From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective

References

• Agarwal R (2011) Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):1–4.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Angst CM, DesRoches CM, Fischer MA (2010) Technological viewpoints (frames) about electronic prescribing in physicial practices. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 17(4):425–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahearne M, Jones E, Rapp A, Mathieu J (2008) High touch through high tech: The impact of salesperson technology usage on sales performance via mediating mechanisms. Management Sci. 54(4):671–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Arlow J, Emmerich W, Quinn J (1999) Literate modelling—Capturing business knowledge with the UML, Bézivin J, Muller P-A, eds. The Unified Modeling Language. UML '98: Beyond the Notation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1618 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 189–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JT, Vancouver JB (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psych. Bull. 120(3):338–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azjen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50:179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong J (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Barad K (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: J. Women in Culture Soc. 28(3):801–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C (2007) Information system use-related activity: An expanded conceptualization of information system use. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):173–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Funder DC (2007) Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives Psych. Sci. 2(4):396–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL (2003) Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. 88(6):989–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessiere K, Newhagen JE, Robinson JP, Schneiderman B (2006) A model for computer frustration: The role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood. Comput. Human Behav. 22(6):941–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Tavenner M (2010) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England J. Medicine 363(6):501–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodker S (1998) Understanding representation in design. Human-Comput. Interaction 13(2):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgmann A (1999) Holding on to Reality: The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millenium (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostrom RP, Heinen JS (1977) MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part 1: The causes. MIS Quart. 1(3):17–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Seligman L (2005) Quality of use of a complex technology: A learning-based model. J. Organ. End User Comput. 17(4):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-Month, Anniversary ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Towards a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. 31(4):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Straub D (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):38–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Wand Y, Weber R (2009) Guidelines for empirical evaluations of conceptual modeling grammars. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(6):495–532.Google Scholar
• Butler BS, Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quart. 30(2):211–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JP (1990) Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists' Press, Palo Alto, CA), 687–732.Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (1998) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler D (2002) Semiotics: The Basics (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Gopal A, Salisbury WD (1997) Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. 8(4):342–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covi L, Kling R (1996) Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: Closed rational and open natural system models. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 47(9):672–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K (1997) A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ. Sci. 8(2):157–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davern MJ (1996) When good fit is bad: The dynamics of perceived fit. DeGross JI, Jarvenpaa S, Srinivasan A, eds. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, 112–121.Google Scholar
• Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and end user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):318–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis R, Shrobe H, Szlovits P (1993) What is a knowledge representation? AI Magazine 14(1):17–33.Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):60–95.Link, Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year review. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR (1996) Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quart. 20(4):433–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Desjardins KS, Cook SS, Jenkins M, Bakken S (2005) Effect of an informatics for evidence-based practice curriculum on nursing informatics competencies. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 74(11):1012–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Erez M (1977) Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting–performance relationship. J. Appl. Psych. 62(5):624–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eysenck MW (1982) Attention and Arousal: Cognition and Performance (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Ferguson MF (2007) The goal construct in social psychology. Kruglanski AW, Higgins TE, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford, NY), 490–515.Google Scholar
• Furr RM (2009) Personality psychology as a truly behavioral science. Eur. J. Personality 23(5):369–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasser L (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4(3):205–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. 29(3):559–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. Shaw RE, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 67–82.Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30(3):611–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Hansen MT (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1969) Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. Acta Psychologica 31:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartson HR (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav. Inform. Tech. 23(5):315–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heales J (2002) A model of factors affecting an information system's change in state. J. Software Maintenance 14(6):409–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbert DM, Redmiles DF (2000) Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Comput. Surveys 32(4):384–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain V, Kanungo S (2005) Beyond perceptions and usage: Impact of nature of information systems use on information system–enabled productivity. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 19(1):113–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kent W (2000) Data and Reality (1st Books Library, Fairfield, CA).Google Scholar
• Klein BD, Goodhue DL, Davis GB (1997) Can humans detect errors in data? Impact of base rates, incentives, and goals. MIS Quart. 21(2):169–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein HK, Hirschheim RA (2006) Further reflections on the IS discipline: Climbing the Tower of Babel. King JL, Lyytinen K, eds. Information Systems: The State of the Field (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 307–323.Google Scholar
