Predicting Adoption Probabilities in Social Networks

References

• Altshuler Y, Pan W, Pentland A. Trends prediction using social diffusion models. Internat. Conf. Soc. Comput., Behav.-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (2012) College Park, MD:97–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S. Identifying social influence: A comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):217–223Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1623–1639Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science (2012) 337(6092):337–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence based contagion from homophily driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (2009) 106(51):21544–21549Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. Engineering social contagions: Optimal network seeding and incentive strategies. (2011) . Working paper,Google Scholar
• Atkeson CG, Moore AW, Schaal S. Locally weighted learning. Artificial Intelligence Rev. (1997) 11:11–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006) Philadelphia:44–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ. Everyone's an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. Proc. 4th ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (2011) Hong Kong, China:65–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandari R, Asur S, Huberman B. The pulse of news in social media: Forecasting popularity. (2012) . Working paper, HP LabsGoogle Scholar
• Barnes J, Hut P. A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm. Nature (1986) 324:446–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Bishop CM. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (2006) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Brown JJ, Reingen PH. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(3):350–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruyn AD, Lilien GL. A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2008) 25(3):151–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burges C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery (1998) 2(2):121–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Positions in networks. Soc. Forces (1976) 55(1):93–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr D. How Obama tapped into social networks' power. The New York Times (2008) November 9). http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/business/media/10carr.html?_r=0Google Scholar
• Centola D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science (2011) 334(6060):1269–1272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. (2011) 2(3):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Zeng D. AI for global disease surveillance. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2009) 24(6):66–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wang C, Wang Y. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2010) Washington, D.C.:1029–1038Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2009) Paris:199–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-D, Brown SA, Hu PJ-H, King C-C, Chen H. Managing emerging infectious diseases with information systems: Reconceptualizing outbreak management through the lens of loose coupling. Inform. System Res. (2011) 22(3):447–468Link, Google Scholar
• Crandall D, Cosley D, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Suri S. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2008) Las Vegas:160–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Series B (1977) 39(1):1–38Google Scholar
• Demsar J. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2006) 7:1–30Google Scholar
• Dodds PS, Muhamad R, Watts DJ. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science (2003) 301:827–829Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domingos P, Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learn. (1997) 29:103–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domingos P, Richardson M. Mining the network value of customers. Proc. 7th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2001) San Francisco:57–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye R. The buzz on buzz. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(6):139–146Google Scholar
• Eagle N, Macy M, Claxton R. Network diversity and economic development. Science (2010) 328(5981):1029–1031Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagle N, Pentland A, Lazer D. Inferring social network structure using mobile phone data. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (2009) 106(36):15274–15278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Lett. (2006) 27:861–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. Informal social communication. Psych. Rev. (1950) 57:271–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank E, Hall M, Pfahringer B. Locally weighted Naive Bayes. Proc. Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2003) Acapulco, Mexico:249–256Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE. A Structural Theory of Social Influence (1998) (Cambridge University Press, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. On bias, variance, 0/1—Loss, and the curse-of-dimensionality. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery (1997) 1:55–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goyal A, Bonchi F, Lakshmanan L. Learning influence probability in social networks. Proc. 3rd ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (2010) New York:241–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1978) 83(6):1420–1443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH. Econometric Analysis (2008) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Han J, Kamber M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (2006) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Hand DJ, Mannila H, Smyth P. Principles of Data Mining (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR. Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):585–601Link, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning (2001) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemp P. Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(6):48–57Google Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. (2006) 21(2):256–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu C-W, Chang C-C, Lin C-J. A practical guide to support vector classification. (2003) . Technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan UniversityGoogle Scholar
• Huang J, Ling CX. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2005) 17(3):299–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(3):422–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Andrews SB. Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(2):277–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bult C, Valente TW. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Papadimitriou C, Zhang S. Average distance, diameter, and clustering in social networks with homophily. Internet and Network Economics (2008) 5385(Springer, Berlin) 4–11Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos V. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2003) Washington, D.C.:137–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos V. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social network. Proc. 32nd Internat. Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (2005) Lisboa, PortugalCrossref, Google Scholar
• Kimura M, Saito K. Tractable models for information diffusion in social networks. Proc. 10th Eur. Conf. Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (2006) Berlin:259–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. Cascading behavior in networks: Algorithmic and economic issues. Algorithmic Game Theory (2007) (Cambridge University Press, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. The convergence of social and technological networks. Commun. ACM (2008) 51(11):66–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossinets G, Watts DJ. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science (2006) 3(11):88–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK, Berger M. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, New York) 18–66Google Scholar
• Leenders RTAJ. Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Soc. Networks (2002) 24(1):21–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy DA. The liberating effects of interpersonal influence: An empirical investigation of disinhibitory contagion. J. Soc. Psych. (1992) 132(4):469–473Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy DA, Nail PR. Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Soc. General Psych. Monographs (1993) 119:235–285Google Scholar
• Lorrain F, White HC. Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. (1971) 1:49–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27:415–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TM. Machine Learning (1997) (McGraw Hill, New York) . New chapters accessed at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~tom/NewChapters.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Pan W, Aharony N, Pentland A. Composite social network for predicting mobile apps installation. Proc. Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2011) San Francisco:821–827Google Scholar
• Pentland A. Reality mining. MIT Technology Rev. (2008) 111(2):54–56Google Scholar
• Pickard G, Pan W, Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Crane R, Madan A, Pentland A. Time-critical social mobilization. Science (2011) 334(6055):509–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• PlaySpan (2012) . http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120229006232/en/PlaySpan-Study-Shows-Percentage-Consumers-Buying-Virtual. Accessed July 15, 2012.Google Scholar
• Rice RE, Aydin C. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):219–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice RE, Grand AE, Schmitz J, Torobin J. Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging. Soc. Networks (1990) 12(1):27–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik G, Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 2(3):224–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. (2011) 40(2):211–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Peretti J. Viral marketing for the real world. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) 85(5):22–23Google Scholar
• Wejnert B. Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2002) 28:297–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B, Collins R. Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociology Theory (1983) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 155–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B, Kiesler S. An electronic group is virtually a social network. Culture of the Internet (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 179–205Google Scholar
• Weng J, Lim E, Jiang J, He Q. TwitterRank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Proc. 3rd ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (2010) New York:261–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zukerman I, Albrecht DW. Predictive statistical models for user modeling. User Modeling User-Adapted Interaction (2001) 11(1):5–18Crossref, Google Scholar