Multicommunicating: Juggling Multiple Conversations in the Workplace

References

• Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Lucas HC. The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):381–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):159–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay D, Higgins C, Thompson R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. (1995) 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C. Information system use-related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(2):173–192Link, Google Scholar
• Baron R, Berkowitz L. Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psych. (1986) (Academic Press, New York) 1–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(6):989–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A. Understanding user responses to IT: A user adaptation coping acts model. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):493–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I, Zmud RW. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC, Kallaith TJ, Strube MJ, Martin GD. Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values. J. Managerial Psych. (1999) 14(3/4):205–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourke PA. Measuring attentional demand in continuous dual-task performance. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. (1997) 50(4):821–840Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodt S, DeSanctis G, Emery J. Looking beyond the messages: The effects of informational and relational complexity on e-communication overload. Acad. Management Annual Meetings (2002) Denver, COGoogle Scholar
• Brown J, McDonald JL, Brown TL, Carr TH. Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Perf. (1988) 14(1):45–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Straub DW. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):228–246Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AF, Webster J. Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Comput. Human Behav. (2005) 21(1):85–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AF, Webster J. Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: Integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(3):754–771Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):40–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ, Gingrich K. The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: A field experiment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1986) 38:162–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JP, Dunnette MD, Hough LM. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1990) 2nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists' Press, Palo Alto, CA) 687–732Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(4):689–707Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):vii–xviCrossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. How to write up and report PLS analyses. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (2010) (Springer, Berlin) 655–690Handbooks of Computational StatisticsCrossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Dibbern J, Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. An introduction to a permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (2010) (Springer, Berlin) 171–193Handbooks of Computational StatisticsCrossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic–mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Brennan SE, Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley SC. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 127–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis (1992) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GB. Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(12):67–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. (2008) 32:575–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Wixom BH, Vandenberg RJ. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25:167–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dollard MF, Winefield HR, Winefield AH, de Jonge J. Psychosocial job strain and productivity in human service workers: A test of the demand-control-support model. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. (2000) 73:501–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher CW, Chengalur-Smith IS, Ballou DP. The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):170–188Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker D. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J, Gould JJ. Features and contexts in technology research: A modest proposal for research and reporting. J. Comp.-Med. Comm. (2009) 14:764–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Comm. AIS (2005) 16:91–109Google Scholar
• Gillie T, Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psych. Res. (1989) 50:243–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR. The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):848–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray PH, Meister DB. Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):821–834Link, Google Scholar
• Grisé M, Gallupe RB. Information overload: Addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 16(3):157–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigney D, Westerman SJ. Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: A critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics (2001) 44(2):132–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigney DE, Taylor RG, Westerman SJ. Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: Task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Res. Part F (2000) 3:113–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock PA, Lesch M, Simmons L. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Anal. Prevention (2003) 35(4):501–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heninger WG, Dennis AR, Hilmer KM. Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):415–424Link, Google Scholar
• Hiltz SR, Turoff M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(7):680–689Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joyce W, Slocum JW, Glinow M. Person-situation interaction: Competing models of fit. J. Occup. Behav. (1982) 3(4):265–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakihara M, Sorensen C. Expanding the “mobility” concept. SIGGROUP Bull. (2001) 22(3):33–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinen K. Reading news from a pocket computer in a distracting environment: Effects of the tempo of background music. Comput. Human Behav. (2002) 18(5):537–551Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(2):285–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kushnir T, Melamed SS. Work-load, perceived control and psychological distress in type A/B industrial workers. J. Organ. Behav. (1991) 12(2):155–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (1984) (Springer Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Levy J, Pashler H. Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Perf. (2001) 27(4):862–869Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohr S. Slow down, brave multitasker, and don't read this in traffic. New York Times (2007) March 25). http://www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
• Macan TH. Time management: Test of a process model. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(3):381–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macan TH, Shahani C, Dipboye RL, Phillips AP. College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. J. Educ. Psych. (1990) 82(4):760–768Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Jarvis CB. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(4):710–730Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods (2002) 7(1):83–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J, Simon H. Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Marcoulides GA, Saunders C. PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):iii–ixCrossref, Google Scholar