• Kulik JA, Kulik C-LC (1988) Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Rev. Educational Res. 58(1):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lassila KS, Brancheau JC (1999) Adoption and utilization of commercial software packages: Exploring utilization equilibria, transitions, triggers, and tracks. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(2):63–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law KS, Wong C-S, Mobley WH (1998) Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):741–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.Link, Google Scholar
• LeRouge C, Hevner AR, Collins RW (2007) It's more than just use: An exploration of telemedicine use quality. Decision Support Systems (43):1287–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhorta A, King N, Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcolin BL, Compeau D, Munro MC, Huff SL (2000) Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1):37–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(10/11):609–632.Google Scholar
• Masri K, Gemino A, Parker D (2009) Modular UML for better understanding. Carayannopoulos S, ed. Proc. 37th Annual Conf. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada (ASAC), Niagara Falls, Ontario, 1–19.Google Scholar
• McAfee A (2006) Mastering the three worlds of information technology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(11):141–149.Google Scholar
• Meister DB, Compeau DR (2002) Infusion of innovation adoption: An individual perspective. Sue-Chan C, ed. Proc. 30th Annual Conf. Admin. Sci. Assoc. Canada (ASAC), Winnipeg, Manitoba, 23–33.Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Green L (1995) Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 64(3):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH (2006) Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):332–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Norman DA (1999) Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions 6(3):38–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1991) Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management Inform. Technologies 1(1):9–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A, Markus ML (2009) Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quart. 33(3):433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Overby E (2008) Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organ. Sci. 19(2):277–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Palen L, Salzman M, Youngs E (2000) Going wireless: Behavior and practice of new mobile phone users. Kellog WA, Whittaker S, eds. Proc. 2000 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 201–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons J, Cole L (2005) What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data and Knowledge Engrg. 55(3):327–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons J, Wand Y (2008) A question of class. Nature 455(7216):1040–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P, El-Sawy OO (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P, Dimoka A, Housel TJ (2008) Effective use of collaborative IT tools: Nature, antecedents, and consequences. Proc. of the 41st Hawaii International Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, Hawaii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramiller NC, Pentland BT (2009) Management implications in information systems research: The untold story. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(6):474–494.Google Scholar
• Robey D, Ross JW, Boudreau M-C (2001) Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):17–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D, Schwaig KS, Jin L (2003) Intertwining material and virtual work. Inform. Organ. 13(2):111–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosemann M, Vessey I, Weber R (2004) Alignment in enterprise systems implementations: The role of ontological distance. Agarwal R, Kirsch L, DeGross JI, eds. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Washington, DC, 439–448.Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruhleder K (1994) Rich and lean representations of information for knowledge work: The role of computing packages in the work of classical scholars. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 12(2):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psychologist 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saga VL, Zmud RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Levine L, ed. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 67–86.Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digitial options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):240–253.Link, Google Scholar
• Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Soc. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Soh C (2007) An assessment of package-organisation misalignment: Institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(5):568–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S (2002) Psychological Management of Individual Performance (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub DW, Karahanna E (1998) Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. 9(2):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Strong DM, Volkoff O (2010) Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quart. 34(4):731–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman L (1995) Representations of work (Special Issue). Communications of the ACM 38(9):33–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P (2008) Adaptive system use: An investigation at the system feature level. Boland R, Limayem M, Pentland B, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS), Paris, 1–17.Google Scholar
• Vallacher RR, Wegner DM (1987) What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psych. Rev. 94(1):3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (2005) Knowledge management systems: Representation and communication in context. Systems, Signs, and Actions 1(1):6–18.Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Wang RY (1996) Anchoring data quality in ontological foundations. Comm. ACM 39(11):86–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Weber R (1988) An ontological analysis of some fundamental information systems concepts. DeGross JI, Olson MH, eds. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Minneapolis, 213–225.Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Weber R (1990) An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 16(11):1282–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inform. Systems J. 5(3):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R (1987) Toward a theory of artifacts: A paradigmatic basis for information systems research. Inform. Systems J. 1(2):3–19.Google Scholar
• Weber R (1997) Ontological Foundations of Information Systems (Coopers & Lybrand and Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, Australia).Google Scholar
• Weber R (2003) Editor's comments: Still desperately seeking the IT artifact. MIS Quart. 27(3):iii–xi.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA).Google Scholar
• Weiner N (1948) Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding Computer and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood NJ).Google Scholar
• Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie H, Wolfram D (2002) State digital library usability: Contributing organizational factors. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 53(13):1085–1097.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar