Research Note—Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions

References

• Anderson CL, Agarwal R (2011) The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):469–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Argo JJ, White K, Dahl DW (2006) Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information. J. Consumer Res. 33(1):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay D, Higgins C, Thompson R (1995) The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. 2(2):285–324.Google Scholar
• Beck L, Ajzen I (1991) Predicting dishonest actions: Using the theory of planned behavior. J. Res. Personality 25(3):285–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Ze'ev A (2003) Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Comput. Human Behav. 19(4):451–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Parott R, Le Poire BA, Kelley DL, Walther JB, Perry D (1989) Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 6(2):131–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campell AJ (1997) Relationship marketing in consumer markets: A comparison of managerial and consumer attitudes about information privacy. J. Direct Marketing 11(3):44–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canessa E, Riolo RL (2003) The effect of organizational communication media on organizational culture and performance: An agent-based simulation model. Computational Math. Organ. Theory 9(2):147–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplan SE, Turner JS (2007) Bringing theory to research on computer-mediated comforting communication. Computers in Human Behav. 23(2):985–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson JR, Zmud RW (1999) Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. 42(2):153–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson PJ, Davis GB (1998) An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: From “self” to “other” orientation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22(3):335–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahway, NJ), 295–336.Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psych. Bull. 112(1):155–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):386–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Bies RJ (2003) Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues 59(2):323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. 11(3):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debatin B, Lovejoy JP, Horn A-K, Hughes BN (2009) Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 15(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Kinney ST (1998) Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. 9(3):256–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Kinney ST, Hung Y-TC (1999) Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Res. 30(4):405–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 1(17):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Fasolo PM, Davis-LaMastro V (1990) Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J. Appl. Psych. 75(1):51–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Hancock JT, Toma CL (2011) Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media Soc. 13(6):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finn J (2004) A survey of online harassment of a university campus. J. Interpersonal Violence 19(4):468–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4(7):1–77.Google Scholar
• Gibbs JL, Ellison NB, Heino RD (2006) Self-presentation in online personals. Comm. Res. 33(2):152–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert SJ, Horenstein D (1975) The communication of self-disclosure: Level versus valence. Human Comm. Res. 1(4):316–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock JT, Dunham PJ (2001) Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Comm. Res. 28(3):325–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hann IR, Hui KL, Lee SY, Png PL (2007) Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information-processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):13–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemetsberger A (2002) Fostering cooperation on the Internet: Social exchange processes in innovative virtual consumer communities. Adv. Consumer Res. 29(1):354–356.Google Scholar
• Holden RR (1994) Social desirability. Corsini RJ, ed. Encyclopedia of Psychology (John Wiley, New York) 429–430.Google Scholar
• Hu L-T, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui KL, Teo HH, Lee SYT (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. 31(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IDA (Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore) (2007) Annual survey on infocomm usage in households and by individuals for 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ida.gov.sg/doc/Publications/Publications_Level2/20061205092557/ASInfocommUsageHseholds07.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ji P, Lieber PS (2010) Am I safe? Exploring relationships between primary territories and online privacy. J. Internet Commerce 9(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang LC, Bazarova NN, Hancock JT (2010) The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Comm. Res. 37(1):58–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joinson AN, Woodley A, Reips U-D (2007) Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. Comput. Human Behav. 23(1):275–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joinson NA (2001) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 31(2):177–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K-H, Yun H (2007) Crying for me, crying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13(1):298–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Thye SR (1999) Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:217–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Poire BA, Burgoon JK, Parrott R (1992) Status and privacy restoring communication in the workplace. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 20(4):419–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea M, Spears R, Groot D (2001) Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(5):526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madden M, Smith A (2010) Reputation management and social media. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Reputation_Management_with_topline.pdf.Google Scholar
• Madden M, Fox S, Smith A, Vitak J (2007) Digital footprint: Online identity management and search in the age of transparency. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/pip_digital_footprints.pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. System Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Hollingshead AB (1993) Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. Jessup LM, Valacich JS, eds. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (Macmillan, New York), 78–96.Google Scholar
• Milne GR, Gordon ME (1993) Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy and Marketing 12(2):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moral-Toranzo F, Canto-Ortiz J, Gómez-Jacinto L (2007) Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Comput. Human Behav. 23(3):1660–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nichols DS, Greene RL (1997) Dimensions of deception in personality assessment: The example of MMPI-2. J. Personality Assessment 68(2):251–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofcom (2011) Ofcom technology tracker. Retrieved from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/marketdataresearch/statistics/main_set.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):37–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Peris R, Gimeno MA, Pinazo D, Ortet G, Carrero V, Sanchiz M, Ibanez I (2002) Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology Behav. 5(1):43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perreault S, Bourhi RY (1999) Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(1):92–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petronio S (1991) Boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Comm. Theory 1(4):311–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petronio S (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault A, Heppel N (1997) Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. J. Management Inform. Systems 14(3):89–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R (1998) Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 123(3):238–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratan RA, Chung JE, Shen C, Williams D, Poole MS (2010) Schmoozing and smiting: Trust, social institutions, and communication patterns in an MMOG. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 16(1):93–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riva G, Galimberti C (1998) The psychology of cyberspace: A socio-cognitive framework to computer-mediated communication. New Ideas in Psych. 15(2):141–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schimel J, Arndt J, Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J (2001) Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(1):35–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenbachler DD, Gordon GL (2002) Multi-channel shopping: Understanding what drives channel choice. J. Consumer Marketing 19(1):42–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheer VC (2011) Teenagers' use of MSN features, discussion topics, and online friendship development: The impact of media richness and communication control. Comm. Quart. 59(1):82–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structrual equations models. Leinhart S, ed. Sociological Methodology (Jossey-Bass, San Franciso), 290–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Son J-Y, Kim SS (2008) Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quart. 32(3):503–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KA, Segars AH (2002) An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):36–49.Link, Google Scholar
• Tidwell LC, Walther JB (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Comm. Res. 28(3):317–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toma CL, Hancock JT (2010) Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Comm. Res. 37(3):335–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) Reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K (2009) Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media Soc. 11(8):1349–1371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhoef PC (2003) Understanding the effect of customer relationship management efforts on customer retention and customer share development. J. Marketing 67(4):30–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viégas FB (2005) Bloggers' expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 10(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interprsonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Comm. Res. 23(1):3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther JB (2007) Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Human Behav. 23(5):2538–2557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeless LR, Grotz J (1976) Self-disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: Measurement, validation, and relationships. Human Comm. Res. 3(1):47–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolak JJD, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D (2007) Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. J. Adolescent Health 41(6):51–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woo J (2006) The right not to be identified: Privacy and anonymity in the interactive media environment. New Media Soc. 8(6):949–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Luo X, Carroll JM, Rosson MB (2011) The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems 51(1):42–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC-Y, Agarwal R (2009) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao MZ, Flanagin AJ (2006) A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Comput. Human Behav. 22(3):518–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwick D, Dholakia N (2004) Whose identity is it anyway? Consumer representation in the age of database marketing. J. Macromarketing 24(1):31–43.Crossref, Google Scholar