Research Note—Do Large Firms Become Smaller by Using Information Technology?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0439

References

  • Attewell P, Rule J. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Comm. ACM (1984) 27(12):1184–1192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Greve HR. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan S, Wernerfelt B. Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:347–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldridge JV, Burnham RA. Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational and environmental impacts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20(2):165–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berndt ER, Morrison C. High-tech capital formation and economic performance in U.S. manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. J. Econometrics (1995) 65:9–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berndt ER, Morrison C, Rosenblum L. High-tech capital formation and labor compensation in U.S. manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. (1991) . Working Paper no. 4010 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  • Berndt ER, Bui L, Reiley DR, Urban GL. Information, marketing, and pricing in the U.S. antiulcer drug market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(2):100–105Google Scholar
  • Bharadwaj AS. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanchflower D, Millward N, Oswald A. Unionisation and employment behaviour. Econom. J. (1991) 101(407):815–834Google Scholar
  • Blau PM, Falbe CM, McKinley W, Tracy PK. Technology and organization in manufacturing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21(1):20–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Malone TW, Gurbaxani V, Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1628–1644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carr NG. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) May):41–49Google Scholar
  • Carter NM. Computerization as a predominate technology: Its influence on the structure of newspaper organizations. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(2):247–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice (1984) 2nd ed.(Harper and Row, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K, Malone TW, Lin F. Cognitive science and organizational design: A case study of computer conferencing. Proc. Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (1986) (Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corp., Austin, TX) 43–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, Mowery DC. Technology and Employment: Innovation and Growth in the U.S. Economy (1987) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Daft RL. Organization Theory and Design (1995) 5th ed.(West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN) 160–189Google Scholar
  • Davis JG, Dahr V, King WR, Teng J. The impact of the organization on the computer. Bus. Forum (1984) 9(4):40–44Google Scholar
  • D'Aveni R, Ravenscraft DJ. Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(5):1167–1206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone WH. Firm size and the characteristics of computer use. MIS Quart. (1981) 5(4):65–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G, Poole MS. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S, Min C. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S, Michael SC, Min C. Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):219–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer M, Leeflang P, Verhoef P. Drivers of peak sales for pharmaceutical brands. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2010) 8(4):429–460CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C. The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. (2005) 51(4):641–654LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Francalanci C, Maggiolini P. Measuring the financial benefits of IT investments on coordination. Inform. Resources Management J. (1999) 12(1):5–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • George JF, King JL. Examining the computing and centralization debate. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(7):63–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon R. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices (1990) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) 250–282Google Scholar
  • Gremillion LL. Organization size and information system use: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems (1984) 1(2):4–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grover V, Fiedler K, Teng J. Empirical evidence on Swanson's tri-core model of information systems innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):273–287LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurbaxani V, Shi E. Computers and coordination in manufacturing. J. Organ. Comput. (1992) 2(1):27–46Google Scholar
  • Gurbaxani V, Whang S. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(1):59–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haeckel SH, Nolan RA. Managing by wire. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(5):122–132Google Scholar
  • Hammer M. The superefficient company. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(5):82–91Google Scholar
  • Hammer M, Stanton S. How process enterprises really work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(6):108–117Google Scholar
  • Hansen DR. Management Accounting (1990) (PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston) Google Scholar
  • Harris SE, Katz JL. Firm size and the information technology investment intensity of life insurers. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):333–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henry D, Cooke S, Buckley P, Dumagan J, Gill G, Pastore D, LaPorte S. The Emerging Digital Economy II (1999) (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Hitt LM. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt LM, Wu DJ, Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoos IR. When the computer takes over the office. Harvard Bus. Rev (1960) 38(4):102–112Google Scholar
  • Hoskinsson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel D. Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:215–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber GP. The nature and design of post-industrial organizations. Management Sci. (1984) 30(8):928–951LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber GP. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):47–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James LR, Brett JM. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(2):307–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrell S. Research and development and firm size in the pharmaceutical industry. Bus. Econom. (1983) 18(4):26–39Google Scholar
  • Jasperson JS, Carte TA, Saunders C, Butler BS, Croes HJP, Zheng W. Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):397–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones MR, Karsten H. Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(1):127–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly JR. Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 571–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly JR, Evanisko MJ. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad. Management J. (1981) 24(4):689–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klatzky SR. Automation, size, and the locus of decision making: The cascade effect. J. Bus. (1970) 43(2):141–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kling R, Kraemer KL, Allen JP, Bakos Y, Gurbaxani V, Elliott M, Olson G, Malone T, Smith J. Transforming coordination: The promise and problems of information technology in coordination. Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 507–534Google Scholar
  • Kling R, Kraemer KL, Allen JP, Bakos Y, Gurbaxani V, King J. Information systems in manufacturing coordination: Economic and social perspectives. Proc. Thirteenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1992) Dallas, TX:31–41Google Scholar
  • Lai VS, Guynes JL. An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: A discriminative approach. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1997) 22(2):146–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawson AM. Benchmark input-output accounts for the U.S. economy, 1992: Make, use, and supplementary tables. Survey of Current Bus. (1997a) 78:36–82Google Scholar
  • Lawson AM. Benchmark input-output accounts for the U.S. economy, 1992: Requirements tables. Survey of Current Bus. (1997b) 78:22–47Google Scholar
  • Leavitt HJ, Whisler TL. Management in the 1980s. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1958) 36(6):41–48Google Scholar
  • Lee G, Xia W. Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis. Inform. Management. (2006) 43(8):975–985CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HC. On information technology and organization structure. Acad. Management J. (1964) 7(3):204–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machin S, Booth A, Shower D. Changes in the relative demand for skills in the UK labour market. Acquiring Skills (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machin S, Wadhwani S. The effects of unions on organizational change and employment: Evidence from WIRS. Economic J. (1991) 101(407):324–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala GS. Introduction to Econometrics (1992) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Maddigan R. The measurement of vertical integration. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1981) 63(3):328–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Sci. (1987) 33(10):1317–1332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. What is coordination technology? Paper presented at the National Science Foundation Coordination Theory Workshop (1988) (MIT, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Malone T, Rockart J. Computers, networks and the corporation. Sci. Amer. (1991) 265(3):128–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T, Smith SA. Modeling the performance of organizational structures. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(3):421–436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T, Yates J, Benjamin RI. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus ML, Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):583–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):291–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitra S, Chaya AK. Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of information technology spending. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 13(2):29–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moch MK, Morse EV. Size, centralization, and organizational adoption of innovations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1977) 42(5):716–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kunter MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models (1990) (Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W, Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(2):143–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osterman P. The impact of computers on the employment of clerks and managers. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1986) 39(2):175–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K. Diversification strategy, profit performance, and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:239–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Leblebici H. Information technology and organizational structure. Pacific Sociol. Rev. (1997) 20:241–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL. Economic Models and Economic Forecasts (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pinsonneault A, Kraemer KL. The impact of information technology on middle managers. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):271–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinsonneault A, Kraemer KL. Middle management downsizing: An empirical investigation of the impact of information technology. Management Sci. (1997) 43(5):659–679LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poston R, Grabski S. Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. Internat. J. Accounting Inform. Systems (2001) 2(2):271–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A, Bajwa DS. An empirical investigation into factors relating to the adoption of executive information systems: An analysis of EIS for collaboration and decision support. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(4):939–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray G, Wu D, Konana P. Competitive environment and the relationship between IT and vertical integration. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(4):585–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D, Boudreau M. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V. Strategic agility through digital options: Reconceptualization the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam R, Hartono E. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):125–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin N. The impact of information technology on coordination costs: Implications for firm productivity. Proc. Eighteenth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1997) Atlanta:133–146Google Scholar
  • Shin N. Does information technology improve coordination? An empirical analysis. Logist. Inform. Management (1999) 12(1–2):138–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin N. The impact of information technology on the financial performance of diversified firms. Decision Support Systems. (2006) 41:698–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel ME, Leinhart S. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociol. Methodology (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 290–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strassmann PA. The Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment of Information Technologies (1997) (The Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT) 59–62Google Scholar
  • Strassmann PA. Information Productivity (1999) (The Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT) 1–36Google Scholar
  • Straub D, Rai A, Klein R. Measuring firm performance at the network level: A nomology of the business impact of digital supply networks. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):83–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB. Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(9):1069–1090LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tapscott D, Ticoll D, Lowy A. Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs (2000) (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA) 169–188Google Scholar
  • Turner JA. Firm size, performance, and computer use. Proc. Third Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1982) Ann Arbor, MI:109–120Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Walker G. The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:598–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):423–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(4):307–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whisler T. The Impact of Computers on Organizations (1970) (Praeger Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Sociol. (1981) 87(3):548–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.