Research Note—An Investigation of the Appropriation of Technology-Mediated Training Methods Incorporating Enactive and Collaborative Learning

References

• Alavi M, Leidner DE. Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(1):1–10Link, Google Scholar
• Alavi M, Wheeler BC, Valancich JS. Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(3):293–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen IE, Seaman J. (2010) . http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/class_differences, The Sloan Consortium, NovemberGoogle Scholar
• Arthur W, Bennett W, Edens PS, Bell ST. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(2):234–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• ASTD (American Society for Training and Development) ASTD state of the industry report. (2011) . ASTD, http://store.astd.org/Default.aspx?tabid=167&ProductId=22697 Last access May 12, 2012Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohlen GA, Ferratt TW. End user training: An experimental comparison of lecture versus computer-based training. J. End User Comput. (1997) 9(3):14–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolt MA, Killough LN, Koh HC. Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostrom R, Gupta S, Thomas D. A meta-theory for understanding systems within socio-technical systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (2009) 26(1):17–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman BJ, Grupe FH, Simkin MG. Teaching end-user applications with computer-based training: Theory and an empirical investigation. J. End User Comput. (1995) 7(2):12–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1973) (Rand McNally, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Gopal A, Salisbury WD. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):342–397Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) (L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Compeau DR, Olfman L, Sein MK. End-user training and learning. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(7):24–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Rand McNally College Pub. Co., Chicago) Google Scholar
• Davis DL, Davis DF. The effect of training techniques and personal characteristics on training end users of information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1990) 7(2):93–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Yi MY. Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(3):509–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai MS. A field experiment: Instructor-based training vs. computer-based training. J. Instructional Psych. (2000) 27(4):239–244Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Desiraju R, Gopinath C. Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case methods. J. Management Ed. (2001) 25(4):394–408Google Scholar
• Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 15(3):7–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franklin JL, Wissler AL, Spencer GJ. Survey-guided development: A manual for concepts training. (1976) . University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Gist ME, Schwoerer C, Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(6):884–891Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Bostrom RP, Chin WW. Applying adaptive structuring theory to investigate the process of group support systems use. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992/1993) 9(3):45–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green SG, Taber TD. The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1980) 25(1):97–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta . New Approaches to End-User Training (2008) (VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K, Saarbrücken, Germany) Google Scholar
• Gupta S. Longitudinal investigation of collaborative e-learning in an end user training context. (2006) . Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, AthensGoogle Scholar
• Gupta S, Bostrom RP. Technology-mediated learning: A comprehensive theoretical model. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2009) 10(9):637–660Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Bostrom RP. End-user training: What we know, what we need to know? Database Adv. Inform. Systems (2010) 41(4):9–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Bostrom RP, Huber M. End-user training methods: What we know, need to know. SIGMIS Database Adv. Inform. Systems (2010) 41(4):9–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF. Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Herrington J, Reeves TC, Oliver R, Juwah C. A model of authentic activites for online learning. Interactions in Online Learning: Implications for Theory and Practice (2006) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
• Hiltz SR, Coppola N, Rotter N, Turoff M. Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks (2000) 4(2):103–125Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Brief AP. The effects of individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1987) 40(3):392–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber V. Effects of task difficulty, goal setting and strategy on perfomance of a heuristic task. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70(3):492–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson FP. Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (2003) (Allyn and Bacon, Boston) Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition, and Individualization (1975) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice (1999) 38(2):67–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Holubec EJ. Advanced Cooperative Learning (1992) (Interactive Book Co., Edina, MN) Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Stanne MB. Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. (2000) . Accessed May 26, 2011, http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Jonassen DH, Reeves TC. Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Eduational Communications and Technology (2001) (L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 693–719Google Scholar
• King A. Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist (1992) 27(1):111–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehtinen E, Hakkarainen K, Lipponen L, Rahikainen M, Muukkonen H. Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. (2003) . http://www.comlab.hut.fi/opetus/205/etatehtava1.pdf, Last access May 26, 2011Google Scholar
• Levine TR, Hullett CR. Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Comm. Res. (2002) 28(4):612–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim K, Ward L, Benbasat I. An empirical study of computer system learning: Comparison of co-discovery and self-discovery methods. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):254–272Link, Google Scholar
• Lim KH, Benbasat I. The influence of multimedia on improving the comprehension of organizational information. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):99–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Abrami PC, d'Apollonia S. Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educational Res. (2001) 71(3):449–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martocchio JJ. Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(6):819–826Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruyama G. Basics of Structural Equation Modeling (1997) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif) Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ahmad R, Ives B. Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness of basic IT skills training. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(4):401–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, DeSanctis G. Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):5–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, DeSanctis G, Whitman ME, Woszczynski AB. Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and Controversies. The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004) (Idea Group Pub., Hershey, PA) 206–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck CA, Ginsburg-Block MD, Fantuzzo JW, Miller TR. Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. J. Educational Psych. (2003) 95(2):240–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Sasidharan S, Webster J. Using self-regulatory learning to enhance e-learning-based information technology training. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(1):26–47Link, Google Scholar
• Sasidharan S, Santhanam R, Galletta D, Zhang P. Technology-based training: Toward a learner centric research agenda. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications (2006) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 247–258Google Scholar
• Schunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (2004) (Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sein MK, Bostrom RP, Olfman L, Bullinger HJ, Shackel B. Conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT '87 (1985) (Elsevier Science and International Federation of Information Processing (IFIP), Stuttgart, West Germany) 861–867Google Scholar
• Sein MK, Santhanam R. Research report. Learning from goal-directed error recovery strategy. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(3):276–285Link, Google Scholar
• Silver MS. Systems That Support Decision Makers: Description and Analysis (1991) (Wiley, Chichester, New York) Google Scholar
• Vygotskiæi LS, Cole M. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Webster J, Hackley P. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(6):1282–1309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD. Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: Behavior modeing and retention enhancement. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(3):521–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):146–170Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Zhao JL, Zhou L, Nunamaker JF. Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Comm. ACM (2004) 47(5):75–79Crossref, Google Scholar