• McFarlane DC. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Comput. Interaction (2002) 17(1):63–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Res. (1991) 22(2):147–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:81–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Morello D. The human impact of business IT: How to avoid diminishing returns. (2005) . Gartner Strategic Analysis Report G00125740, Gartner Research, Stanford, CTGoogle Scholar
• Nardi BA, Whittaker S, Hinds P, Kiesler S. The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 83–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navon D, Miller JO. Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1987) 13:438–448Google Scholar
• Nilsson RM, Mayer RE. The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users' navigation strategies and performance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2002) 57(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunes L, Recarte MA. Cognitive demands of hands-free-phone conversation while driving. Transportation Res. Part F: Traffic Psych. Behav. (2002) 5(2):133–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta A. The fragmentation of attention in mobile interaction, and what to do with it. Interactions (2005) 12(6):16–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paas F, Van Merrienboer J. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educ. Psych. Rev. (1994a) 6:351–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paas F, Van Merrienboer J. Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive load approach. J. Educ. Psych. (1994b) 86(1):122–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educ. Psych. (2003) 38(1):1–4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psych. Bull. (1994) 116(2):220–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashler H, Johnston JC, Ruthruff E. Attention and performance. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52:629–651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Persing DL. Managing in polychronic times: Exploring individual creativity and performance in intellectually intensive venues. J. Managerial Psych. (1999) 14(5):358–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):623–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):327–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault A, Barki H, Gallupe RB, Hoppen N. Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):110–133Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Seibold DR, McPhee RD. Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quart. J. Speech (1985) 71(1):74–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qureshi I, Compeau D. Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: a comparison of covariance- and component-based SEM. MIS Quart. (2009) 33(1):197–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinsch NL, Turner JW, Tinsley CH. Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come? Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(2):391–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennecker J, Godwin L. Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Inform. Organ. (2005) 15(3):247–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1995) 124(2):207–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rohrer D, Pashler HE. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (2003) 10(1):96–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruthruff E, Johnston JC, Val Selst M. Why practice reduces dual-task interference. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (2001) 27(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruthruff E, Johnston JC, Van Selst M, Whitsell S, Remington R. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (2003) 29(2):280–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakai K. Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annual Rev. Neuroscience (2008) 31:219–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santosus M. Why more is less: Recent evidence shows that multitasking is an enormous waste of your time and your company's money. CIO (2003) 16(23):102–104Google Scholar
• Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol. Methodology (1982) 13:290–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sohn M, Anderson JR. Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (2001) 130(4):764–778Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE. Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations (1986) 39(11):1005–1016Crossref, Google Scholar
• Speier C, Vessey I, Valacich JS. The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(4):771–797Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steiner ID. Group Process and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Straub D, Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• StudyResponse Project An online social science research resource. (2011) . Accessed September 25, 2012, http://studyresponse.syr.edu/studyresponse/Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Sci. (1988) 12:257–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas FGWC. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psych. Rev. (1998) 10(3):251–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics (2007) 5th ed.(Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston) Google Scholar
• Terborg J, Miller H. Motivation, behavior and performance: A closer examination of goal-setting and monetary incentives. J. Appl. Psych. (1978) 63:29–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176Link, Google Scholar
• Turner JW, Reinsch NL. Except when it's my boss: An exploratory study of intent to communicate polychronically. Acad. Management Annual Meetings (2004) New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
• Turner JW, Reinsch NL. The business communicator as presence allocator. J. Bus. Comm. (2007) 44(1):36–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JW, Tinsley CH. Polychronic communication: Managing multiple conversations at once. Paper presented at Academic Management (2002) Denver, COGoogle Scholar
• Turner JW, Grube J, Tinsley C, Lee C, O'Pell C. Exploring the dominant media: Does media use reflect organizational norms and impact performance? J. Bus. Comm. (2006) 43(3):220–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3(4):4–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Selst M, Ruthruff E, Johnston JC. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1999) 25(5):1268–1283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen P, Steitz DW, Sliwinski MJ, Cerella J. Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psych. Aging (2003) 18(3):443–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall TD, Jackson RR, Mullarkey S, Parker S. The demands-control model of job strain: A more specific test. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. (1996) 69(2):153–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickens CD, Damos DL. Processing resources and attention. Multiple-Task Performance (1991) (Taylor & Francis, London) 3–34Google Scholar
• Williams A. At meetings, it's mind your BlackBerry or mind your manners. New York Times (2009) June 22). http://www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
• Woerner SL, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J. The media toolbox: Combining media in organizational communication. Paper presented at Academic Management (2004) New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
• XLStat Comparing groups with XLSTAT-PLSPM. (2012) . Accessed January 26, http://www.xlstat.com/en/learning-center/tutorials/comparing-groups-with-xlstat-plspm.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Yeung N, Monsell S. The effects of recent practice on task switching. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (2003) 29(5):919–936Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):146–169Link, Google Scholar
• Zigurs I, Buckland BK. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):313–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zweig D, Webster J. Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(5):605–633Crossref, Google Scholar