6). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/analytics-governance-standards/Google Scholar
• Dana J. Buyer groups as strategic commitments. Games and Economic Behavior (2012) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S. Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):265–283Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson P., Waterson M. Countervailing power and consumer prices. Econom. J. (1997) 107(441):418–430Google Scholar
• Ellison S. F., Snyder C. M. Countervailing power in wholesale pharmaceuticals. J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(1):32–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ewerhart C., Fieseler K. Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(3):569–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):9–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y. M. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from Web server pricing. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):303–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N. Competing compatibility standards and network externalities in the PC software market. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1995) 77(4):599–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gile K. Business intelligence driven by compliance, standardization, and performance initiatives. Forrester Res. (2005) April 5Google Scholar
• Hanseth O., Braa K. Hunting for the treasure at the end of the rainbow: Standardizing corporate IT infrastructure. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2001) 10(3-4):261–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D., Moch D. Price indexes for PC database software and the value of code compatibility. Res. Policy (1997) 26(4):509–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horn H., Wolinsky A. Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(3):408–419Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
• Inderst R. Leveraging buyer power. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2007) 25(5):908–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G. Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):338–355Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson A. Apps call, but will your phone answer? msnbc.com. (2010) . Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.msnbc.com/id/34646110/ns/echnology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/apps-call-will-your-phone-answser#.TzPvw_m8Fl4Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., Wang B., Lowry P. B., Cherrington J. O., Watson R. R. Bid together, buy together: On the efficacy of group-buying business models in internet-based selling. The E-Business Handbook (2002) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 99–137Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Wang Y. M. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82Link, Google Scholar
• Lai E. U.S. bank picks IBM's lotus platform over Microsoft's sharepoint. CIO (2009) September 15). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.cio.com/article/502073/U.S._Bank_Picks_IBM_s_Lotus_Platform_Over_Microsoft_s_SharePointGoogle Scholar
• Lee D., Mendelson H. Adoption of information technology under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(4):395–413Link, Google Scholar
• Levinson M. How Dow Chemical keep its IT costs low. CIO (2008) May 22). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.cio.com/article/365613/How_Dow_Chemical_Keeps_Its_IT_Costs_LowGoogle Scholar
• Liang R. PC standards result in better service and more savings. Tech Republic (2003) February 5). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.techrepublic.com/article/pc-standards-result-in-better-service-and-more-savings/5035260Google Scholar
• Liu C. Z., Gal-Or E., Kemerer C. F., Smith M. D. Compatibility and proprietary standards: The impact of conversion technologies in IT-markets with network effects. Inform. Systems Res. (2011) 22(1):188–207Link, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., King J. L. Standard making: A critical research frontier for information systems research. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(SI):405–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma A., Burgess J. Quality competition, welfare, and regulation. J. Econom. (1993) 58(2):153–173Google Scholar
• Markoff J. Windows or Mac? Apple says both. New York Times (2006) April 6). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/technology/06apple.html?_r=1&oref=sloginGoogle Scholar
• Orlov L. M. Why you need more than one software vendor. CIO (2008) January 10). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.cio.com/article/171155/Why_You_Need_More_Than_One_Software_VendorGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg A. Business users want choice for smartphones and mobile UC. Unified comm. Strategies (2010) January 14). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.ucstrategies.com/unified-communications-strategie-views/business-users-want-choice-for-smartphones-and-mobile-uc.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Snyder C. M. Why do larger buyers pay lower prices? Intense supplier competition. Econom. Lett. (1999) 58(2):205–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L. A., Zwiebel J. Organizational design and technology choice Under intrafirm bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(1):195–222Google Scholar
• Swanborg R. Desktop management: How UnitedHealth used standardization to cut costs. CIO (2009) April 28). Accessed July 12, 2011, http://www.cio.com/article/491007/Desktop_Management_UniedHealth_Used_Standardization_to_Cut_CostsGoogle Scholar
• Trotter P. Overcoming CIO challenges in global mobility management. Ovum (2009) JulyGoogle Scholar
• von Ungern-Sternberg T. Countervailing power revisited. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 14(4):507–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzel T., Beimborn D., Konig W. A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(SI):489–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westarp F. V., Buxmann P., Weitzel T., Konig W. The management of software standards in enterprises—Report of an empirical study in Germany and the US. (1999) . Working Paper 1999-10, Institute of Information Systems, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Wolinsky A. Regulation of duopoly: Managed competition vs. regulated monopolies. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(4):821–847Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yano C. A., Gilbert S. M., Chakravarty J., Eliashberg A. K. Coordinated pricing and production/procurement decisions: A review. Managing Business Interfaces: Marketing, Engineering, and Manufacturing Perspectives (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands) 65–103Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu S. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(SI):515–539Crossref, Google Scholar