Research Note—Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services

References

• ABI Location analytics and privacy: The impact of privacy on LBS, location analytics, and advertising. (2011) . Allied Business Intelligence Inc. http://www.abiresearch.com/research/1007751Google Scholar
• Ackerman MS, Mainwaring SD, Garfinkel S, Cranor L. Privacy issues and human-computer interaction. Security and Usability: Designing Secure Systems That People Can Use (2005) (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) 381–400Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J. Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy (2005) 3(1):26–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52(February):27–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman I. Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment Behav. (1976) 8(1):7–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Agarwal R. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(2):339–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awad NF, Krishnan MS. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):13–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal G, Zahedi F, Gefen D. The moderating influence of privacy concern on the efficacy of privacy assurance mechanisms for building trust: A multiple-context investigation. Proc. 29th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2008) (2008) Paris, France(AIS, Atlanta) Google Scholar
• Bansal G, Zahedi FM, Gefen D. The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems (2010) 49(2):138–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkhuus L, Dey A. Location-based services for mobile telephony: A study of user's privacy concerns. Proc. INTERACT, 9th IFIP TC13 Internat. Conf. Human-Comput. Interaction (2003) Zurich, Switzerland(IOS Press, Amsterdam) 709–712Google Scholar
• Barkhuus L, Brown B, Bell M, Sherwood S, Hall M, Chalmers M. From awareness to repartee: Sharing location within social groups. Proc. Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2008) (ACM, Florence, Italy) 497–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman S, Johnson EJ, Kobrin SJ, Lohse GL. International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. Inform. Soc. (2004) 20(5, Nov–Dec):313–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berendt B, Gunther O, Spiekermann S. Privacy in e-commerce: Stated preferences vs. actual behavior. Comm. ACM (2005) 48(4):101–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berghel H. Cyberspace 2000: Dealing with information overload. Comm. ACM (1997) 40(2):19–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G. Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Proc. Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (WEIS) (2010) June 2010Boston http://weis2010.econinfosec.org/papers/session2/weis2010_brandimarte.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Buchanan T, Paine C, Joinson AN, Reips U. Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the internet. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2007) 58(2):157–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkert H, Agre P, Rotenberg M. Privacy-enhancing technologies: Typology, critique, vision. Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape (1997) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 126–143Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bulletin (1959) 56(1):81–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carte AT, Russell JC. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caudill EM, Murphy PE. Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. J. Public Policy and Marketing (2000) 19(1):7–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcoulides GA. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cook M, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Cranor LF. Web Privacy with P3P (2002) (O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• CTIA Best practices and guidelines for location based services. (2008) . The Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA). http://www.ctia.org/content/index.cfm/AID/11300Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ. “How did they get my name”? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):341–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ. Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implication for direct marketing. J. Interactive Marketing (1995) 9(2):10–19Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ. Protecting privacy online: Is self-regulation working? J. Public Policy and Marketing (2000) 19(1):20–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):104–115Link, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Bies JR. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues (2003) 59(2):323–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Williams CC. How ethics can enhance organizational privacy: Lessons from the Choicepoint and TJX data breaches. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(4):673–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCew JW. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology (1997) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhillon GS, Moores T. Internet privacy: Interpreting key issues. Inform. Resources Management J. (2001) 14(4):33–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P. Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents—measurement validity and a regression model. Behav. Inform. Tech. (2004) 23(6):413–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):61–80Link, Google Scholar
• Edelman B. Adverse selection in online “trust” certifications and search results. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2011) 10(1):17–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppler MJ, Mengis J. The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, marketing, accounting, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform. Soc. (2004) 20(5):325–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk RF, Miller NB. A Primer for Soft Modeling (1992) (The University of Akron Press, Akron, OH) Google Scholar
• FTC Privacy online: Fair information practices in the electronic marketplace. (2000) . Federal Trade Commission. http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy2000/privacy2000.pdfGoogle Scholar
• FTC Beyond voice: Mapping the mobile marketplace. (2009) . Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/04/mobilerpt.shtmGoogle Scholar
• FTC A preliminary FTC staff report on protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: A proposed framework for businesses and policymakers. (2010) . Federal Trade Commission. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/12/privacyreport.shtmGoogle Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Freiden JB, Kilsheimer JC. Social values and female fashion leadership: A cross-cultural study. Psych. Marketing (1993) 10(5):399–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. J. Public Policy and Marketing (1991) 10(1):149–166Google Scholar
• Harding A, Nelken D, Feest J. Comparative law and legal transplantation in South East Asia. Adapting Legal Cultures (2001) (Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland, OR) 199–222Google Scholar
• Hoadley MC, Xu H, Lee J, Rosson MB. Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. (2010) 9(1):50–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Novak TP, Peralta MA. Information privacy in the marketspace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the web. Inform. Soc. (1999) 15(2):129–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui KL, Teo HH, Lee SYT. The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):19–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A. Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1281–1296Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Carson DH. Privacy as personal control. Man-Environment Interactions: Evaluations and Applications: Part 2 (1974) (Environmental Design Research Association, Washington, DC) 83–100Google Scholar
• Junglas IA, Watson RT. The U-constructs: Four information drives. Comm. AIS (2006) 17(1):569–592Google Scholar
• Junglas IA, Johnson NA, Spitzmüller C. Personality traits and concern for privacy: An empirical study in the context of location-based services. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2008) 17(4):387–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. The illusion of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32(2):311–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laufer RS, Wolfe M. Privacy as a concept and a social issue—multidimensional developmental theory. J. Soc. Issues (1977) 33(3):22–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H. The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' willingness to disclose personal information. Decision Support Systems (2011) 51(3):434–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra KN, Kim SS, Agarwal J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):336–355Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra KN, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Sci. (2006) 52(12):1865–1883Link, Google Scholar
• Margulis TS. Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. J. Soc. Issues (2003a) 59(2):243–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margulis TS. On the status and contribution of Westin's and Altman's theories of privacy. J. Soc. Issues (2003b) 59(2):411–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):334–359Link, Google Scholar
• Metzger MJ. Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on web site trust and disclosure. Comm. Res. (2006) 33(3):155–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Garder J, Seligman MEP. Why having control reduces stress: If I can stop the roller coaster I don't want to get off. Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications (1980) (Academic Press, New York) 71–95Google Scholar
• Milne GR, Culnan MJ. Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(3):15–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milne GR, Rohm A. Consumer privacy and name removal across direct marketing channels: Exploring opt-in and opt-out alternatives. J. Public Policy and Marketing (2000) 19(2):238–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Sutton RI. Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Rev. Psych. (1993) 44(1):195–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moores T. Do consumers understand the role of privacy seals in e-commerce? Comm. ACM (2005) 48(3):86–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moores T, Dhillon G. Do privacy seals in e-commerce really work? Comm. ACM (2003) 46(12):265–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):332–351Link, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Oded N, Sunil W. Social computing privacy concerns: Antecedents and effects. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI) (2009) (ACM, Boston) 333–336Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–59Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):105–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps J, Nowak G, Ferrell E. Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. J. Public Policy and Marketing (2000) 19(1):27–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff MP, MacKenzie BS, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed GM, Taylor SE, Kemeny ME. Perceived control and psychological adjustment in gay men with AIDS. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1993) 23(10):791–824Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoeman FD. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology (1984) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz MP. Privacy and democracy in cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Rev. (1999) 52(6):1610–1701Google Scholar
• Sheehan KB. An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. J. Interactive Marketing (1999) 13(4):24–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheehan KB. Toward a typology of Internet users and online privacy concerns. Inform. Soc. (2002) 18(1):21–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skinner EA. A guide to constructs of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71(3):549–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slyke CV, Shim JT, Johnson R, Jiang JJ. Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2006) 7(6):415–444Google Scholar
• Smith HJ. Information privacy and its management. MIS Quart. Executive (2004) 3(4):201–213Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H. Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quart. (2011) 35(4):989–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg JS, Burke JS. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2, June):167–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel ME, Leinhart S. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 290–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ. Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Rev. (2002) 90(4):1087–1155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ. A taxonomy of privacy. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. (2006) 154(3):477–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ. “I've got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Rev. (2007) 44(4):745–772Google Scholar
• Son JY, Kim SS. Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(3):503–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiekermann S, Cranor LF. Engineering privacy. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2009) 35(1):67–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiro WG, Houghteling LJ. The Dynamics of Law (1981) 2nd ed.(Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
• Squicciarini CA, Xu H, Zhang X. CoPE: Enabling collaborative privacy management in online social networks. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2011) 62(3):521–534Google Scholar
• Stewart KA, Segars AH. An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):36–49Link, Google Scholar
• Sundar SS, Marathe SS. Personalization vs. customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Comm. Res. (2010) 36(3):298–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swire PP, Daley WM, Irving L. Markets, self-regulation, and government enforcement in the protection of personal information. Privacy and Self-Regulation in the Information Age (1997) (Department of Commerce, Washington, DC) 3–19Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Hu YJ, Smith MD. Gaining trust through online privacy protection: Self-regulation, mandatory standards, or caveat emptor. J. Management Inform. Systems (2008) 24(4):153–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• TRUSTe TRUSTe plugs into wireless: TRUSTe's wireless advisory committee announces first wireless privacy standards. (2004) . http://www.truste.org/articles/wireless_guidelines_0304.phpGoogle Scholar
• Tsai YJ, Kelly GP, Cranor FL, Sadeh N. Location-sharing technologies: Privacy risks and controls. I/S: J. Law Policy Inform. Soc. (2010) 6(2):119–151Google Scholar
• Turner EC, Dasgupta S. Privacy on the Web: An examination of users concerns, technology, and implications for business organizations and individuals. Inform. Systems Management (2003) 20(1):8–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldo J, Lin H, Millett LI. Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age (2007) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Wallston AK, Baum A, Revenson TA, Singer JE. Conceptualization and operationalization of perceived control. Handbook of Health Psychology (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 49–58Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I. Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(2):293–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang N, Xu H, Grossklags J. Third-party apps on Facebook: Privacy and the illusion of control. Proc. ACM Sympos. Comput.-Human Interaction for Management Inform. Tech. (CHIMIT) (2011) Boston(ACM, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisz JR, Rothbaum FM, Blackburn TC. Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(9):955–969Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westin AF. Privacy and Freedom (1967) (Atheneum, New York) Google Scholar
• Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schroder G, van Oppen C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(1):177–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Dinev T, Smith HJ, Hart P. Examining the formation of individual's information privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. Proc. 29th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2008) (2008) Paris, France(AIS, Atlanta) Google Scholar
• Xu H, Dinev T, Smith HJ, Hart P. Information privacy concerns: Liking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. J. Assoc. for Inform. Systems (2011) 12(12):798–824Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Agarwal R. The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems (2010) 26(3):135–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi S, Matsumoto D. Culture and control orientations. The Handbook of Culture and Psychology (2001) (Oxford University Press, New York) 223–243Google Scholar
• Zweig D, Webster J. Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(5):605–633Crossref, Google Scholar