An Empirical Analysis of Technical Efficiency: The Role of IT Intensity and Competition

References

• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Aigner D, Lovell K, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometrics 6(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amess K (2003) The effect of management buyouts on firm-level technical inefficiency: Evidence from a panel of UK machinery and equipment manufacturers. J. Indust. Econom. 51(5):35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R, Chang H, Natarajan R (2005) Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry. Management Sci. 51(2):291–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R, Kauffman R, Morey R (1990) Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: A study of the Positran deployment at Hardee's Inc. J. Management Inform. Systems 7(2):29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Lee B (1997) The information technology productivity paradox revisited: A theoretical and empirical investigation in the manufacturing sector. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems 9(2):145–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barros C (2008) Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants: A case study for Portugal. Energy Econom. 30(1):59–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basker E (2005) Job creation or destruction? Labor market effects of Wal-Mart expansion. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(1):174–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu S, Fernald J, Oulton N, Srinivasan S (2004) The case of the missing productivity growth: Or, does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not the United Kingdom? Gertler M, Rogoff K, eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Battese G, Coelli T (1988) Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. J. Econometrics 38(3):387–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battese G, Coelli T (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Econom. 20(2):325–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum C, Schaffer M, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Working Paper 545, Department of Economics, Boston College, Newton, MA.Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Sambamurthy V, Zmud RW (1999) IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Charlotte, NC, 378–385.Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond S, Elston J, Mairesse J, Mulkay B (2003) Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A comparison using company panel data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(1):153–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. Rand J. Econom. 31(3):549–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borsch-Supan A (1998) Capital's contribution to productivity and the nature of competition. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity, Microeconom. 1998:205–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(4):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Saunders A (2009) Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology is Reshaping the Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casu B, Girardone C (2009) Testing the relationship between competition and efficiency in banking: A panel data analysis. Econom. Lett. 105(1):134–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves R, Barton D (1990) Efficiency in US Manufacturing Industries (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Gurbaxani V (2012) The impacts of IT-related spillovers on long-run productivity: An empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3, Part 2):868–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Computerworld (2010) Forrester downgrades U.S. IT spending forecast. Accessed September 13, 2012. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9191401/Forrester_downgrades_U.S._IT_spending_forecast.Google Scholar
• Cooper B, Watson H, Wixom B, Goodhue D (2000) Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at First American Corporation. MIS Quart. 24(4):547–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornwell C, Schmidt P, Sickles R (1990) Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. J. Econometrics 46(1–2):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daly A, Hitchens D, Wagner K (1985) Productivity, machinery and skills in a sample of British and German manufacturing plant. National Institute Econom. Rev. 3. 111(1):48–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P (1990) The dynamo and computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. AEA Papers Proc. 80(2):355–361.Google Scholar
• Dearden L, Reed H, Van Reenen J (2006) The impact of training on productivity and wages: Evidence from British panel data. Oxford Bulletin Econom. Statist. 68(4):397–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Survey 35(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min C (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(1):66–83.Google Scholar
• Farrell (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Statist. Soc. A 120:253–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folland S, Hofler R (2001) How reliable are hospital efficiency estimates? Exploring the dual to homothetic production. Health Econom. 10(8):683–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaspar J, Massa M (2006) Idiosyncratic volatility and product market competition. J. Bus. 79(6):3125–3152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist S, Gurbaxani V, Town R (2001) Productivity and PC revolution. Working paper, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine. Google Scholar
• Good D, Nadiri I, Roller L, Sickles R (1993) Efficiency and productivity growth comparisons of European and US air carriers: A first look at the data. J. Productivity Anal. 4(1–2):115–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon R (1990) The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Sung N (1999) Competition and productivity growth: The case of the U.S. telephone industry. Econom. Inquiry 37(4):678–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green A, Mayes D (1991) Technical inefficiency in manufacturing industries. Econom. J. 101(406):523–538.Google Scholar
• Hall R (1988) The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. J. Political Econom. 96(5):921–947.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J (1994) Time Series Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O (1983) The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):366–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hay D, Liu G (1997) The efficiency of firms: What difference does competition make? Econom. J. 107(442):597–617.Google Scholar
• Hitt L, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability and consumer surplus: Different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson R (1990) Unobservable effects and business performance. Marketing Sci. 9(1):74–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson D, Stiroh K (2000) Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1:125–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalirajan K, Shand R (1992) Causality between technical and allocative efficiencies: An empirical testing. J. Econom. Stud. 19(2):3–17.Google Scholar
• Kaparakis E, Miller S, Noulas A (1994) Short-run cost inefficiency of commercial banks: A flexible stochastic frontier approach. J. Money, Credit Banking 26(4):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkley J, Squires D, Strand I (1998) Characterizing managerial skill and technical efficiency in a fishery. J. Productivity Anal. 9(2):145–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneller R, Stevens A (2006) Frontier technology and absorptive capacity: Evidence from OECD manufacturing industries. Oxford Bulletin Econom. Statist. 68(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koke J, Renneboog L (2005) Do corporate control and product market competition lead to stronger productivity growth? Evidence from market-oriented and blockholder-based governance regimes. J. Law Econom. 48(2):475–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kompas T, Che T, Grafton R (2004) Technical efficiency effects of input controls: Evidence from Australia's banana prawn fishery. Appl. Econom. 36(15):1631–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman P (1994) The myth of Asia's miracle. Foreign Affairs 73(6):62–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar S (1991) Estimation of technical inefficiency in panel data with firm- and time-specific effects. Econom. Lett. 36(1):43–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar S, Hjalmarsson L (1995) Labour-use efficiency in Swedish social insurance offices. J. Appl. Econometrics 10(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar S, Lovell C (2000) Stochastic Frontier Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar S, Ghosh S, McGuckin J (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in U.S. dairy farms. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 9(1):279–286.Google Scholar
• Lee B, Barua A (1999) An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence. J. Productivity Anal. 12(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee B, Menon N (2000) Information technology value through different normative lenses. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(4):99–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency v.s. X-efficiency. Amer. Econom. Rev. 56(3):392–415.Google Scholar
• Levine R, Loayza N, Beck T (2000) Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. J. Monetary Econom. 46:31–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindenberg E, Ross S (1981) Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. J. Bus. 54(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute (2001) U.S. productivity growth 1995–2000. McKinsey Global Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Melville N, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2007) The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems 43(1):229–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J. Political Econom. 104(4):724–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishimizu M, Page J (1982) Total factor productivity growth, technical progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965–78. Econom. J. 92(368):920–936.Google Scholar
• Oliner S, Sichel D (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oulton N (1998) Competition and the dispersion of labour productivity amongst UK companies. Oxford Econom. Papers 50(1):23–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oum T, Zhang Y (1995) Competition and allocative efficiency: The case of the U.S. telephone industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. 77(1):82–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitt M, Lee L (1981) Measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. J. Development Econom. 9(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Primeaux W (1977) An assessment of X-efficiency gained through competition. Rev. Econom. Statist. 59(1):105–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer F (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Schmidt P, Lovell K (1980) Estimating stochastic production and cost frontiers when technical and allocative inefficiency are correlated. J. Econometrics 13(1):83–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao B, Lin W (2002) Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: A two-stage empirical investigation. Inform. Management 39(5):391–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K (2002) Information technology and U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1559–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wang H (2003) A stochastic frontier analysis of financing constraints on investment: The case of financial liberalization in Taiwan. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 21(3):406–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelock D, Wilson P (2000) Why do banks disappear? The determinants of U.S. bank failures and acquisitions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 82(1):127–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams J (2004) Determining management behavior in European banking. J. Banking and Finance 28(10):2427–2460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willig RD (1987) Corporate governance and product market structure. Razin A, Sadaka E, eds. Economic Policy in Theory and Practice (Macmillan Press, London), 481–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson G, Jadlow J (1982) Competition, profit incentives, and technical efficiency in the provision of nuclear medicine services. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S (1971) Satisficing selection, and innovating remnant. Quart. J. Econom. 85(2):237–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young A (1995) The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. Quart. J. Econom. 110(3):641–680.Crossref, Google Scholar