On Risk Management with Information Flows in Business Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0450

References

  • Acerbi C (2002) Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1505–1518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacani C (2011) Olympus scandal: Bye, old guard, hello…old guard? CFO Innovation Asia (October 31).Google Scholar
  • Basu A, Blanning RW (2000) A formal approach to workflow analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1):7–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A, Kumar A (2002) Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):1–14.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J (1980) Statistical Decision Theory: Foundations, Concepts, and Methods (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb CW, Douglas PH (1928) A theory of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 18(1):139–165.Google Scholar
  • Conforti R, Fortino G, La Rosa M, Ter Hofstede AHM (2011) History-aware, real-time risk detection in business processes. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7044 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 100–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett RB (2004) A view of the future of risk management. Risk Management 6(3):51–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Lusignan S (2009) Improving data quality and clinical records: Lessons from the UK National Programme about structure, process and utility. Luzar-Stiler V, Jarec I, Bekic Z, eds. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Inform. Tech. Interfaces (University of Zagreb, Univesity Computing Centre–SRCE, Zagreb, Croatia), 13–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J. Derivatives 4(3):7–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D, Singleton KJ (2003) Credit Risk: Pricing, Measurement, and Management (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • English L (2009) Information quality tipping point: Plain English about information quality. Proc. ITI 2009 31st Int. Conf. Inform. Technology Interfaces, June 22–25, 2009, Cavtat, Croatia, 13–14.Google Scholar
  • Enterprise Risk Management Committee (2003) Overview of enterprise risk management. Casualty Actuarial Society, http://www.casact.org/area/erm/overview.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Forster M, Bailey C, Brinkhof MWG, Graber C, Boulle A, Spohr M, Balestre E, May M, Keiser O, Jahn A (2008) Electronic medical record systems, data quality and loss to follow-up: Survey of antiretroviral therapy programmes in resource-limited settings. Bull. World Health Organ. 86(12):939–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer M, Champy JA (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hee KMv, Reijers HA (2000) Using formal analysis techniques in business process redesign. Business Process Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1806 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 142–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ISACA (2007) Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT). ISACA & IT Governance Institute, Rolling Mendows, IL.Google Scholar
  • J. P. Morgan & Company (1996) RiskMetrics—Technical Document, 4th ed. (Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kiepuszewski B, Ter Hofstede AHM, Bussler C (2000) On structured workflow modelling. Wangler B, Bergman L, eds. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Adv. Inform. Systems Engrg., Stockholm, Sweden, 431–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: Building a safer health system. A report of the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9728.Google Scholar
  • Krishnan R, Peters J, Padman R, Kaplan D (2005) On data reliability assessment in accounting information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):307–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laue R, Mendling J (2010) Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models. Inform. Systems E-Bus. Management 8(3):287–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lea RB, Adams SJ, Boykin RF (1992) Modeling of the audit risk assessment process at the assertion level within an account balance. Auditing: J. Practice Theory 11(Supplement):152–179.Google Scholar
  • Liu D, Wang J, Chan S, Sun J, Zhang L (2002) Modeling workflow processes with colored Petri nets. Comput. Indust. 49(3):267–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu R, Kumar A (2005) An analysis and taxonomy of unstructured workflows. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Bus. Process Management, Nancy, France, 268–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu R, Kumar A, Van der Aalst W (2007) A formal modeling approach for supply chain event management. Decision Support Systems 43(3):761–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marinos G (2004) Data quality: A risk-based approach. Inform. Management (August 1), http://www.information-management.com/issues/20040801/1007208-1.html?zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1.Google Scholar
  • Mausser H, Rosen D (1999) Beyond VaR: Triangular risk decomposition. Algo Res. Quart. 2(1):31–43.Google Scholar
  • Mendling J, Lassen K, Zdun U (2008) On the transformation of control flow between block-oriented and graph-oriented process modelling languages. Internat. J. Bus. Process Integration and Management 3(2):96–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy M (2011) UBS trader Adoboli held over US$2 bn loss. Financial Times (September 15).Google Scholar
