Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context

References

• Agarwal R (2000) Individual acceptance of information technologies. Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati), 85–104.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 9(2):204–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1999) Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision Sci. 30(2):361–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1985) Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(2):393–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Hennessey BA, Grossman BS (1986) Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for-reward. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(1):14–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand P, Sternthal B (1990) Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K, Murray JY (2007) Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. J. Internat. Marketing 15(2):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1984) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psychologist 37(2):122–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Bass BM (1998) Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsch R (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management J. 28(2):238–256.Google Scholar
• Bentham J (1988) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislations (Prometheus Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and Psychology (Appleton-Centry-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Stine RA (1992) Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2):205–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bommer M, Jalajas DS (1999) The threat of organizational downsizing on the innovative propensity of R&D professionals. R & D Management 29(1):27–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC (2003) Learning to use ERP technology: A causal model. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/03/index.html.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC, Seligman L (2005) Quality of use of a complex technology: A learning-based model. J. Organ. End User Comput. 17(4):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brislin RW, Lonner W, Thorndike RM (1973) Cross-Culture Research Method (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Brophy J (1987) Socializing students' motivation to learn. Maher ML, Kleiber DA, eds. Advances in Motivation and Achievements, Vol. 5. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 181–210.Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. 29(3):399–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 11(4):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W (1998a) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1):vii–xvi.Google Scholar
• Chin W (1998b) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ), 295–336.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London).Google Scholar
• Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Management Sci. 36(2):123–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1978) Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. Lepper MR, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 205–216.Google Scholar
• Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers (Harvard Business School Press, Watertown, MA) Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Harris JG, Morison R (2010) Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results (Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston).Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8):982–1003.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 22(14):1111–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCharms R (1968) Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Deci E, Ryan RM (2002) Handbook of Self-Determination (Research University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):60–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Deng L, Poole MS (2010) Affect in Web interfaces: A study of the impacts of Web page visual complexity and order. MIS Quart. 34(4):711–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukerich J, Golden B, Shortell S (2002) Beauty is in the eye of beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behavior of physicians. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):507–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durcikova A, Fadel KJ, Butler BS, Galletta DF (2011) Knowledge exploration and exploitation: The impact of psychological climate and knowledge management system access. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):855–866.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton J, Penner W (1993) The importance of organizational identity for strategic agenda building. Hendry G, Newton J, eds. Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England), 89–113.Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R (1992) Learned industriousness. Psych. Rev. 99(2):248–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cameron J (1996) Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? Amer. Psychologist 51(11):1153–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans GW, Lepore SJ (1997) Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. Moore GT, Marans RW, eds. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, Vol. 4. (Plenum Press, New York), 250–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Chan S, Brzezinski J, Xu S (2006) Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(3):123–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1999) The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. 10(3):255–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan MJ, Spitler VK, Koufaris M (2005) Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(1):153–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2009) Gartner identifies the top 10 strategic technologies for 2010. Report, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1210613.Google Scholar
• Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. 29(3):559–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16:91–109.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated mode. MIS Quart. 27(1):51–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gist ME, Mitchell TR (1992) Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Management Rev. 17(2):183–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(3):213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D, Lewis W, Thompson R (2007) Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: Questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):211–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Greif S, Keller H (1990) Innovation and the design of work and learning environments: The concept of exploration in human-computer interaction. West MA, Farr JL, eds. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 231–249.Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Cote JA, Baumgartner H (2004) Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. 23(4):519–529.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hartwick J, Barki H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. 40(4):440–465.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC (1980) Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong SJ, Thong JYL, Tam KY (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1819–1834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh J, Wang W (2007) Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(3):216–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh J, Zmud RW (2006) Understanding post-adoptive usage behaviors: A two-dimensional view. DIGIT 2006 Proc. Paper 3, http://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2006/3.Google Scholar
• Hsieh J, Rai A, Keil M (2008) Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. 32(1):97–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganiational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Janssen O (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1039–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamis A, Koufaris M, Stern T (2008) Using an attribute-based decision support systems for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. MIS Quart. 32(1):159–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Agarwal R (2011) When the spirit is willing: Symbolic adoption and technology exploration. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution 2(1):51–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim DH (1993) The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Rev. 35(1):37–50.Google Scholar
• Ko DG, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transformer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quart. 29(1):59–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolb DA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kowal J, Fortier MS (2000) Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Res. Quart. Exercise and Sport 71(2):171–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg TR, Amabile TM (2001) From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Res. J. 13(3):285–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon TH, Zmud RW (1987) Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Boland RJ, Hirschheim RA, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 227–251.Google Scholar
• Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen Z (2005) Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inform. Management 42(8):1095–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Management 40(3):191–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Kreitner R (1985) Organizational Behavior Modification and Beyond (Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL).Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Rich GA (2001) Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 29(2):115–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Sci. 5(4):333–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Maslow AH (1970) Motivation and Personality (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• McGraw KO (1978) The detrimental effects of reward on performance: A literature review and a prediction model. Lepper MR, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 255–294.Google Scholar
• McGraw KO, McCullers JC (1979) Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15(3):633–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Peracchio LA (1995) Understanding the effects of color: How the correspondence between available and required resources affect attitudes. J. Consumer Res. 22(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2010) Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quart. 34(1):143–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Agarwal R, Tanniru M (1999) Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23(3):365–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negash S, Gray P (2008) Business intelligence. Frada B, Holsapple CW, eds. Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations (Springer, Berlin), 175–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholls JG (1984) Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psych. Rev. 91(3):328–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC (1994) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) Conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Pelletier LG, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Tuson KM, Briere NM (1995) Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). J. Sport and Exercise Psych. 17(1):35–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA (2006) Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Management J. 49(2):327–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):50–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway NM, Price LL (1994) Exploration in product usage: A model of use innovativeness. Psych. Marketing 11(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) Smart PLS. Accessed November 20, 2010, http://www.smartpls.de. Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Robey D, Ross JW, Boudreau M (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):17–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovation (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci E (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psych. 25(1):54–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Mims V, Koestner R (1983) Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(4):736–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saga VL, Zmud RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Levine L, ed. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 67–86.Google Scholar
• Schaefers KG, Epperson DL, Nauta MM (1997) Women's career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors? J. Counseling Psych. 44(2):173–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz A (2003) Defining information technology acceptance: A human-centered, management-oriented perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
• Scott WE, Podsakoff PM (1982) Leadership, supervision and behavioral control: Perspectives from an experimental analysis. Frederickson L, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 91–121.Google Scholar
• Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):240–253.Link, Google Scholar
• Segars AH (1997) Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega 25(1):107–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Acad. Management J. 46(6):703–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver MS (1991) Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. MIS Quart. 15(1):105–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (1982) Congealing oil: Inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out. J. Management Stud. 19(1):4–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH, Webster J (1991) When is play productive? Accounting, Management, Inform. Tech. 1(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Burgess SM (2002) Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P (2006) The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 64(2):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P (2008) Adaptive system use: An investigation at the system feature level. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Paris, France, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/170.Google Scholar
• Sundaram S, Schwarz A, Jones E, Chin W (2007) Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):101–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. 30(1):57–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, Perrewe PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26(4):381–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):666–681.Google Scholar
• Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM (1994) Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. J. Management Inform. Systems 11(1):167–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Management Inform. Systems 15(4):187–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thong JYL, Hong SJ, Tam KY (2006) The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 64(9):799–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 271–360.Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Briere NM (1990) Validation of the French form of the sports motivation scale. Final report presented to the Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, Research Laboratory on Social Behavior, Université du Québec a Montréal. Montréal.Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Fortier MS (1998) Measures of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and critique. Duda JL, ed. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement (Fitness Information Technology, Inc, Morgantown, WV), 81–101.Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Fortier MS, Guay F (1997) Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(5):1161–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, Briere NM, Pelletier LG (1989) Construction and validation of the academic motivation scale. Canadian J. Behav. Sci. 21(3):323–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF (1992) The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Ed. Psych. Measurement 52(4):1003–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF (1993) On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale. Ed. Psych. Measurement 53(1):159–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. 28(4):695–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Yperen NW, Hagedoorn M (2003) Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Acad. Management J. 46(3):339–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V (1999) Creating favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quart. 23(2):239–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 39(2):273–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Speier C (1999) Computer technology training in the work-place: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 79(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vodanovich S, Sundaram D, Myers M (2010) Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):711–723.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Hsieh J (2006) Beyond routine: Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context. ICIS 2006 Proc. Paper 48, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2006/48.Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J, Martocchio JJ (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quart. 16(2):201–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L (1993) The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comput. Human Behav. 9(4):411–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. A Guide to Managing Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psych. Rev. 66(2):297–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wohlwill J, Heft H (1987) The physical environment and the development of the child. Stokols D, Altman I, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 281–328.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M (1979) Sensation-Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar