Network Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers: Implications for Content Variety, Broadband Investment, and Regulation

References

• Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):668–691Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan T, Göhmann I, Krämer J. Net neutrality and minimum quality standards: Network effects vs. market power justifications. Spiecker gen. Network Meutrality and Open Access (2010) (Nomos Publishing, Baden Baden) 61–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Guo H. The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (2011) 22(1):60–82Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Kim B-C. Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND J. Econom. (2010) 41(3):446–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford GS, Shum M. Monopoly quality degradation and regulation in cable television. J. Law Econom. (2007) 50:181–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowcroft J. Net neutrality: The technical side of the debate—A white paper. Internat. J. Comm. (2007) 1(1):567–579Google Scholar
• Dou W. Will internet users pay for online content? J. Advertising Res. (2004) 44(4):349–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N. The incentive for non-price discrimination by an input monopolist. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1998) 16(3):271–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Hermalin B. The economics of network neutrality. RAND J. of Econom. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Tåg J. Net neutrality on the internet: A two-sided market analysis. Inform. Econom. & Policy (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• European Commission Directive 2009/136/ec of the European parliament and of the council of 25 November 2009. Official J. Eur. Union (2009) L337:11–36 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:337:0011:0036:En:PDFGoogle Scholar
• FCC (2010) . Report and order: In the matter of preserving the open internet broadband industry practices. FCC 10-201, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Fehrenbacher K. Caught on video: Google CEO dishes on Google Wave, Verizon and social strategy. (2010) . Accessed March 29, 2011, http://gigaom.com/mobile/google-ceo-dishes-on-google-wave-verizon-social-strategy/Google Scholar
• Foros Ø, Kind HJ, Sørgard L. Access pricing, quality degradation, and foreclosure in the Internet. J. Regulatory Econom. (2002) 22(1):59–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn R, Wallsten S. The economics of net neutrality. Berkeley Econom. Press—Economists' Voice (2006) 3(6):1–7Google Scholar
• Hahn R, Litan R, Singer H. The economics of wireless net neutrality. J. Competition Law Econom. (2007) 3(3):399–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Katz ML. The economics of product-line restrictions with an application to the network neutrality debate. Inform. Econom. Policy (2007) 19(2):215–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jamison M, Hauge J. Getting what you pay for: Analyzing the net neutrality debate. (2008) . Mimeo, Social Science Research Network. Accessed March 29, 2011, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1081690Google Scholar
• Kleinrock L. Queuing Systems (1976) 1(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Lambert P. Vodafone and Telefonica are overplaying their hand with Google. (2010) . Accessed December 12, 2010, http://www.telecoms.com/18389/vodafone-and-telefonica-are-overplaying-their-hand-with-google/Google Scholar
• Lessig L. The Future of Ideas (2001) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• McDysan D. QoS and Traffic Management in IP and ATM Networks (1999) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• O'Connell P. At SBC, it's all about “scale and scope”. Bus. week (2005) November 7, 2005). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_45/b3958092.htmGoogle Scholar
• Owen B, Rosston G, Lenard T, May R. Local broadband access: Primum non nocere or primum processi? A property rights approach. Net Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services Be Regulated? (2006) (Springer, New York) 163–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J. Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):645–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ronnen U. Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. RAND J. Econom. (1991) 22(4):490–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneibel G, Farivar C. Deutsche telekom moves against Apple, Google and net neutrality. Deutsche Welle. (2010) July 4). Accessed March 29, 2012, http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5439525,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Schuett F. Network neutrality: A survey of the economic literature. Rev. Network Econom. (2010) 9(2):1–13Google Scholar
• Sidak JG. A consumer-welfare approach to network neutrality regulation of the Internet. J. Competition Law Econom. (2006a) 2(3):349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidak JG. Hearing on network neutrality. (2006b) . Testimony before the United States Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Sydell L. Internet debate—Preserving user parity. (2006) . All Things Considered, National Public Radio. (April 25). Accessed March 29, 2012, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5362403Google Scholar
• Sydell L. Firms abandon online subscription plans. (2007) . All Things Considered, National Public Radio. (September 19). Accessed March 29, 2012, http://www.npr.org/template/story/story.php?storyId=14537587Google Scholar
• Van Schewick B. Towards an economic framework for network neutrality regulation. J. Telecomm. High Tech. Law (2006) 5(2):329–391Google Scholar
• Wu T. Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. J. Telecomm. High Tech. Law (2003) 2(1):141–176Google Scholar
• Wu T, Yoo CS. Keeping the Internet neutral?: Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo debate. Federal Comm. Law J. (2007) 59(3):575–592Google Scholar
• Wyatt E. Google and Verizon near deal on web pay tiers. New York Times (2010) August 4). Assessed March 29, 2012, http:// www.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/technology/05secret.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Yoo C. Beyond network neutrality. Harvard J. Law Tech. (2005) 19:1–77Google Scholar