  • Olson JE (2003) Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
  • Object Management Group (2011a) UML Specification, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.l/.Google Scholar
  • Object Management Group (2011b) Business Process Model and Notation Specification, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/.Google Scholar
  • Pasley K (2002) Protecting financial information: Sarbanes-Oxley. SOA Compliance Whitepaper, http://www.compliancehome.com/whitepapers/SOX/abstract10846.html.Google Scholar
  • Pflug GCh (2000) Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. Uryasev S, ed. Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reijers H, Jansen-Vullers M, zur Muehlen M, Appl W (2007) Workflow management systems + swarm intelligence = dynamic task assignment for emergency management applications. Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M, eds. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Bus. Process Management (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richter A (2007) The high cost of clean data. http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/9705501/c_2984274/?f=archives.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M (2006a) Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finance and Stochastics 10(1):51–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M (2006b) Optimality conditions in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. Math. Programming 108(2):515–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell N, Ter Hofstede AHM, Van der Aalst W, Mulyar N (2006) Workflow control-flow patterns: A revised view. BPM Center Report BPM-06-22, BPMcenter.org, 06–22.Google Scholar
  • Russell N, Ter Hofstede AHM, Edmond D, Van der Aalst WMP (2004) Workflow data patterns. QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2004-01, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Google Scholar
  • Russell N, Van der Aalst WMP, Ter Hofstede AHM, Edmond D (2005) Workflow resource patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. Pastor O, Falcão e Cunha J, eds. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Adv. Inform. Systems Engrg., Porto, Portugal.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sadiq W, Orlowska ME (2000) Analyzing process models using graph reduction techniques. Info. Systems 25(2):117–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS—Business Process Modeling (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein HD, Nadkarni P, Erdos J, Miller PL (2000) Exploring the degree of concordance of coded and textual data in answering clinical queries from a clinical data repository. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 7(1):42–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strong DM, Lee YW, Wang RY (1997) 10 Potholes in the road to information quality. IEEE Comput. 30(8):38–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun SX, Zhao JL, Nunamaker JF, Sheng ORL (2006) Formulating the data flow perspective for business process management. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):374–391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Aalst WMP (1998) The application of Petri nets to workflow management. J. Circuits, Systems Comput. 8(1):21–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Aalst WMP (2000) Workflow verification: Finding control-flow errors using Petri-net-based techniques. Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1806 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 161–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Aalst WMP, Ter Hofstede AHM (2005) A YAWL: Yet another workflow language. Inform. Systems 30(4):245–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Aalst WMP, Ter Hofstede AHM, Kiepuszewski B, Barros AP (2003) Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3):5–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dongen B, Jansen-Vullers M, Verbeek H, Van der Aalst WMP (2007) Verification of the SAP reference models using EPC reduction, state-space analysis, and invariants. Comput. Indust. 58(6):578–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1992) Microeconomic Analysis (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wand Y, Weber R (1989) A model of control and audit procedure change in evolving data processing systems. The Accounting Rev. 64(1):87–107.Google Scholar
  • Wang J, Chaudhury A, Rao HR (2008) A value-at-risk approach to information security investment. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):106–120.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao JL, Brown GW, Carey MJ, Kumar A, Spohrer JC, Tanniru M (2005) Services science: Services innovation research and education. Chang CK, Zhang LJ, eds. Proc. 2005 IEEE Internat. Conf. Services Comput. (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • zur Muehlen M, Ho D (2005) Risk management in the BPM lifecycle. Bussler CJ, Haller A, eds. Proc. Workshop Bus. Process Design (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 454–466.Google Scholar
  • zur Muehlen M, Rosemann M (2005) Integrating risks in business process models. Campbell B, Underwood J, Bunker D, eds. Proc. Australasian Conf. Inform. Systems (Assoc. Inform. Systems, Atlanta), 1–10.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.