IT Implementation Contract Design: Analytical and Experimental Investigation of IT Value, Learning, and Contract Structure

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0448

References

  • Anderson EG (2001) Managing the impact of high market growth and learning on knowledge worker productivity and service quality. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 134(3):508–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu DJ (2006) Which came first, IT or productivity? The “virtuous cycle” of investment and use in extended enterprise systems. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milwaukee, WI.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R, Davis G, Slaughter S (1998) Software development practices, software complexity, and software maintenance. Management Sci. 44(4):433–450.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barry E, Mukhopadhyay T, Slaughter S (2002) Software project duration and effort: An empirical study. Inform. Tech. Management 3(1):113–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bouhdary C, Comes S (2008) Accelerate value creation: The virtuous cycle of using technology to maximize business value. SAP Executive Insight (October), 1–8.Google Scholar
  • Brooks FP (1975) The Mythical Man Month (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Fitoussi D, Hitt L (2006) The information technology iceberg. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Chellappa R, Saraf N (2010) Alliances, rivalry and firm performance in enterprise systems software markets: A social network approach. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):849–871.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chiappori PA, Ines M, Patrick R, Salanie B (1994) Repeated moral hazard: The role of memory, commitment, and the access to credit markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. 38(8):1527–1553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chou T (2010) Cloud: Seven Clear Business Models (Active Book Press, Los Altos Hills, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury V, Sabherwal R (2003) Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):291–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E, Hitt L, Snir E (2001) A risk analysis framework for IT outsourcing. Wharton OPIM Working paper, The University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Cohen MC, Agrawal N, Agrawal V (2006) Winning in the aftermarket. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(5):129–138.Google Scholar
  • Davenport TH (2005) The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(6):101–108.Google Scholar
  • DiRomualdo A, Gurbaxani V (1998) Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. 39(4):67–80.Google Scholar
  • Gaimon C (1997) Planning information technology—knowledge worker systems. Management Sci. 43(9):1308–1328.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gaimon C, Ozkan G, Napoleon K (2011) Dynamic resource capabilities: Managing workforce knowledge with a technology upgrade. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1560–1578.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haines M, Goodhue D (2003) Implementation partner involvement and knowledge transfer in the context of ERP implementations. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 16(1):23–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison G, List J (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt LM, Wu DJ, Zhou X (2002) ERP investment: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):71–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. The Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James G (1998) Method of payment. CIO Enterprise (October 15, Section 2):92–95.Google Scholar
  • Kirsch LJ (2000) Software project management: An integrated perspective for an emerging paradigm. Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, (Pinnaflex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati, OH), 285–304. Chap. 15.Google Scholar
  • Lacity M, Hirschheim R (1993) The information systems outsourcing bandwagon: Look before you leap. Sloan Management Rev. 35(1):72–86.Google Scholar
  • Lacity M, Willcocks L (1998) Practices in information technology outsourcing: Lessons from experience. MIS Quart. 22(3):363–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert R (1983) Long-term contracts and moral hazard. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):441–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee TK, Png IPL (1990) The role of installment payments in contracts for services. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):83–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy F (1965) Adaptation in the production process. Management Sci. 11(6):B136–B154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien GL, Kotler P, Moorthy KS (1992) Marketing Models (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Loch CH, Kavadias S (2002) Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns. Management Sci. 48(10):1227–1241.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markus LM, Tanis C, van Fenema PC (2000) Multisite ERP implementations. Comm. ACM 43(4):42–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A (2002) The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation. Production Oper. Management 11(1):33–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A (2003) When too much IT knowledge is a dangerous thing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 44(2):83–89.Google Scholar
  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1986) Bidding for contracts: A principal–agent analysis. RAND J. Econom. 17(3):326–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Competition for agency contracts. RAND J. Econom. 18(2):296–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarlan FW (1981) Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59(5):142–150.Google Scholar
  • Mendelson H (2000) FoxMeyer's Delta project. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Nolan R, McFarlan FW (2005) Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(10):96–106.Google Scholar
  • O'Leary D (2002) Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Systems, Life Cycle, Electronic Commerce, and Risk (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pike G (2006) Supporting business innovation while reducing technology risk. White paper, SAP AG, Walldorf, Germany. Retrieved September 21, 2012, http://www.sap.com/malaysia/solutions/safeguarding/pdf/supportBiz20sep.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Radner R (1981) Monitoring cooperative agreements in a repeated principal–agent relationship. Econometrica 49(5):1127–1148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radner R (1985) Repeated principal–agent games with discounting. Econometrica 53(5):1173–1198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richmond WB, Seidmann A (1993) Software development outsourcing: Contract structure and business value. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(1):57–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richmond WB, Seidmann A, Whinston AB (1992) Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing. Decision Support Systems 8(4):459–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogerson WP (1985) Repeated moral hazard. Econometrica 53(1):69–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SAP annual report (2008) Retrieved December 21, 2010, http://www.sap.com/about/investor/reports/annualreport/2008/pdf/SAP_2008_Annual_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Scott J (1999) The FoxMeyer Drugs' bankruptcy: Was it a failure of ERP? Proc. Fifth Americas Conf. Inform. Systems, Milwaukee, WI, 223–225.Google Scholar
  • Snir E, Hitt L (2004) Vendor screening in information technology contracting with a pilot project. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 14(1):61–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umble EJ, Haft RR, Umble MM (2003) Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146(2):241–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang ETG, Barron T, Seidmann A (1997) Contracting structures for custom software development: The impact of informational rents and uncertainty on internal development and outsourcing. Management Sci. 43(12):1726–1744.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whang S (1992) Contracting for software development. Management Sci. 38(3):307–324.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.