Modeling Supply-Side Dynamics of IT Components, Products, and Infrastructure: An Empirical Analysis Using Vector Autoregression

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0418

References

  • Adner R, Levinthal D. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):611–628LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(4):779–809CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexander C. Notes on the Synthesis of Form (1964) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Arthur WB. The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves (2009) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Backus D. The Canadian-U.S. exchange rate: Evidence from a vector autoregression. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1986) 68(4):628–637CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Clark K. Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus BL. Forecasting sales of new contingent products: An application of the compact disc market. J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4(4):243–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Data and Sources of Collinearity (2004) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
  • Booth GG, Chowdhury M, Martikainen T, Tse Y. Intraday volatility in international stock index futures markets: Meteor showers or heat waves? Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1564–1576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown L. Innovation Diffusion (1981) (Methuen, London) Google Scholar
  • Bucklin LP, Sengupta S. The co-diffusion of complementary innovations: Supermarket scanners and UPC symbols. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(2):148–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DT, Greenberg G, Tobach E. Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. Theories of the Evolution of Knowing (1990) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NY) 1–17Google Scholar
  • Campbell JY, Shiller RJ. Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends. J. Fin. (1988) 43(3):661–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Roth EA, Anthony SD. Seeing What's Next: Using Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change (2004) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cooley T, LeRoy S. A theoretical macroeconomics: A critique. J. Monet. Econ. (1985) 16(3):283–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currie WL, Seltsikas P. Exploring the supply-side if IT outsourcing: Evaluating the emerging role of application service providers. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2001) 10(3):123–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai Q, Kauffman RJ. Business models for internet-based B2B electronic markets. Int'l J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(4):41–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David PA. Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Essays on American and British Experience in the Nineteenth Century (1975) (Cambridge University Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy (1982) 11(3):147–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durbin J, Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, I. Biometrika (1950) 37(3/4):409–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enders W. Applied Econometric Time Series (1995) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Enders W, Sandler T. Causality between transnational terrorism and tourism: The case of Spain. Terrorism (1991) 14(1):49–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ. Co-integration and error-correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):251–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman RG, Kemerer CF. The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(3):255–275LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C. The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. (2005) 51(4):641–654LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman JR, Williams JT, Lin T. Vector autoregression and the study of politics. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1989) 33(4):842–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Funk J. Technological change within hierarchies: The case of the music industry. Econom. Innovation and New Tech. (2007) 16(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Technology diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects. J. Marketing (1989) 53(1):35–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert PD. Combining VAR estimation and state space model reduction for simple good predictions. J. Forecasting (1995) 14(3):229–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relationships by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica (1969) 37(3):424–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH. Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Grover V, Fiedler K, Teng J. Empirical evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core model of information systems innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):273–287LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall P. The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion (1992) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R, Clark KB. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of existing firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes TP. Networks of Power (1983) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins M, Floyd S. Trajectories in the evolution of technology: A multi-level study of competition in Formula 1 racing. Organ. Stud. (2001) 22(6):945–969CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2):93–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Langlois RN, Robertson PL. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Res. Policy (1992) 21(4):297–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Litterman RB. Techniques of forecasting using vector autoregression. (1979) . Working Paper 115, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, MN. Accessed February 16, 2002, http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/WP/WP115.pdfCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lütkepohl H. Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis (1993) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lütkepohl H, Kratzig M, Boreiko D. VAR analysis in JMulti. (2006) . Online-help chapters for JMulti. Accessed February 16, 2012, http://www.jmulti.deGoogle Scholar
  • Lyytinen K, Rose GM. The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: The case of Internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(4):557–595CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNees S. Forecasting accuracy of alternative techniques: A comparison of U.S. macroeconomic forecasts. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1986) 4(1):5–15Google Scholar
  • McNees S. The role of judgment in macroeconomic forecasting accuracy. Int'l J. Forecasting (1990) 6(3):287–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murmann JP, Frenken K. Toward a systemic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy (2006) 35(7):925–952CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dube JP. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):23–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econ. Lit. (1995) 33(1):48–90Google Scholar
  • Pagan AR. Three econometric methodologies: A critical appraisal. J. Econom. Surveys (1987) 1(1):3–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pagan AR, Oxley L, et al. Three econometric methodologies: An update. Surveys in Econometrics (1995) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 30–41Google Scholar
  • Rosenberg N. The direction of technological change: Inducement mechanisms and focusing devices. Econom. Development and Cultural Change (1969) 18(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A, Baum J, McKelvey W. On the complexity of technological evolution: Exploring coevolution within and across hierarchical levels in optical disc technology. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of D. T. Campbell (1999) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 169–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Runkle DE. Vector autoregression and reality. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1987) 5(4):437–454Google Scholar
  • Sahal D. Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Res. Policy (1985) 14(2):61–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlegel G. Vector autoregressive forecasts of recession and recovery: Is less more? Econom. Rev. (1985) 26(Q2):1–12Google Scholar
  • Simon HA. The architecture of complexity: Hierarchic systems. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. (1962) 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
  • Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sims CA. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica (1980) 48(1):1–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sims CA. Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. Euro. Econom. Rev. (1992) 36(5):975–1011CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW. Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica (1990) 58(1):113–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sprecher C, DeRouen K. Israeli military actions and internalization-externalization processes. J. Conflict Resolution (2002) 46(2):244–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stremersch S, Tellis GJ, Franses PH, Binken JLG. Indirect network effects in new product growth. J. Marketing (2007) 71(3):52–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Watson M. Vector autoregressions. J. Econom. Perspectives (2001) 15(4):101–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB. Information systems innovation among organizations. Man. Sci. (1994) 40(9):1069–1092LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB, Ramiller NC. The organizing vision of information systems innovation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(5):458–474LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tornatzky L. The Process of Technological Innovation: Reviewing the Literature (1983) (National Science Foundation, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Tornatzky L, Fleischer M. The Process of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Murmann JP. Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:231–266Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L. On the organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:311–347Google Scholar
  • Zmud RW. An examination of “push-pull” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):727–738LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.